You sir are really delusional, the big bang was within time, a big bang can not start from nothing, unless of cause you wish to agree with the bible, which I do not.
Anyone with half a brain knows that you can not have an absolute nothing and make something.
No Sir, it is you that are delusional, driven by your inane maniacal desire to show the world, "You are able to think for yourself"
The problem of course resides in the fact that you know SFA about the science of cosmology, and this inane maniacal thinking for yourself, is just a fairy tale.
It has been explained many times to you that the BB was the evolution of time and space. Before the BB there was no time nor space...there was absolutely nothing.
We are able to speculate though, based on what cosmology does already know.
Let me show you again......
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
https://www.astrosociety.org/publications/a-universe-from-nothing/
A Universe from Nothing
by Alexei V. Filippenko and Jay M. Pasachoff
In the inflationary theory, matter, antimatter, and photons were produced by the energy of the false vacuum, which was released following the phase transition. All of these particles consist of positive energy. This energy, however, is exactly balanced by the negative gravitational energy of everything pulling on everything else. In other words, the total energy of the universe is zero! It is remarkable that the universe consists of essentially nothing, but (fortunately for us) in positive and negative parts. You can easily see that gravity is associated with negative energy: If you drop a ball from rest (defined to be a state of zero energy), it gains energy of motion (kinetic energy) as it falls. But this gain is exactly balanced by a larger negative gravitational energy as it comes closer to Earth’s center, so the sum of the two energies remains zero.
The idea of a zero-energy universe, together with inflation, suggests that all one needs is just a tiny bit of energy to get the whole thing started (that is, a tiny volume of energy in which inflation can begin). The universe then experiences inflationary expansion, but without creating net energy.
What produced the energy before inflation? This is perhaps the ultimate question. As crazy as it might seem, the energy may have come out of nothing! The meaning of “nothing” is somewhat ambiguous here. It might be the vacuum in some pre-existing space and time, or it could be nothing at all – that is, all concepts of space and time were created with the universe itself.
Quantum theory, and specifically Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provide a natural explanation for how that energy may have come out of nothing. Throughout the universe, particles and antiparticles spontaneously form and quickly annihilate each other without violating the law of energy conservation. These spontaneous births and deaths of so-called “virtual particle” pairs are known as “quantum fluctuations.” Indeed, laboratory experiments have proven that quantum fluctuations occur everywhere, all the time. Virtual particle pairs (such as electrons and positrons) directly affect the energy levels of atoms, and the predicted energy levels disagree with the experimentally measured levels unless quantum fluctuations are taken into account.
Perhaps many quantum fluctuations occurred before the birth of our universe. Most of them quickly disappeared. But one lived sufficiently long and had the right conditions for inflation to have been initiated. Thereafter, the original tiny volume inflated by an enormous factor, and our macroscopic universe was born. The original particle-antiparticle pair (or pairs) may have subsequently annihilated each other – but even if they didn’t, the violation of energy conservation would be minuscule, not large enough to be measurable.
If this admittedly speculative hypothesis is correct, then the answer to the ultimate question is that the universe is the ultimate free lunch! It came from nothing, and its total energy is zero, but it nevertheless has incredible structure and complexity. There could even be many other such universes, spatially distinct from ours.
https://www.astrosociety.org/publications/a-universe-from-nothing/
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Now my dear friend, you have every right to dispute and deride the above, but you need to remember that it was at least hypothesised by an authoritive professional expert in cosmology.
If you do dispute it, if you do question the BB model of time starting along with space at the BB, if you do question the reality of light and the fact that all dark is, is the absence of EMR, then you have a course of action open to you.
As AId has told you, you need to gather whatever evidence you do have, submit a scientific paper, and undergo appropriate peer review.
Until you do that, what you propose, remains just a fairy tale, and will make no difference to the halls of academia and science. You can infest forums such as this as much as you like with those fairy tales, and genuine students of science will continue to show you are certainly wrong.
You can also continually ignore all those links and learned folk that show you are wrong beyond any shadow of doubt, but all that does is get you permanently banned from forums such as this.
This has happened to you elsewhere, and although this particular forum is more tolerant of inane thoughts then others, even here all your threads have been banished to pseudoscience and the cesspool.
In essence, and finally, you can stubbornly resist all efforts to educate yourself as much and as long as you like, but all you will eventually do is take these inane maniacal thoughts and fairy tales to the grave with you when your time comes.
Because in the greater scheme of things, such unscientific comments and nonsense that you spew, will never make any difference to human society and the world at large.
What a wasted life!
13.83 billion years is meaningless, what you really mean to say is that we have recorded time since the big bang, a period of time within time.
No, that's just some of the nonsensical inane rubbish that you will eventually take to the grave with you.
Let me at least have one more try to resurrect you from this inane rubbish and the wasted life that you will have ahead of you.
The BB was the evolution of space and time [henceforth known as spacetime] There was no before the BB, because that was the beginning of time...t=0 at the BB.
Science is under a lot of misconception, I am 100% being honest and telling you, not asking, I am telling you, that you are wrong, science is wrong, and by the logical axiom truth's to reality I am indeed correct.
Such ranting and raving about you being 100% correct, and science being wrong is just re-enforcing the picture others have of you on this forum, and the same sort of picture that has had you banned from other forums, and your threads in this forum, banished to the wastelands.
Plus of course if you really and truly believe what you say above, then my friend, I would seriously start seeking medical attention.
Space existed before the big bang, an axiom truth, the big bang developed in time and space, and is not time and space, and to think anything else is barking mad.
No, that's not what the BB claims.
If you have another model, then gather your evidence and via the scientific method, undergo appropriate peer review.
Of course you are unable to do that, so my next suggestion is as I have already made...seek some medical attention.
