WellCookedFetus's Moderator Position

Should WellCookedFetus be removed as a Moderator?

  • Yes

    Votes: 19 43.2%
  • No

    Votes: 25 56.8%

  • Total voters
    44
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry if you disagree with how I moderate, unfortunately your examples there do not make a reason to impeach me.

and I was not being polite and respectful to you in those links you posted?
 
HOWARDSTERN said:
OOOPS......
After looking back, I see that I did spell it "their." I'm so embarrased ! ! !
biggrin.gif


No I didn't cheat.

Then I apologize for my false claim.
 
To hell with this. I spent several hours reading the off topic mud slinging of the other members at:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=40644

and then several hours merely responding politely to them at that thread, only to have it removed/split and censored by WellCookedFetus, into another thread.

While I agree that it was off topic, I didn't start the off topic slams by the other members. I notice that their off topic slams are still there.

To hell with it. I deleted my posts on the split thread and left.

I guess that I should have made a complaint at site feedback to Porfiry after all. But that's probably useless also.

Bye......
 
Hathor said:
05-17-04, 10:11 AM


James R said:
If not, perhaps it is time to close the thread.

this is astounding. is this level of commitment the administration has towards this noble experiment in democracy? is this an indication of the contempt the administration has towards the community?

your facist impulse to shut down this thread is analogous to closing down the polling station and burning the ballot boxes simply because a riot broke out. it very heavy handed and total overkill.

i made a suggestion earlier to delete posts in question as off topic. why do you not think that reasonable? edits are also an option. please consider them.

marching in here with your jackboots and threats puts you in a very bad light. i would be ashamed. but then again, that's just me

i notice paulsamuel's plea towards you. did you like that? would you like the rest of us to beg for the privilege to have our voices heard?

from here

heh, that was then

James R said:
To tiassa and Xev: You are advocating that this poll be closed prematurely. Obviously, I disagree. I say, let the vote go for the allotted time. Then we'll be done with it, one way or the other.

this is now.

see? we have james renouncing facism only to have these two tards, xev and tiassa, donning their jackboots and frantically goosetepping in unison.

i tell ya man. power does indeed make strange bedfellows.

*vomit
 
you forgot paulsamuel :D

by the way the new anti-sockpuppeting policy will make quick work of you, sorry. better hope they don't find out and with a name like that it won't be to long.
130.166.115.xx : s115n060.csun.edu
anu 130.166.115.xx
ghost of anu 130.166.115.xx
Hathor 130.166.115.xx
kazi 130.166.115.xx
 
Proof that you are a sock puppet? Or at least that one user had all of these accounts?

The possibilities... also, he does not publish your whole IP address.
 
its a lie: the speaker is trying to convince another that his new pet snake is good, especially when its eating him. bye-bye anu. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top