http://www.drcnet.org/wol/#fccruling
For my first drug-related complaint of the new year, I will overlook the coming Ashcroft-nightmare and instead note that Czar McCaffrey's attempt to buy out the media has finally settled its first round in court.
Allegations made at Salon.com last year alleged that television programs including Beverly Hills: 90210 and magazines including The Sporting News submitted script, article, and editorial material to ONDCP for review to see whether the content met certain criteria. Once the criteria were met, ONDCP relinquished its federally-guaranteed advertising spot in the show so that the producers and the network could sell it for full price. (Congress passed a law ordering networks to sell 2-for-1 advertising to ONDCP, I think, in '96 or '97.)
I've just finished searching the ONDCP site ( http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.org ) and am currently unable to find the *.pdf to register your publication or television program for advertising kickbacks, but I have somewhere a printed copy of it. When I find the address, I'll cough it up. An interesting note, though, as I searched through their site, was that their media plan is not a .pdf or .html page, but a big-ass *.ppt (Powerpoint) presentation of eighty-some slides; it's a great marketing tool, but it's kind of ridiculous when each slide you click puts a single line of new text on the page (as is the case with the Table of Contents).
But, when you see certain shows, look for tiny pre-broadcast disclaimers perhaps buried in the opening credits, and possibly as a blatant warning on the screen, depending, I suppose, on the producer and whether or not s/he's on the Fox Network. Start with Spelling shows; like we really needed ONDCP involvement to tell us that old man's a whore. Of course, I would submit that Spelling shows, lacking quality in general, need as much support as they can get. I wonder if he would have put the money out for Tori if she was busted for cocaine? Or would he have blamed the media culture?
But, my fellow Americans must now be warned when the government is paying for the privilege of writing their favorite television shows. I guess it's like anything else. If I see something that stupid, then I can look away. At least now we'll know who's selling out to the government.
thanx,
Tiassa
------------------
Whether God exists or does not exist, He has come to rank among the most sublime and useless truths.--Denis Diderot
"WARNING: This program contains material lobbying for support of current drug policies, paid for at taxpayer expense."
While viewers of "The Drew Carey Show" or "America's Most Wanted" may never see that admonition flash on their TV screens, the FCC wants them to know when the government is attempting to sway them. Ruling on a complaint filed by the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) this week ordered the major networks to begin identifying the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) as a sponsor of shows that include anti-drug messages underwritten by the federal government
For my first drug-related complaint of the new year, I will overlook the coming Ashcroft-nightmare and instead note that Czar McCaffrey's attempt to buy out the media has finally settled its first round in court.
"We have been told by these programmers that they have influenced the programs in order to please the government. That is not the kind of free press we have grown accustomed to," Stroup said.
Allegations made at Salon.com last year alleged that television programs including Beverly Hills: 90210 and magazines including The Sporting News submitted script, article, and editorial material to ONDCP for review to see whether the content met certain criteria. Once the criteria were met, ONDCP relinquished its federally-guaranteed advertising spot in the show so that the producers and the network could sell it for full price. (Congress passed a law ordering networks to sell 2-for-1 advertising to ONDCP, I think, in '96 or '97.)
I've just finished searching the ONDCP site ( http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.org ) and am currently unable to find the *.pdf to register your publication or television program for advertising kickbacks, but I have somewhere a printed copy of it. When I find the address, I'll cough it up. An interesting note, though, as I searched through their site, was that their media plan is not a .pdf or .html page, but a big-ass *.ppt (Powerpoint) presentation of eighty-some slides; it's a great marketing tool, but it's kind of ridiculous when each slide you click puts a single line of new text on the page (as is the case with the Table of Contents).
But, when you see certain shows, look for tiny pre-broadcast disclaimers perhaps buried in the opening credits, and possibly as a blatant warning on the screen, depending, I suppose, on the producer and whether or not s/he's on the Fox Network. Start with Spelling shows; like we really needed ONDCP involvement to tell us that old man's a whore. Of course, I would submit that Spelling shows, lacking quality in general, need as much support as they can get. I wonder if he would have put the money out for Tori if she was busted for cocaine? Or would he have blamed the media culture?
But, my fellow Americans must now be warned when the government is paying for the privilege of writing their favorite television shows. I guess it's like anything else. If I see something that stupid, then I can look away. At least now we'll know who's selling out to the government.
thanx,
Tiassa
------------------
Whether God exists or does not exist, He has come to rank among the most sublime and useless truths.--Denis Diderot