Walmart Changes Logo

superstring01

Moderator
In conspicuous yet ho-hum news...

Wal-Mart Plans New Logo to Update Image
By ANN ZIMMERMAN
June 28, 2008; Page B7

Wal-Mart%27s_official_new_logo.jpg


Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is about to change one of the most familiar logos in corporate America.

Part of Wal-Mart's continuing effort to update its once-dowdy image, the new logo for signs and building facades includes white letters on a burnt-orange background followed by a white starburst, according to an artist's rendering that the company filed recently with planning officials in Memphis, Tenn.

In a change, the name will appear as one word: Walmart. When the company first started in 1962, the name was hyphenated by a dash. But in the past decade, the dash has been replaced by a star on stores and the corporate letterhead.

Initially, the store logo included white letters on a brown brick exterior. About 20 years ago, Wal-Mart moved to a sign that affixed white letters onto a battleship blue/gray background, bordered by red strips.

Wal-Mart hasn't officially unveiled the new design, and the company didn't return repeated calls for comment.

The new white-and-orange logo came to light when it was used for a new store prototype proposed last week for a Wal-Mart Supercenter in Shelby County outside Memphis.

Chip Saliba, a manager with the Memphis/Shelby County office of planning and development, said engineers for the company told him that this was the new sign package that the company is unveiling soon. Casey Wilder, an engineer at Carlson Consulting Engineers Inc. in Bartlett, Tenn., confirmed the conversation.

"They have had the most dull, boring signs for 30 years," Mr. Saliba said. "The new one is kind of funky looking, but I like it," he added.

Dennis Alpert, senior manager of public affairs and government relations for Wal-Mart in Tennessee, referred calls to Wal-Mart's headquarters in Bentonville, Ark. But the Memphis Business Journal reported Thursday that Mr. Alpert said Wal-Mart's new corporate logo would be officially unveiled this coming week.

On the bottom of graphics accompanying the Wal-Mart application, the corporate logo is written in blue letters followed by an orange starburst.

The store signs on Wal-Mart's approximately 3,600 existing U.S. stores won't be taken down wholesale, but they will be changed over time, says a person close to the company.

Wal-Mart's new starburst logo mimics the cleaner, brighter sign of competitor Target Corp., with its iconic red-and-white bull's-eye.

Wal-Mart has attempted in several ways to update its image in recent years. Gone from almost all its signage is the once-ubiquitous yellow smiley face.

Last year, Wal-Mart also changed its corporate uniform for store workers, retiring bulky blue polyester vests in favor of khakis and polo shirts similar to those favored by Target and other retail chains.

In the past decade, as Wal-Mart ramped up store growth and moved from rural areas into suburban and urban markets, it encountered increasing opposition from neighborhood groups and city planners who objected to what they contended was the uniformly ugly look and size of the stores, which averaged about 200,000 square feet.

In recent years, Wal-Mart has tried to assuage neighborhood groups, making concessions on size and offering facades that better blend into the surrounding neighborhoods, from timber gables in Colorado to pastel stucco in Florida.

--Gary McWilliams contributed to this article.
 
Aren't triangles and circles like AOL and other companies part of the pyramid and all seeing eye of the illuminati. Is Wal-Mart part of the illuminati?
 
But... but... the little asterisk-starburst thingy doesn't fill you with a sense of warmth and hope?

~String
Actually, it prompts me to think that the slogan Save Money. Live Better comes with mysterious 'qualifications' which are explained in ever-so-wee fine print somewhere - you know, like -*brought to you by Red Chinese slave labor, or some such...
:D


Other than that it looks damned stupid.

I hope they didn't pay too much for some ad agency to come up with that crap !
 
Actually, it prompts me to think that the slogan Save Money. Live Better comes with mysterious 'qualifications' which are explained in ever-so-wee fine print somewhere - you know, like -*brought to you by Red Chinese slave labor, or some such...
:D

I hope they didn't pay too much for some ad agency to come up with that crap !

I think you are right - it looks like an asterisk. That 1000 page fineprint is in a vault!

That fine print may include: "We shall sell no merchandise for the minority as that is too expensive. We shall sell no merchadise from local area where we operate...we shall make sure you live just like the workers in the third world where our suppliers are located.....etc...."
 
Last edited:
Actually, WM pays better wages than most of the rest box peddlers and famous "mom&pop" stores (selling the same imported stuff). As a rule, WM sells cheaper (not always though). WM is being accused of screwing suppliers of most of their profits. OK, a box store accross the road is not big enough to screw suppliers big time, but it pays smaller wages than WM while charging more for the same imported junk.
 
Actually, WM pays better wages than most of the rest box peddlers and famous "mom&pop" stores (selling the same imported stuff). As a rule, WM sells cheaper (not always though). WM is being accused of screwing suppliers of most of their profits. OK, a box store accross the road is not big enough to screw suppliers big time, but it pays smaller wages than WM while charging more for the same imported junk.

Inspite of that...there is a lot of walmart workers that are on food stamps....
 
I don't get it, out of all box stores WM probably one of the best compensationwise. Yet, it's being blamed first for foodstamps for its workers.
Something is not right here.
 
I don't get it, out of all box stores WM probably one of the best compensationwise. Yet, it's being blamed first for foodstamps for its workers.
Something is not right here.

Either they are the best or others are the worst. Exploitation of workers during an economic slump is not new. Remember when IT folks used to command super high salaries? Well, that is why Bill Gates and others are pushing to bring in cheap labor from overseas. From management view point, techno-labor is same as coolies of 18th century - a commodity....
 
From management standpoint everything is commodity, except their super unique skills.

BTW, WM drivers are among the best paid in USA. I hauled WM trailers too (if WM is short for drivers in their Distribution Centers, it "rents" them&their truck from other companies) , $200/day no matter how many miles driven, beats hell out of my or any other trucking company's wages.

I do agree that WM is "evil" but not because it pays too little. As I said, WM is among the best box stores salarywise. If insufficient worker's compensation is to be critisized, WM should be somewhere in the end of an "attack list". BTW, surviving Mom&Pop stores frequently pay LESS than minimum wages, they are true predators preying on the superdesperates. Many of the box stores (but WM) utilize illegals to clean store floors, etc. No, no I'm not talking about illegals working for a "legit" cleaning company. I'm talking about unaffiliated illegals working strictly for cash at the end of cleaning.
 
Last edited:
I hope they didn't pay too much for some ad agency to come up with that crap !

Are you kidding? From personal experience with logos, this asterisk / sphincter cost them at least $US 50,000.00, minimum.
 
Back
Top