Originally Posted by spidergoat
There was a retraction from the source, which is the only thing that matters. Doesn't it matter to you that you base your criticism of evolution on a misquote?
Originally Posted by Origin
Of course not! He doesn't want evolution to be true (for whatever reason) so he has to grasp at something, regardless if it is false or not. He thinks facts, data and observations are simply annoying details that get in the way of what he wants to believe.
leopold claims Science published no retraction.
Here is a link to the article, with the retraction inserted. It states that it is reprinted with the permission of Science:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070928082833/http://dim.com/~jambo/evolution/lewin.html