its weak and stinks of feet,
Isn't that a contradiction in terms?
You should receive an infraction for contradicting yourself.
No Soup for YOU!!
its weak and stinks of feet,
I like the basic idea. I'd hate to be a 'Senior Registered User' forever. I want to progress; to go places. I want a reward for all my efforts.invert_nexus said:I also move that the senior member be changed to something more imaginative.
Yawn, boring. Although I quite like the idea of new users being plebs. But I think it should be based on popstars. You start off as Phil Collins or someone shite like that who no-one listens to any more, and work your way up to Britney Spears.Something based on the Roman Senate perhaps.
I know. It's going to be so delightfully apocalyptic. The hum and the fizz. The smell of the sulphur. Let the chaos begin.Every ban should be made because of a conscious human decision. Not automated machine action... It is guaranteed to cause trouble.
But I think it should be based on popstars. You start off as Phil Collins or someone shite like that who no-one listens to any more, and work your way up to Britney Spears..
because everyone listens to her?? wow...now thats a goal :bugeye:
Positively screaming at you:
"Click me! Click me, motherfucker!! CLICK ME!!!!!!!!!"
Yes they do. *evil glare*because everyone listens to her?? wow...now thats a goal :bugeye:
hmmm id have thought that mods and admins could see infractions that have been handed out
They're horny for your click. You can click them loooooong time.the red-yellow twins are tempting.
But wait, that's it - celebrities!! You start off as Tom Cruise or some other loser and work your way up to de Niro or some other icon of effortless cool. Why, it's ingenious!Hey! I worship the words of The Greats, which includes such influential people as Paris Hilton and Alec Baldwin.
But wait, that's it - celebrities!! You start off as Tom Cruise or some other loser and work your way up to de Niro or some other icon of effortless cool. Why, it's ingenious!
And how do you check your infractions, anyway?
...STILL no infractions against me?
Demostration yes, as for unsuitability thats still premature to make a decision on.
How exquisitely complicated. Hark, can you hear the hounds of Beelzebub?Demostration yes, as for unsuitability thats still premature to make a decision on.
For instance if GeoffP suddenly has a bunch of people giving him infractions it could show abuse, however those people that give the infractions would be potentially "dicing with death" in the sense that their un-necessary infractions would potentially cause them to suffer a worse fate than GeoffP would should he end up with an inflated Infraction list.
It could be then questioned that GeoffP baiting people to give him Infractions is in itself an Infraction, since he's asking for mayhem.
I would suggest posters do not give GeoffP infractions for his post in this instance and he should be "Warned" not to incite riots in regards to baiting infractions. (Let it be a warning to all, Don't Bait for infractions as that will not be taken lightly in the future.)
Look to the sky, way up on high
There in the night stars are now right.
Eons have passed: now then at last
Prison walls break, Old Ones awake!
They will return: mankind will learn
New kinds of fear when they are here.
They will reclaim all in their name;
Hopes turn to black when they come back.
Ignorant fools, mankind now rules
Where they ruled then: it's theirs again
Stars brightly burning, boiling and churning
Bode a returning season of doom
Scary scary scary scary solstice
Very very very scary solstice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ftld7Ohojg
They will return...
How exquisitely complicated. Hark, can you hear the hounds of Beelzebub?