UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

[James R]

LOL I just posted 7 videos showing these metallic spheres flying thru the air with no control surfaces or propellers.

How do you know they are metallic? Who determined that they are metallic, and how did they determine that?

We have no technology like that.

Er... Party balloons have no control surfaces or propellers.

I have also posted in this thread many cases of uaps performing feats of flight defying the known laws of physics.

None of which have been confirmed by anybody. Not a single one.

Full speed 90 degrees turns, instantaneous acceleration and stopping, and no visible means of thermal propulsion seen thru FLIR cameras.

How did a FLIR camera see something that wasn't generating any heat?

The Nimitz tic tac video is the obvious example of this.

The Nimitz tic tac object has not been identified.

It was also observed coming up out the sea.

Who observed it coming out of the sea? Who confirmed that it did that? How was it confirmed?

Again we have no such technology.

Are you asserting that things can't emerge from the sea, now? Seriously? What a clown you are.

 

[Magical Realist]

.....

 

[Magical Realist]

Who measured a speed of Mach 2? What equipment did they use? How did they verify that the "sphere" was actually going at Mach 2?

"Navy jet radars can determine the speed of a target aircraft by utilizing the Doppler effect, which measures the shift in frequency of the radar wave reflected off a moving object, allowing the radar system to calculate the target's relative velocity.


Key points about radar and speed detection:

• Doppler shift:
  When a radar pulse hits a moving target, the reflected wave returns at a slightly different frequency compared to the original pulse, which is directly related to the target's speed.
  
  
  
• Calculating speed:
  The radar system analyzes the Doppler shift to determine the target's relative speed towards or away from the radar.
  
  
  
• Accuracy:
  The accuracy of speed determination depends on various factors like the radar system's capabilities, target size, and distance."

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

And did they do all that in the instances you promote? Or was that just another irrelevant post of yours? Red herrings stink like bad fish.

 

[James R]

Repeated identical accounts of these things doing extraordinary things isn't misidentifying anything. It's simply reporting what was observed by the pilots over and over again. That's confirmation that what they saw is real.

Nobody is as stupid as you pretend to be. It's impossible that you're still this clueless after years of being patiently schooled to try to correct these basic errors of yours. Salient points, for the umpteenth time:

1. Reporting what was observed is one thing. Reporting one's assumptions about what caused what was observed is a different thing.
2. Anecdotes are not, in themselves, confirmation of the truth of the content of the anecdotes.
3. People make mistakes.
4. People have poor memories.
5. People have biases.
6. Some people are motivated to lie, by money, notoriety and many other factors.

 

[James R]

"Navy jet radars can determine the speed of a target aircraft by utilizing the Doppler effect, which measures the shift in frequency of the radar wave reflected off a moving object, allowing the radar system to calculate the target's relative velocity.

I see. And in the Nimitz case there is a public record of a navy jet radar measuring the speed of a "flying sphere" at Mach 2, is there?

Where can I find that?

 

[DaveC426913]

Nobody is as stupid as you pretend to be. It's impossible that you're still this clueless after years of being patiently schooled to try to correct these basic errors of yours. Salient points, for the umpteenth time:

1. Reporting what was observed is one thing. Reporting one's assumptions about what caused what was observed is a different thing.
2. Anecdotes are not, in themselves, confirmation of the truth of the content of the anecdotes.
3. People make mistakes.
4. People tells lies.
5. People have poor memories.
6. People have biases.
7. Some people are motivated to lie, by money, notoriety and many other factors.

7a. and trolling.

 

[James R]

Define critical thinking and tell us how it differs from regular thinking.

It is not plausible, following your years on sciforums, that you remain blissfully ignorant of what critical thinking involves.

You're walking a very fine line with your clowning, Magical Realist. Keep it up and it will be another holiday for you.

 

[Magical Realist]

JamesR blathers: What a clown you are.

Nobody is as stupid as you pretend to be. It's impossible that you're still this clueless

you remain blissfully ignorant

You're walking a very fine line with your clowning, Magical Realist. Keep it up and it will be another holiday for you.

You're fast sinking to the same shit level as all your other troll buddies here. Tell me, as chief moderator here, do you actually see this as exemplary behavior on your part? And do you actually believe such childishness deserves any kind of serious response whatsoever on my part?

 

[James R]

You're fast sinking to the same shit level as all your other troll buddies here. Tell me, as chief moderator here, do you actually see this as exemplary behavior on your part? And do you actually believe such childishness deserves any kind of serious response on my part?

I see you have chosen, as usual, to ignore the specific objections to your nonsense that I have detailed, both in this thread and elsewhere.

Instead, you try to pretend that I have some kind of personal issue with you and wish to persecute you because, you will allege, I fear my "worldview" is threatened by all the bullshit you serve up.

Your continual dishonesty has gotten old fast, Magical Realist. Your clowning has long past the point where it is amusing to anybody except yourself.

It's a real shame that this is apparently the best you have to offer. You've managed to completely destroy your credibility here, over the years. Now, you're reduced to just going through the motions, over and over. It's quite sad, actually.

 

[wegs]

I wonder if Trump’s administration will spend more or less money on UAP / UFO sightings. He’s cutting waste so maybe we’ll finally have the money to build a welcome center for the Mother Ship. It has to be coming, soon.

 

[Magical Realist]

Here's a good overview on the current state of the uap phenomena. We are currently undergoing a paradigm shift towards the public acceptance of its realness and a strong desire to find out what they are and what their agenda is. Trump may actually prove to be helpful in this regard by releasing scores of previously classified uap videos.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I wonder if Trump’s administration will spend more or less money on UAP / UFO sightings. He’s cutting waste so maybe we’ll finally have the money to build a welcome center for the Mother Ship. It has to be coming, soon.

The Mother is here!

 

[wegs]

Here's a good overview on the current state of the uap phenomena. We are currently undergoing a paradigm shift towards the public acceptance of its realness and a strong desire to find out what they are and what their agenda is. Trump may actually prove to be helpful in this regard by releasing scores of previously classified uap videos.

He might be good for something. Hang on to your tin foil hats, everyone!

 

[DaveC426913]

Here's a good overview on

Reported for trolling.

 

[DaveC426913]

Sorry. Sorry about that. Muscle memory and all.

Carry on.

 

[wegs]

Not really trolling - he’s posting something related to my Trump comment. I wasn’t trolling either, btw. I’m genuinely curious as to how Trump will handle space exploration in general, and UAP’s.

 

[Magical Realist]

Pretty much typical for Drama Dave..

 

[(Q)]

Here's a good overview on the current state of the uap phenomena. We are currently undergoing a paradigm shift towards the public acceptance of its realness and a strong desire to find out what they are and what their agenda is.

No, not really, the same dum dums who already believe in aliens will unlikely attract the people who don't.

Trump may actually prove to be helpful in this regard by releasing scores of previously classified uap videos.

And, those videos will unlikely offer any more evidence for aliens than we already have, which is nothing.

 

[Magical Realist]

Compelling video captured in 2016 by a drone filming for a documentary in Beaver Utah of a uap zooming by at a high rate of speed. The video is submitted for extensive forensic analysis by an expert and found to be authentic. The uap is calculated to be going 2 miles in 2 seconds, which is 3600 mph!