Do you believe that is the actual video is real? It's not, someone made the video as an illustration as to what the officers saw. The only thing we have is the recording over the radio and his eyewitness account.
UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?
- Thread starter Magical Realist
- Start date
Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
You've checked the provenance thoroughly, or did you take it because you like it?
Hey moron, it's not a real video in the sense that the bright orange glow thingy was filmed by the officers. There is only the audio recording.
Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
Jaw-dropping revelations from today's Congressional UAP hearing. I never dared believe this until now! It's time to pay the piper Pentagon!
Last edited:
Great, two brain dead Maga morons, Mace and Grothman spear-heading the waste of millions of taxpayer dollars. What a joke.
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
Straining at gnats and swallowing whales, that's the hallmark of the conspiracy nut.
Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
Fascinating document from the Congressional uap hearing today. Documents the results of a multiyear internal investigation into uaps, technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligences. Especially interesting are the various types of uaps researched and their distinct characteristics..
Loading…
www.congress.gov
Last edited:
What a waste of time, money and resources. All of this the result of stupid people wasting taxpayer dollars. Shameful.
TheVat
Registered Senior Member
Absolutely! It was jaw-dropping that he revealed he had signed an NDA which did not allow him to disclose any details or evidence of any actual UAP that has been retrieved.
Basically Elizondo repeated David Grusch’s claims from 2023, telling Rep. Mace that the government has conducted secret UAP crash-retrieval programs meant to identify and reverse-engineer alien craft.
So did they mean to do that or did they actually do that? All we have are tidbits like a vague allusion to compensation to military personnel injured during a "retrieval." What personnel? What sort of injury? What was retrieved? Oh right, NDA!
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
I took abnormal pysch classes at Purdue, the then wife was into serial killers. She dropped by the wayside but I had the bug. Not going to use that level of response here, little crazies would cry.
TheVat
Registered Senior Member
(slightly more information than that WGN clip)
But still rumor-dense and information-poor.
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
It literally couldn't be better than that. There's nothing to work with.
TheVat
Registered Senior Member
That often happens, with serial killers.
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
Snarf.
Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
Yes...that's called corroborating testimony. Do you think they are both just making it up? Why?
Representative Mace makes a good point:
“So if there is no ‘there’ there, then why are we spending money on it, and by how much? Why the secrecy if it’s really no big deal and there’s nothing there, why hide it from the American people? Because I’m not a mathematician, but I can tell you that doesn’t add up,” she said.
So why all these pages and pages of blacked out text? What are they hiding? How much will be continued to be lied about and covered up all in the name of national security?
Loading…
oversight.house.gov
Last edited:
Attention seekers, you know the type.
Probably somebody tripped over his own feet, or a twig, while trying to search for something to retrieve, and so had to be compensated for an injury suffered during the course of his employment.
Of course, we'll probably never know for sure, because this kind of stuff is super secret and has to be protected with NDAs.
Who is the author?
Internal to what? Who conducted the investigation?
None of the UAPs in the document appears to have been "researched".
Who did the research? Where are the results?
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
Why you ask all those trick questions?