Anything else you wanna bitch about?
This
is thread about presenting and analyzing evidence for UAPs, so it's pretty disingenuous to complain when someone challenges your presentation and analysis.
And
you did say it's spherical. You weren't just parroting what the video told you, since you included the spherical comments as
part and parcel of your
own analysis, including thinking you saw wjndows and, in fact, compared it directly to "many UFOs" and suggest it is some sort of craft.
So maybe a little
mea culpa would be the more respectable thing to do here.
But, rather than that, since you chose instead to get defensive and critical, that justifies subsequent challenge:
Eventually. Once someone else
told you what to think.
But first, you wrote your own "analysis".
How much time did you spend analyzing before deciding you couldn't think of a mundane explanation?
Why did you never even bother to
consider that the artifact could have been added digitally to the video?
Do you think that this (your analysis) was a shining example of your critical thinking prowess?
When all is said and done, you were of zero help in analyzing the video to reach the
truth. You took the video at face value, and furthered a narrative that turned out (with trivial effort) to be quite false.
Do you maybe want to change your mind about whether you think critical thinking is just hogwash? Do you think that maybe a little bit more skepticism might work toward your goals?
