UAP Encounter from 1886 Scientific American

Ivan Seeking

Valued Senior Member
UAP Encounter from 1886 Scientific American

The text from the original letter to the editor is shown after the data and analysis: The key points are highlighted first. Over twenty years ago I contacted Scientific American and confirmed that the original report was in fact published in 1886. Recently I was reviewing this and realized the victims must have received fantastically high levels of radiation; far beyond what is produced by any natural source. All of the data provided is easily confirmed with a quick search.

Being nine years before radiation was discovered, the report far too accurately describes acute radiation poisoning and other effects, to be coincidence. The report must be genuine. Next, the linked chart shows a graph of the time-to-vomiting based on dose of ionizing radiation. The victims reported that they started vomiting almost immediately. That indicates they received a dose over 10 and approaching 100 Joules of ionizing radiation per Kg of body mass, in a matter of a minute or so. The victims certainly all died.

https://remm.hhs.gov/aboutvomiting.htm

There is no known natural phenomenon or any even imagined that could produce the level of radiation required to explain this event as natural in origin. This level of radiation can only be produced using technology. So, we have a report that must be genuine, that describes events due to something that must have been an unknown, advanced technology, in 1886. And there was certainly no such human technology at that time. The only remaining explanation is that this was due to a non-human or future-human technology.

Here’s the standard radiation-biology ballpark, expressed in gray (Gy = J/kg) to the skin:
  • ~2–3 Gy → transient erythema (reddening)
  • ~6–10 Gy → more intense erythema, itching, swelling
  • ~10–15 Gy → dry desquamation (peeling)
  • ~15–25 Gy → moist desquamation and blistering
  • >25–30 Gy → ulceration, necrosis, possible permanent damage
Blisters typically begin to appear at roughly 15–25 Gy delivered to the skin, depending on conditions.

The report indicated their skin began to blister almost immediately and was necrotized the next day; again suggesting exposure levels of at least 25 grays
A whole‑body dose of:
• 1–2 Gy → causes radiation sickness
• 4–6 Gy → often fatal without aggressive medical care
• >10 Gy → universally fatal
• 30 Gy → causes immediate, catastrophic biological damage

What can produce this level of radiation?

To deliver 30 Gy at 50 feet to a 100 kg person, the source must be something on the scale of:
  1. Large industrial gamma irradiators
  • These use cobalt‑60 or cesium‑137 in quantities of hundreds of thousands of curies.
  • At close range, they can produce dose rates high enough to deliver tens of grays in minutes.
  • They are housed in heavily shielded facilities because unshielded exposure is fatal almost instantly.
2. Spent nuclear fuel assemblies
  • Freshly removed fuel rods emit intense gamma and neutron radiation.
  • At a few meters, unshielded exposure can reach tens of grays per second.
  • They are stored underwater specifically to shield this radiation.
3. Criticality accidents
An accidental, uncontrolled fission chain reaction can produce a burst of neutrons and gamma rays.

Historical criticality events have delivered 20–40 Gy to workers several meters away.

Letter to Scientific American December 18, 1886:
CURIOUS PHENOMENON IN VENEZUELA

To the Editor of the Scientific American: The following brief account of a recent strange meteorological occurrence may be of interest to your readers as an addition to the list of electrical eccentricities: During the night of the 24th of October last, which was rainy and tempestuous, a family of nine persons, sleeping in a hut a few leagues from Maracaibo, were awakened by a loud humming noise and a vivid, dazzling light, which brilliantly illuminated the interior of the house. The occupants completely terror stricken, and believing, as they relate, that the end of the world had come, threw themselves on their knees and commenced to pray, but their devotions were almost immediately interrupted by violent vomitings, and extensive swellings commenced to appear in the upper part of their bodies, this being particularly noticeable about the face and lips. It is to be noted that the brilliant lights was not accompanied by a sensation of heat, although there was a smoky appearance and a peculiar smell. The next morning, the swellings had subsided, leaving upon the face and body large black blotches. No special pain was felt until the ninth day, when the skin peeled off, and these blotches were transformed into virulent raw sores. The hair of the head fell off upon the side which happened to be underneath when the phenomenon occurred, the same side of the body being , in all nine cases, the more seriously injured. The remarkable part of the occurrence is that the house was uninjured, all doors and windows being closed at the time. No trace of lightning could afterward by observed in any part of the building, and all the sufferers unite in saying that there was no detonation, but only the loud humming already mentioned. Another curious attendant circumstance is that the trees around the house showed no signs of injury until the ninth day, when they suddenly withered, almost simultaneously with the development of the sores upon the bodies of the occupants of the house. This is perhaps a mere coincidence, but it is remarkable that the same susceptibility to electrical effects, with the same lapse of time, should be observed in both animal and vegetable organisms. I have visited the sufferers, who are now in one of the hospitals of this city; and although their appearance is truly horrible, yet it is hoped that in no case will the injuries prove fatal.

Warner Cowgill. U. S. Consulate, Maracaibo, Venezuela November 17, 1886
 
Last edited:
While this does sound like an exposure of > 10 grays, I don't see how one could rule out some other anomalous event which produces similar symptoms. Severe electrical shock can produce similar symptoms and this bit...

"The hair of the head fell off upon the side which happened to be underneath when the phenomenon occurred, the same side of the body being , in all nine cases, the more seriously injured."

....is consistent with a lightning strike, where heaviest tissue damage is closest to wherever the current is grounding. I.e. the ground.

Ockham's Razor would be useful here in assessing the probability of lightning strike compared to alien spaceship blasting people with radiation. Since no one in a Venezuelan hut was equipped with a radiation dosimeter in 1886, there's really no way to decisively pinpoint elevated radiation levels.
 
....is consistent with a lightning strike, where heaviest tissue damage is closest to wherever the current is grounding. I.e. the ground.
This is an area of Venezuela that is famous for extensive high-level lightning storms.
 
Yellow journalism was widespread in publications of the 19th-century, which included numerous sci-fi affairs like mystery airships. Scientific magazines could be vulnerable to similar sensationalism, especially when the stories were actually lifted from local newspapers. As evidenced by The Zoologist in 1868, which carried a report about a gigantic "strange bird" dominating the skies over a mining operation in another South American country: Chili.
  • https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28358117#page/295/mode/1up

    A Strange Bird -- Copiapo, Chili April, 1868.

    Yesterday, at about five o'clock in the afternoon, when the daily labours in this mine were over, and all the workmen were together awaiting their supper, we saw coming through the air, from the side of the ternera, a gigantic bird, which at first sight we took for one of the clouds then partially darkening the atmosphere, supposing it to have been separated from the rest by the wind.

    Its course was from north-west to south-east; its flight rapid and in a straight line. As it was passing a short distance above our heads we could mark the strange formation of its body.

    Its immense wings were clothed with a grayish plumage, its monstrous head was like that of a locust, its eyes were wide open and shone like burning coals; it seemed to be covered with something resembling the thick and stout bristles of a boar, while on its body, elongated like that of a serpent, we could only see brilliant scales, which clashed together with a metallic sound as the strange animal turned its body in its fight. — Copiapo (Chili) paper.
 
While this does sound like an exposure of > 10 grays, I don't see how one could rule out some other anomalous event which produces similar symptoms. Severe electrical shock can produce similar symptoms and this bit...
No, it can't.
 
Yellow journalism was widespread in publications of the 19th-century, which included numerous sci-fi affairs like mystery airships. Scientific magazines could be vulnerable to similar sensationalism, especially when the stories were actually lifted from local newspapers. As evidenced by The Zoologist in 1868, which carried a report about a gigantic "strange bird" dominating the skies over a mining operation in another South American country: Chili.
  • https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28358117#page/295/mode/1up

    A Strange Bird -- Copiapo, Chili April, 1868.

    Yesterday, at about five o'clock in the afternoon, when the daily labours in this mine were over, and all the workmen were together awaiting their supper, we saw coming through the air, from the side of the ternera, a gigantic bird, which at first sight we took for one of the clouds then partially darkening the atmosphere, supposing it to have been separated from the rest by the wind.

    Its course was from north-west to south-east; its flight rapid and in a straight line. As it was passing a short distance above our heads we could mark the strange formation of its body.

    Its immense wings were clothed with a grayish plumage, its monstrous head was like that of a locust, its eyes were wide open and shone like burning coals; it seemed to be covered with something resembling the thick and stout bristles of a boar, while on its body, elongated like that of a serpent, we could only see brilliant scales, which clashed together with a metallic sound as the strange animal turned its body in its fight. — Copiapo (Chili) paper.
So, the US Consulate to Venezuela just happened to fabricate an exact description of severe radiation poisoning, with five key features that are dead on right down to the timing and dosage, nine years before we discovered radiation, and sent a letter to Scientific American in the US for publication.

Ok, if you say so.
 
The only case of any kind I have ever heard that is remotely similar to this is a famous UFO case - The Cash-Landrum event.
 
Correction, there are six key features in addition to the dose and timing being consistent with very high levels of radiation

We have the vomiting, blistering, necrosis, hair loss and severe, increasing injury noted to both the victims as well as the trees around the house, on the ninth day. They also reported a peculiar smell. We would expect significant ionization of the air due to severe ionizing radiation.

My bad, one more note that I missed. Highly ionized air can appear smokey. And again, this indicates the radiation levels were extremely high.

From MS Copilot

When this actually happens: Normal radiation fields—even high ones—don’t make air visibly hazy. You need extreme ionization densities, such as:
• the sheath around a nuclear detonation in the first milliseconds
• the leader channels of lightning
• high‑energy particle beams in air
very intense gamma bursts near pulsed reactors or accelerators
In those environments, observers report a ghostly, fog‑like glow or a bluish haze around the ionized region.
 
Last edited:
Correction, there are six key features in addition to the dose and timing being consistent with very high levels of radiation

We have the vomiting, blistering, necrosis, hair loss and severe, increasing injury noted to both the victims as well as the trees around the house, on the ninth day. They also reported a peculiar smell. We would expect significant ionization of the air due to severe ionizing radiation.
This was 140 years ago in tropical country. There are some pretty nasty things around today let alone pre anti biotic, pre modern medicine. It would be interesting to find out what could cause necrosis quickly, lots of things cause necrosis (and vomiting obviously)
 
This was 140 years ago in tropical country. There are some pretty nasty things around today let alone pre anti biotic, pre modern medicine. It would be interesting to find out what could cause necrosis quickly, lots of things cause necrosis (and vomiting obviously)
We already know: Radiation. This was a singular event that occurred in minutes.

This isn't some kind of biological event. We know that. Nothing like that can begin to explain what happened.
 
So, the US Consulate to Venezuela just happened to fabricate an exact description of severe radiation poisoning, with five key features that are dead on right down to the timing and dosage, nine years before we discovered radiation, and sent a letter to Scientific American in the US for publication.

Ok, if you say so.
You keep using the word "must".

If you go into this with the foregone conclusion that it must actually be severe radiation poisioning, then indeed that is the only one possible conclusion you can arrive at. But that is not an open-minded rational appoach; it is a self-fulfilling approach. You have your answer - the only one you're willing to consider - is there anything more to discuss?


That is not the job of a scientist. The job of a scientist is to do everything he can to falsify his hypothesis. The requires eschewing "must" statements.

And even if he can't find any alternate explanation, that still does not point toward any alien solution, all it does is more stongly point toward "it's a mystery". That's critical.

"It can't be anything we've thought of" does not equate to "therefore all that's left is aliens". Those are not the same.

Even if we were to eliminate all possible known physics, 'alien' is a whopping huge leap beyond scores of less exotic hypeotheses. Have you ruled out a type of ball lightning we've never encountered before? Have you ruled out a type of radiation exposure we're never encountered before?

Hypotheses like this require far, far fewer 'multiplication of entities' than aliens. Why shoot right past them?

Examples:
We know that ball lightning happens. A novel type may surely be implausible but at least it's an offshoot of something that already exists.
We know that, say, volcanoes spew noxious gasses that kill. A novel type may surely be implausible but at least it's an offshoot of something that already exists.
We know that, say, certain lakes can emit noxious gasses that kill. A novel type may surely be implausible but at least it's an offshoot of something that already exists.

I am not suggesting that any of these are answers, what I am asking is why would you jump way past things for which there is at least some precedent all the way to aliens - who require the invention of an entire civilization as a predicate for their presence?




So I have a question for you: Which is more important to you? To find answers? Or to find aliens? What if they diverge? Are you still willing to look for answers, even if the answers don't point toward aliens?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: C C
We already know: Radiation. This was a singular event that occurred in minutes.
No we don't. That's an interpretation based on "we haven't thought of anything else" logic.

That is not the same as "knowing".

Nothing like that can begin to explain what happened.
Neither can aliens.

Because:
There is zero evidence that aliens have radioactive spaceships.
This is subsumed by the fact that there is zero evidence that aliens have spaceships.
And that is subsumed by the fact that there is zero evidence of aliens.

Notice I am not poo-pooing the entire concept of aliens and spaceships in principle, nor am I insulting you - all I am doing is calling out faulty logic and hasty/foregone conclusions, and correcting them with facts.
 
So, the US Consulate to Venezuela [...]

Cowgill relates an anecdote -- from whom or what source? He says he visited these people in a hospital, but what informed him about their existence to begin with? A local newspaper account? A conversation overheard in a lobby? The patients presumably could supply him with some details, but the story prior to that must have already been pretty fantastic, in order to draw him to the hospital.

We don't know much about Warner Cowgill, apart from the below. That he was a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, and "was serving as a foreign service officer with the U.S. State Department stationed in Venezuela". We don't if he was gullible with respect to tales and embellishments from the locals, or prone to exaggerations on his own part. To vet it further, apparently the great Global Body of Space Alien Addicts itself has been unable to dig up both a journalistic record of this incident and a medical record from the historical files of Maracaibo, Venezuela.
[...] just happened to fabricate an exact description of severe radiation poisoning, with five key features that are dead on right down to the timing and dosage, nine years before we discovered radiation, and sent a letter to Scientific American in the US for publication. Ok, if you say so.

So based on descriptive coincidences -- in even ancient texts -- we're likewise to supposed to conclude that there was radiation poisoning thousands of years ago (from nuclear explosions)? Commence the Ancient Astronauts anthem as the late von Däniken's ghost enters the foyer...
  • 8,000 Year Old Indian City Irradiated by Atomic Blast
    https://www.indiadivine.org/8000-year-old-indian-city-irradiated-by-atomic-blast/

    EXCERPT: The Mahabharata clearly describes a catastrophic blast that rocked the continent.

    “A single projectile charged with all the power in the Universe… An incandescent column of smoke and flame as bright as 10,000 suns, rose in all its splendor… It was an unknown weapon, an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death which reduced to ashes an entire race. The corpses were so burned as to be unrecognizable. Their hair and nails fell out, pottery broke without any apparent cause, and the birds turned white. After a few hours, all foodstuffs were infected. To escape from this fire, the soldiers threw themselves into the river.”
 
We have the vomiting, blistering, necrosis, hair loss and severe, increasing injury noted to both the victims as well as the trees around the house, on the ninth day. They also reported a peculiar smell.
Like, uh, ozone right after a lightning strike? :rolleyes:
 
My bad, one more note that I missed. Highly ionized air can appear smokey. And again, this indicates the radiation levels were extremely high.
Smoky air has multiple possible causes. E.g. lightning splits nitrogen and oxygen molecules in the air, creating nitrogen oxides (NOx) which further react to produce ground smog.
 
Back
Top