tv message from future

N

nutmichelle

Registered Member
Hi this is a repost of a post a few years back.

Back in the 90's I and 2 other people I know experienced a message from the future during a film I was watching. I was actually full named in mine so I discount it was a advert as has been suggested in previous posts I have read on this. I was not hallucinating unless I was having a shared hallucination with various people spread throughout the UK. My soul purpose of this post is to try and contact others that have experienced it. I have some prudent questions which relate to maybe a team of people that might of been testing this form of time travel message and sending messages to family members has they possibly wasnt around yet to send it to themselves. Like I say, its a theory I have discussed with my nephew who at the age of 18 is developing workable 2d time travel. Please post here as I cannoy post my email address.
 
wookitty.jpg
 
nutmichelle said:
Like I say, its a theory I have discussed with my nephew who at the age of 18 is developing workable 2d time travel.
Click to expand...

Your nephew is developing a work time travel? If he is developing it, how do you know it is workable?
 
Buddha12 said:
So what is that theory you have, why don't you post it?
Click to expand...

Firstly im not a expert in this field and wouldn't have a clue how to post such a thing. I am merely trying to contact those that experienced the same phenomenon to try and make sense of it.

Ok our experience went like this.
I experianced a women saying "we are attempting a test transmission from the yesr 2025" "behind me is the Skinner family" fuzzed out then back "attempting to communicate with Michelle Skinner in a test transmission from the year 2025"

Behind the women who was unnaturally close to the screen was what appeared to be a science fair. There was people trying flying things ect, and the last thing I heard was "I repeat this is a test transmission for Michelle.... and then it fuzzed out and onto the news.

My sister and her husband experienced this aswell. At different locations and approx 3/4 years before they met. It only came to light many years later, when we discovered all of us had experianced the same phenomenon.

Now the result of my sister and her now ex husband was george. He is a high functioning person particularly in maths and science. He has been for a few years now developing his own time travel theories. He was totally unaware of this phenomenon until about 6 months ago. Just so we are clear on the influence factor.

Anyway thats it. Like I said just trying to find others that experianced it to. As far as I can tell no contavt has actually been made in any real way with us all to atleast have a conversation about possible reasons other than were all crazy ;-)
 
Back in the 90's I and 2 other people I know experienced a message from the future during a film I was watching. I was actually full named in mine so I discount it was a advert as has been suggested in previous posts I have read on this. I was not hallucinating unless I was having a shared hallucination with various people spread throughout the UK.
Click to expand...

First you say 2 people, then you say "I was having a shared hallucination with various people spread throughout the UK." How many is that, and why isn't it on the internet?
 
nutmichelle said:
Firstly im not a expert in this field and wouldn't have a clue how to post such a thing. I am merely trying to contact those that experienced the same phenomenon to try and make sense of it.

Ok our experience went like this.
I experianced a women saying "we are attempting a test transmission from the yesr 2025" "behind me is the Skinner family" fuzzed out then back "attempting to communicate with Michelle Skinner in a test transmission from the year 2025"

Behind the women who was unnaturally close to the screen was what appeared to be a science fair. There was people trying flying things ect, and the last thing I heard was "I repeat this is a test transmission for Michelle.... and then it fuzzed out and onto the news.

My sister and her husband experienced this aswell. At different locations and approx 3/4 years before they met. It only came to light many years later, when we discovered all of us had experianced the same phenomenon.

Now the result of my sister and her now ex husband was george. He is a high functioning person particularly in maths and science. He has been for a few years now developing his own time travel theories. He was totally unaware of this phenomenon until about 6 months ago. Just so we are clear on the influence factor.

Anyway thats it. Like I said just trying to find others that experianced it to. As far as I can tell no contavt has actually been made in any real way with us all to atleast have a conversation about possible reasons other than were all crazy ;-)
Click to expand...

Wow man, like, pass the bong...
 
Uncle Pythagoras said:
First you say 2 people, then you say "I was having a shared hallucination with various people spread throughout the UK." How many is that, and why isn't it on the internet?
Click to expand...

Have you never heard of satire! I was being sarcastic......of course I wasnt having a shared hallucination! For goodness sake.

Also I don't feel the need to justify myself to some random person on the Internet who is picking through posts cause hes bored. So you have a good day ok
 
As Horrific as it is I'd suggest you "Wait it out", that might concern you since you'll be in your 50's when the date hits, but what would be really bad is if you've spent an unhealthy amount of time on the subject and then 2025 comes and goes and nothing happens.

(The following will potentially be hard to follow and seen as ludicrous by most, treat it as a good dose of Scifi )

Let me explain a concept in Multiworlds theory, it takes into consideration that the universe in which we exist isn't alone, there is actually infinite "duplicate" universes that exist. I say "duplicate" because originally all universes would be "Identical", this is actually apart of the design to lessen mathematical complexity when attempting to "bridge". As with most "bridge" building, bridges aren't built from just one end or direction, they usually are built by moving from both ends towards placing a keystone. To build a bridge between "Identical" universes, means to understand firstly how to go about building a bridge and secondly understanding that the universes will share the same plan/methodology to be able to coordinate in building a bridge. (This wouldn't be possible if completely entropy was allowed to ensue, it's possible that concepts of such things as "super-symmetry" would fit here.)

Why would we bridge "universes"? Well the simplest reason is in a grander project, that is actually "How this universe was created". In that particular instance the concept is that the universe is "simulated", however the amount of equipment, resources and time required to "make" a universe wouldn't be possible in one universe alone. (a simple reasoning here is that if the small measurement took 10 times the amount of information to replicate into a simulation, it would mean our universe would have to be built in a system 10x greater than the one we are in, it would make it impractical. While it might be possible to "vectorise" a simulation, it would never be as real as our analogue/rasterised one.

So this leads to "Parallel Processing", being able to use the same volume which is "Identical" to the other universes many times over to create an "Infinite" structure only limited by scope. (Inverse square law dictates why we can't see beyond a horizon, yet we can walk to a point and see further beyond.)

One of the side effects (or potentials) of parallel processing this way is the ability to potentially merge results and research paths across many universes, this means in the long run you wouldn't just have universes that are identical but ones that over time would become far greater technologically evolved. In other words "a message from the future" can become "a message from a far more evolved universe, sent on the same day".
 
(Q) said:
Just like we don't feel the need to laugh hysterically at random nutjobs on the internet, but we do, anyway.
Click to expand...

everyone is at different stages of consciousness.
there is a certain stage you reach where your intent is to only speak your truth,
not to convince others of it.
you begin to realize that everyone has their own path.
in other words, you cannot convince a baby they should be walking
when they are at the stage of crawling.
to convince them of that truth, is irrelevant.
 
Stryder said:
As Horrific as it is I'd suggest you "Wait it out", that might concern you since you'll be in your 50's when the date hits, but what would be really bad is if you've spent an unhealthy amount of time on the subject and then 2025 comes and goes and nothing happens.

(The following will potentially be hard to follow and seen as ludicrous by most, treat it as a good dose of Scifi )

Let me explain a concept in Multiworlds theory, it takes into consideration that the universe in which we exist isn't alone, there is actually infinite "duplicate" universes that exist. I say "duplicate" because originally all universes would be "Identical", this is actually apart of the design to lessen mathematical complexity when attempting to "bridge". As with most "bridge" building, bridges aren't built from just one end or direction, they usually are built by moving from both ends towards placing a keystone. To build a bridge between "Identical" universes, means to understand firstly how to go about building a bridge and secondly understanding that the universes will share the same plan/methodology to be able to coordinate in building a bridge. (This wouldn't be possible if completely entropy was allowed to ensue, it's possible that concepts of such things as "super-symmetry" would fit here.)

Why would we bridge "universes"? Well the simplest reason is in a grander project, that is actually "How this universe was created". In that particular instance the concept is that the universe is "simulated", however the amount of equipment, resources and time required to "make" a universe wouldn't be possible in one universe alone. (a simple reasoning here is that if the small measurement took 10 times the amount of information to replicate into a simulation, it would mean our universe would have to be built in a system 10x greater than the one we are in, it would make it impractical. While it might be possible to "vectorise" a simulation, it would never be as real as our analogue/rasterised one.

So this leads to "Parallel Processing", being able to use the same volume which is "Identical" to the other universes many times over to create an "Infinite" structure only limited by scope. (Inverse square law dictates why we can't see beyond a horizon, yet we can walk to a point and see further beyond.)

One of the side effects (or potentials) of parallel processing this way is the ability to potentially merge results and research paths across many universes, this means in the long run you wouldn't just have universes that are identical but ones that over time would become far greater technologically evolved. In other words "a message from the future" can become "a message from a far more evolved universe, sent on the same day".
Click to expand...


And although you seem to know what you are talking about, can I just say that there was a time we thought the world was flat. Our understanding of things especially in quantum physics is changing all the time. So who knows what may be possible in the future. :)
 
What was the film you were watching at the time? I think that's the more important question.

There was an old TV series form the 1970's called "Timeslip" which was centered around the Skinner family.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top