Trump 2.0

How about Judge John Luttig,, is this TDS? From his article in The Atlantic: The End of Rule of Law

"For the almost 250 years since the founding of this nation, America has been the beacon of freedom to the world because of its democracy and rule of law. Our system of checks and balances has been strained before, but democracy—government by the people—and the rule of law have always won the day. Until now, that is. America will never again be that same beacon to the world, because the president of the United States has subverted America’s democracy and corrupted its rule of law."

Know your source.
 
Know your source.
Indeed. GHW Bush nominated Luttig to fill a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and was in serious consideration for the Supreme Court. He has been an very influential conservative legal figure for the past few decades.
 
Know your source.
Luttig was assistant counsel to the president at the White House from 1981 to 1982 under former President Ronald Reagan. From 1982 to 1983, he was a law clerk to then-Judge Antonin Scalia of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. From 1983 to 1985, he served as a law clerk and then special assistant to Chief Justice of the United States Warren E. Burger. He's always been a shining beacon for the rule of law, the Constitution, the Republican party and Conservatism. He knows what he's talking about when it comes to the rule of law far better than us.

If there's anything from his article that is false, please feel free to point it out.
 
Warning to World Leaders: Expect to be Ambushed in White House

So. Here we are again. Trump hosting a world leader in the Oval Office. This time the unfortunate target is South Africa's President Ramaphosa.
Trump, for some reason, maybe at Musk's request, is trying to push the narrative of S.Africa engaging in a genocide against white farmers. Unfortunately there is next to zero evidence for it. So far this year, for example, there have been only 7 people killed on farms, and 4 of those were black.
Then there's the image Trump used to support his lies. A rural road lined with crosses. "These are burial sites right here. Burial sites. Over a thousand of white farmers." What was shown was from a protest in 2020, where the crosses on the side of the road were symbolic, each representing 10 commercial farmers murdered over the years. How many years, I do not know, but not just a few. The crosses are no longer there. They are not burial sites.
Trump then held out an article supposedly showing evidence of the killing of white farmers in S.Africa ... only it was actually about the killing of women in the Dem. Rep. of Congo.

There were other issues with the whole ambush (see Reuters article linked below).

So why is Trump trying to falsify a narrative about genocide of white farmers? I mean, it wouldn't be so as to play to the White Nationalist element of his base, would it? Heaven forbid.



 
Trump is master of the lower-pitch dogwhistle. It's blown on to attract the white nationalists but it's only a concert A (440 Hz) so the rest of us hear it as clearly as an oboe.
 
This is interesting: in an area of New York that voted bigly for Trump in the election (something like +55) just voted in Democrat Sam Sutton in a special election for a New York state Senate seat. And it wasn't even a close call, with Sutton winning c.67-68% of the vote.
That's a bigly swing to the Dems in a Trump hotspot. Imagine this feeding through to the mid-terms! Let's hope the momentum continues!

 
Next in, it seems that Kristi "Dog Killer" Noem has posted on X that the Trump administration has revoked Harvard's ability to enrol international students. There are something like 7,000 international students enrolled currently, which represent something like 1/4 of their student numbers. They've given Harvard 72 hours to comply with Homeland Security's records request, which includes all disciplinary records for non-immigrants enrolled over the past 5 years, and electronic records, videos, or audio of "illegal" and "dangerous or violent" activity by non-immigrant students on campus.


1,339 days to go. :/
 
Warning to World Leaders: Expect to be Ambushed in White House

So. Here we are again. Trump hosting a world leader in the Oval Office. This time the unfortunate target is South Africa's President Ramaphosa.
Trump, for some reason, maybe at Musk's request, is trying to push the narrative of S.Africa engaging in a genocide against white farmers. Unfortunately there is next to zero evidence for it. So far this year, for example, there have been only 7 people killed on farms, and 4 of those were black.
Then there's the image Trump used to support his lies. A rural road lined with crosses. "These are burial sites right here. Burial sites. Over a thousand of white farmers." What was shown was from a protest in 2020, where the crosses on the side of the road were symbolic, each representing 10 commercial farmers murdered over the years. How many years, I do not know, but not just a few. The crosses are no longer there. They are not burial sites.
Trump then held out an article supposedly showing evidence of the killing of white farmers in S.Africa ... only it was actually about the killing of women in the Dem. Rep. of Congo.

There were other issues with the whole ambush (see Reuters article linked below).

So why is Trump trying to falsify a narrative about genocide of white farmers? I mean, it wouldn't be so as to play to the White Nationalist element of his base, would it? Heaven forbid.



Simple. Trump is degrading the meaning of the term “genocide”, to set up a piece of ready-made whataboutery for Israel, which really is conducting genocide against 2 million people in Gaza.
 
Simple. Trump is degrading the meaning of the term “genocide”, to set up a piece of ready-made whataboutery for Israel, which really is conducting genocide against 2 million people in Gaza.
В чём состоит геноцид в Газе? Разве это Израиль первый напал на мирных граждан, и издевался над ними с нечеловеческой звериной жестокостью? Разве "мирные" жители Газы не знали, что в туннелях под их домами прячутся террористы? Разве они всячески не покрывали, и не поддерживали их? Израиль - государство, окружённое врагами со всех сторон, и единственный, кто несёт свет и просвещение в этот регион. Не имея практически никаких природных ресурсов, но имея великолепный человеческий ресурс, они смогли создать сильное, развитое государство всего за несколько десятилетий посреди пустыни, благодаря своей сплочённости, своему уму, и своему трудолюбию. И учитывая все эти факторы, Израиль не может не заслуживать уважения.
 
What is the genocide in Gaza?
What would you call wiping out an entire people from their home? That is Israel's aim. That has been their aim for quite a while.
Was it Israel that first attacked civilians and tortured them with inhuman, animal cruelty?
I'm guessing you don't know the history of the Israel Palestinian conflict? Do you think it began 7 Oct 2023?
Didn't the "peaceful" residents of Gaza know that terrorists were hiding in the tunnels under their homes? Didn't they cover them up and support them in every possible way? Israel is a state surrounded by enemies on all sides, and the only one that brings light and enlightenment to this region. Having virtually no natural resources, but having excellent human resources, they were able to create a strong, developed state in just a few decades in the middle of the desert, thanks to their unity, their intelligence, and their hard work. And given all these factors, Israel cannot but deserve respect..
Does giving them respect for what they've achieved in the past mean that they should be allowed to force a people from their homeland? That they should be given free rein to kill children, the elderly, almost indiscriminately? To bomb hospitals? Something like 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since that terrorist attack. 50,000 Palestinians dead. Of which it is thought that >80% were civilians. More than twice that number have been injured. Over 110,000. Some estimates suggest up to 30% of the casualties have been children. How many Israelis have been killed? Something like 500 since the terrorist attack and nearly all military. Should Israel be given "respect" for this??

How many conflicts are you aware of where the press have not been given access to the front lines? Where the press have not been allowed to see first-hand what has been going on? To be able to record what has been going on? Why do you think that is?

To put those numbers into perspective:
There are c.10m Israelis, and they lost 1,200 people. c.0.012% of their population.
Palestine has a population of c.5.2m, and so far they've lost over 50,000 people. c.1.0% of their population.
Why should we respect what Israel have done here? That's a serious question: why?

I'm in no way supportive of Hamas. Their terrorist attack was despicable. They are a terrorist organisation. But that doesn't mean we have to "respect" the response, that we condone what Israel have done, and continue to do.
 
One for the good news column...


One child asked Leavitt about Trump’s daily candy consumption. She characterized his intake as a “good amount” and added that “he likes pink Starburst and Tootsie Rolls.”

A few questions touched on administration policy, such as the state of the U.S.-Mexico border and what Trump is willing to do about climate change.

But even more questions were about his favorite foods and they led Leavitt to share that Trump also likes to eat a “big, beautiful steak,” ice cream sundaes with chocolate sauce and some toppings, and hamburgers and fries from McDonald’s.
 
I'm in no way supportive of Hamas. Their terrorist attack was despicable. They are a terrorist organisation. But that doesn't mean we have to "respect" the response, that we condone what Israel have done, and continue to do.
Olga could also read this:


I also recommend Arwa Mahdawi's column in The Guardian.

 
But even more questions were about his favorite foods and they led Leavitt to share that Trump also likes to eat a “big, beautiful steak,” ice cream sundaes with chocolate sauce and some toppings, and hamburgers and fries from McDonald’s.
And that's just for lunch! ;)
 
What is the genocide in Gaza? Was it Israel that first attacked civilians and tortured them with inhuman, animal cruelty? Didn't the "peaceful" residents of Gaza know that terrorists were hiding in the tunnels under their homes? Didn't they cover them up and support them in every possible way? Israel is a state surrounded by enemies on all sides, and the only one that brings light and enlightenment to this region. Having virtually no natural resources, but having excellent human resources, they were able to create a strong, developed state in just a few decades in the middle of the desert, thanks to their unity, their intelligence, and their hard work. And given all these factors, Israel cannot but deserve respect.
Middle of the desert.... Oh! Do you mean the land that used to be called Palestine?
 
Does giving them respect for what they've achieved in the past mean that they should be allowed to force a people from their homeland? That they should be given free rein to kill children, the elderly, almost indiscriminately? To bomb hospitals? Something like 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since that terrorist attack. 50,000 Palestinians dead. Of which it is thought that >80% were civilians. More than twice that number have been injured. Over 110,000. Some estimates suggest up to 30% of the casualties have been children. How many Israelis have been killed? Something like 500 since the terrorist attack and nearly all military. Should Israel be given "respect" for this??
Then there's this:
The UN’s humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, told the BBC this morning that 14,000 babies could die in Gaza in 48 hours if aid did not reach them in time [see footnote]. Five aid trucks entered Gaza on Monday but Fletcher described this as a “drop in the ocean” and totally inadequate for the population’s needs.

It followed the director general of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, saying yesterday that 2 million people were starving in the Gaza Strip while “tonnes of food is blocked at the border” by Israel.

So who knows what the actual numbers are?
 
Does giving them respect for what they've achieved in the past mean that they should be allowed to force a people from their homeland? That they should be given free rein to kill children, the elderly, almost indiscriminately? To bomb hospitals? Something like 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since that terrorist attack. 50,000 Palestinians dead. Of which it is thought that >80% were civilians. More than twice that number have been injured. Over 110,000. Some estimates suggest up to 30% of the casualties have been children. How many Israelis have been killed? Something like 500 since the terrorist attack and nearly all military. Should Israel be given "respect" for this??

How many conflicts are you aware of where the press have not been given access to the front lines? Where the press have not been allowed to see first-hand what has been going on? To be able to record what has been going on? Why do you think that is?

To put those numbers into perspective:
There are c.10m Israelis, and they lost 1,200 people. c.0.012% of their population.
Palestine has a population of c.5.2m, and so far they've lost over 50,000 people. c.1.0% of their population.
Why should we respect what Israel have done here? That's a serious question: why?
Wellllll.. from what I can see, you have provided zero evidence which suggests that Israel are doing all of this in anything but a polite manner. So there's that.
 
What would you call wiping out an entire people from their home? That is Israel's aim. That has been their aim for quite a while.

I'm guessing you don't know the history of the Israel Palestinian conflict? Do you think it began 7 Oct 2023?

Does giving them respect for what they've achieved in the past mean that they should be allowed to force a people from their homeland? That they should be given free rein to kill children, the elderly, almost indiscriminately? To bomb hospitals? Something like 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since that terrorist attack. 50,000 Palestinians dead. Of which it is thought that >80% were civilians. More than twice that number have been injured. Over 110,000. Some estimates suggest up to 30% of the casualties have been children. How many Israelis have been killed? Something like 500 since the terrorist attack and nearly all military. Should Israel be given "respect" for this??

How many conflicts are you aware of where the press have not been given access to the front lines? Where the press have not been allowed to see first-hand what has been going on? To be able to record what has been going on? Why do you think that is?

To put those numbers into perspective:
There are c.10m Israelis, and they lost 1,200 people. c.0.012% of their population.
Palestine has a population of c.5.2m, and so far they've lost over 50,000 people. c.1.0% of their population.
Why should we respect what Israel have done here? That's a serious question: why?

I'm in no way supportive of Hamas. Their terrorist attack was despicable. They are a terrorist organisation. But that doesn't mean we have to "respect" the response, that we condone what Israel have done, and continue to do.

What would you call wiping out an entire people from their home? That is Israel's aim. That has been their aim for quite a while.

I'm guessing you don't know the history of the Israel Palestinian conflict? Do you think it began 7 Oct 2023?

Does giving them respect for what they've achieved in the past mean that they should be allowed to force a people from their homeland? That they should be given free rein to kill children, the elderly, almost indiscriminately? To bomb hospitals? Something like 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since that terrorist attack. 50,000 Palestinians dead. Of which it is thought that >80% were civilians. More than twice that number have been injured. Over 110,000. Some estimates suggest up to 30% of the casualties have been children. How many Israelis have been killed? Something like 500 since the terrorist attack and nearly all military. Should Israel be given "respect" for this??

How many conflicts are you aware of where the press have not been given access to the front lines? Where the press have not been allowed to see first-hand what has been going on? To be able to record what has been going on? Why do you think that is?

To put those numbers into perspective:
There are c.10m Israelis, and they lost 1,200 people. c.0.012% of their population.
Palestine has a population of c.5.2m, and so far they've lost over 50,000 people. c.1.0% of their population.
Why should we respect what Israel have done here? That's a serious question: why?

I'm in no way supportive of Hamas. Their terrorist attack was despicable. They are a terrorist organisation. But that doesn't mean we have to "respect" the response, that we condone what Israel have done, and continue to do.
Вот этим и отличаются израильтяне от остальных - тем, что они являются единым народом, одной семьёй. И боль каждого своего соотечественника воспринимают, как свою личную трагедию. Что бы вы сказали, если бы это вашу дочь, вашу мать, вашу сестру, вашу жену захватили в плен, насилывали всем ХАМАСом, издевались, отрезали пальцы, выкалывали глаза, выворачивали руки и ноги, а затем прислали бы вам видео со всеми этими издевательствами? Если бы это ваших стариков родителей убили на пороге собственного дома - вы были бы также добры к этим "нелюдям"? Вы можете считать меня какой угодно: жестокой, циничной, равнодушной - но я бы истребила их всех "до седьмого колена", без всякой жалости и сожаления. Чтобы впредь ни у кого не возникло бы даже мысли повторить что-нибудь подобное. Израильтяне здесь правы, и никто не имеет права их осуждать.
 
This is what distinguishes Israelis from others - that they are one people, one family. And they perceive the pain of each of their compatriots as their own personal tragedy.
It doesn't distinguish them at all. Yes, they suffered an horrendous terrorist attack. That does not give them the right to commit genocide. And that is what they appear to have embarked upon.
What would you say if it was your daughter, your mother, your sister, your wife who was captured, raped by all of Hamas, mocked, had her fingers cut off, her eyes gouged out, her arms and legs twisted, and then they sent you a video of all this mockery? If it were your elderly parents who were killed on the threshold of their own home - would you be just as kind to these "inhumans"?
The Israelis have suffered maybe 2,000 deaths, so that gives them the right to kill maybe 7x that number of children???
What would you say if it was your daughter, your son, who was killed by Israel. What would you do? Innocent children.
What would you say if it was your father, your mother, innocent of anything Hamas have done, that are killed by Israel? And if your partner was killed by Israel, yet innocent of anything Hamas had done? What would you do?
You can think of me as anything you like: cruel, cynical, indifferent - but I would exterminate them all "to the seventh generation", without any pity or regret. So that in the future no one would even have the thought of repeating something like this.
So a terrorist organisation in your country kills some people elsewhere, and you think it okay for that targetted country to retaliate and slaughter, murder, kill, thousands upon thousands of children, and many times that of other people of your country?
I get the outrage they're experiencing, but not the actions they're taking.
The Israelis are right here, and no one has the right to condemn them.
Everyone has the right to condemn them. Ever heard of the expression "two wrongs do not make a right"?
There's no issue with being outraged about what happened to them on 7 Oct 2023. I am. But murdering c.40k+ civilians (thus far), of which c.10k+ are children (thus far), is worthy of condemnation. Don't be mistaken: that is what they are doing. It is murder. Find the Hamas terrorists, deal with them. It doesn't require the slaughter of innocents to do that.

I would suggest that you also read up on the history of that region. Because the actions of Israel, in that context, are not motivated by the act on 7 Oct 2023 but by their history with Palestine. And that day was just an excuse to do what they have long sought. But regardless of motivation, it doesn't make their actions right, moral, ethical, acceptable... unless you are someone who thinks genocide is acceptable?
 
Back
Top