Trump 2.0

Pinball1970 said:
At leas

It's actually a good discussion.
Click to expand...
That's the frustrating thing about RFK: he actually did some solid work as an environmental lawyer--and he did rescue a sea turtle on camera once, which he apparently no longer gives a shit about. And, setting aside the vaccine bs, he had reasonable concerns about UPFs and the like. I don't know about that seed oil thing, but I kinda thought that deep-frying in general ain't all that great; regardless, I'm sticking with olive oil and sunflower oil as my primary cooking oils.

And I don't know what his problem with pommes frites in Belgium is. The ones I've had--a lot actually--were always great. French fries/chips/pommes frites is always a sensitive subject though. There's this show with Sterling K Brown that's set in an underground city, post-apocalypse, and the diner supposedly has the best fries in the freakin world--and they were crinkle cut fries! There is simply no fucking way that crinkle cut fries are anyone's idea of the best fries in the world.
 
Last edited:
parmalee said:
That's the frustrating thing about RFK: he actually did some solid work as an environmental lawyer--and he did rescue a sea turtle on camera once, which he apparently no longer gives a shit about. And, setting aside the vaccine bs, he had reasonable concerns about UPFs and the like. I don't know about that seed oil thing, but I kinda thought that deep-frying in general ain't all that great; regardless, I'm sticking with olive oil and sunflower oil as my primary cooking oils.

And I don't know what his problem with pommes frites in Belgium is. The ones I've had--a lot actually--were always great. French fries/chips/pommes frites is always a sensitive subject though. There's this show with Sterling K Brown that's set in an underground city, post-apocalypse, and the diner supposedly has the best fries in the freakin world--and they were crinkle cut fries! There is simply no fucking way that crinkle cut fries are anyone's idea of the best fries in the world.
Click to expand...
He is an anti vaxer? Just going off the discussion. If he is? All bets off. EDIT and an anti science nut job. Thanks parmalee
His speech has no bearing on anything though.
 
Last edited:
Pinball1970 said:
He is an anti vaxer? Just going off the discussion. If he is all bets off.
His speech has no bearing on anything though.
Click to expand...
RFK is one of the OG anti-vaxxers--and he always lies about it, and claims that he's not. For him, it was originally that whole thimerisol thing causing autism that started it and then he branched out.
 
parmalee said:
RFK is one of the OG anti-vaxxers--and he always lies about it, and claims that he's not. For him, it was originally that whole thimerisol thing causing autism that started it and then he branched out.
Click to expand...
Ok, I don't know these guys. I will look into him.
 
Sarkus said:
This was an article in The Grauniad about the whole seed-oil thing:
www.theguardian.com

Robert F Kennedy Jr claims seed oils are ‘poisoning’ us. Here’s why he’s wrong

Like a host of online influencers, the man likely to be the US’s next health secretary has denounced the vegetable oils used in countless foods. The science is not on their side
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
Even UPFs--ultra processed foods--are somewhat complicated. Many, perhaps most, aren't great; but one really has to consider it on a case by case basis--I don't think it's really all that bad to inject vitamins into corn flakes, but doing so makes them a UPF.
 
Sarkus said:
Shocking news: UK sales of Tesla have actually gone up over the past month. :(
Click to expand...
А в России Теслу вообще никто всерьёз не воспринимает. Над ней только прикалываются в роликах. Не прижилась даже у наших олигархов.
 
Parmalee
You did recommend a bullet in the skull for certain posters here and you quified it with the following..

" that person needs a bullet in their skull--and that is not hyperbole.."
"That probably sounds heavy-handed, or a bit much, to some. To them I say, Seriously? "

And, to make it clear, you were saying that about "certain posters here" too
My bold
parmalee said:
If that question is coming from a presumably semi-intelligent adult (Trump, Musk, the GOP, certain posters here), that person doesn't need a sincere response, i.e., "conversation", that person needs a bullet in their skull--and that is not hyperbole...

...That probably sounds heavy-handed, or a bit much, to some. To them I say, Seriously?
Click to expand...
Well, to go in to parmalee mode...
Put a bullet in all the trump supporters skulls. Simples.
 
Last edited:
foghorn said:
Parmalee
You did recommend a bullet in the skull and you quified it with the following..
"That probably sounds heavy-handed, or a bit much, to some. To them I say, Seriously? "

And, to make it clear, you were saying that about "certain posters here" too
My bold
Click to expand...
Did I dispute that? Nope. Can you read? (Nope, clearly.) The issue is that you are seemingly incapable of distinguishing probability from actuality, and that you seemingly object to this hypothesis: A rape advocate is far more likely to be a rapist than someone who is not a rape advocate. That's seriously creepy.

Also you're spamming the forum with your idiocy.

Again though, I'm sure that rapists will appreciate your valiant defense of them.
 
parmalee said:
Did I dispute that? Nope. Can you read? (Nope, clearly.) The issue is that you are seemingly incapable of distinguishing probability from actuality, and that you seemingly object to this hypothesis: A rape advocate is far more likely to be a rapist than someone who is not a rape advocate. That's seriously creepy.

Also you're spamming the forum with your idiocy.

Again though, I'm sure that rapists will appreciate your valiant defense of them.
Click to expand...
Stop trying to wiggle out of it.
 
billvon said:
When you get to the point where you are actively advocating murder for people who you argue with (and who disagree with you) - you've lost any pretense to rationality.
Click to expand...
That's not what this is about though--See the JK Rowling thread. This guy can't read (and he's spamming the forum).

Also, I think with that one it more suicide than murder--there's a subsequent post with clarification (it was weeks or months ago, I'm not looking it up).
 
foghorn said:
Stop trying to wiggle out of it.
Parmalee mode on: go kill youself. Parmalee mode off
Click to expand...
OH my fucking god. Aren't you the guy who couldn't even figure out how to change the settings on your own freakin computer?

What exactly am I trying to "wiggle out of" here?
 
Sarkus said:
The difference, though, (and whisper this very quietly), is that Teslas are actually quite good cars. Unlike Ratner's jewellery which really was crap. ;)
Click to expand...
They are - apart from the ridiculous Swastitrerk, which seems to be a turkey.

But they are too obese for European city streets, and there is now a good selection of alternatives.
 
Also:
foghorn said:
Stop trying to wiggle out of it.
Click to expand...
This is just weird. Clearly, I stand by what I said--I'm not allowed to say it again, though, because I'll get another infraction.

What I am objecting to is this:

Parmalee said: You (Trek) are a rape supporter; consequently, there is a very strong probability that you are a sexual assailant, as well.

Trek is a rape advocate--this is well established, just read the fucking thread. A rape advocate is far more likely to be a rapist than someone who is not a rape advocate. Do you truly not understand this? Nothing about Trump there, right? And no definitive declarations, right?

Seriously, take your meds. And maybe consider some adult literacy courses.
 
Damn
Sorry folks.
I posted two posts here in this thread by mistake, should have been the Rowlings thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top