Mephura said:Really, you have only listed two options. X or not X.
Number 3 doesn't really exist. If you choose X, you aren't chosing not X, and vise versa. It's an either or senario. In or out. Anything else is just uncertainty.
Your example of 3 would be X, then changing to not X. The motivations aren't the question. The choices are.
Number 4 would also be X, just a piss poor way of acting after making your choice. to go back to song lyrics
"If you chose not to decide you still have made a choice"
If you chose not to pick X, then you are chosing not X.
Simple.
Uh. Rarely are the options we get to choose from simple, non-composite phenomena. For example, "dating Betty" is a composite phenomenon of "dating" and "Betty"; Ben could in fact *date* Betty, but if he chooses option 3, then dating Betty is merely a stepping stone to "dating XY".
It is because our options are composite phenomena, that we always have 4. If the options are non-composite phenomena (which is rare; like being in a sinking boat with two other people, and being able to save only one), then we are indeed facing an either-or, but even then, we can sometimes have the third choice, that of inaction.
But the real question would be what that reason is, now wouldn't it?
Ah, our confident words, what desperate pleas they are.