Of course.
Three did not survive. Another three almost died.
Not the way you employ it.
There are no black holes in the universe at all, there are only spherical celestial bodies, the images of so-called black holes are annular eclipses
- Thread starter Wenbin Zhao
- Start date
- Status
Three did not survive. Another three almost died.
Not the way you employ it.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Wenbin, please to not spam multiple members by PM. It is bad form.
If you want to discuss NASA and the Moon landings, feel free to do so. It is not a banned subject. Start a new thread in the Fringe subforum or Free Thoughts.
Be aware though, just because you can start a discussion about it doesn't mean you will be given free reign. Rules about logic and rational, evidence-based thinking still apply. And if you decide you don't like being challenged, deciding posters are incompetent and not with answering will be considered as a concession.
If you want to discuss NASA and the Moon landings, feel free to do so. It is not a banned subject. Start a new thread in the Fringe subforum or Free Thoughts.
Be aware though, just because you can start a discussion about it doesn't mean you will be given free reign. Rules about logic and rational, evidence-based thinking still apply. And if you decide you don't like being challenged, deciding posters are incompetent and not with answering will be considered as a concession.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
Though we have different viewpoints, I clearly know you are a very good person, thank you for your kind words.
I really fear being banned, I really didn’t tell a single lie in that healthy thread posted by me, and myself and other 15 people were the solid evidence to support my theory, you know it was closed without any evidence against my discovery, my theory, my law, my cure.
Sad!
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
If you are going to get banned you've already crossed that line by now. Moon hoaxes don't even make the Top Five list around here.
Post in the Fringe Forum.
Only make assertions you can back up with objectively verifiable evidence.
Personal opinions, without objectively verifiable evidence are worth nothing and will damage your credibility.
Expect your arguments to be dismantled.
It is not necessary to lie to get people hurt.
It is not necessary to be accused of lying to get a medical advice thread locked.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
I did not tell people to take some medicine which might potentially has some side effect.
Standing can hurt a person who can stand?
Walking can hurt a person who can walk?
Running can hurt a person who can run?
Sitting down can hurt a person who can sit down?
Lying down can hurt a person who can lie down?
If lying down can hurt you who can lie down, you better don’t lie down tonight, OK?
Which teacher taught you such ridiculous logic?
Last edited:
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
I did not say you did.
In post 244 , above, you said you "didn't tell a single lie" in that thread.
But no one has accused you of lying in that thread.
That's not why it was locked.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
But in post 245, you meant my discovery, my theory, my law, my cure might get people hurt.
Right?
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
That is not for you, or me, or the mods to decide. None of us are healthcare professionals.
Most forums draw a very hard line on offering medical advice. It's not personal. It's a legal liability thing.
This is way, way off-topic. I think if this is just going to digress into complaining about your other thread, this thread should be locked.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
A perfect cure must not necessarily be found by a doctor, it can also be found by a patient, let alone by a patient who is a physics genius.
Understand?
Last edited:
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
We have covered that topic, no need to rehash it again. It looks like we are done with Black holes also. This is a shame in a way because multiple posters went to the trouble of citing information regarding black holes and AGNs from Science platforms, popular articles, published papers, journals and even animations for you.
You have not responded to any of that detail at all.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
While NASA is unreliable, (I have told you the why privately,) the Event Horizon Telescopes are very reliable, they showed us two images of those two so-called black holes which were actually annular eclipse phenomena in the universe.
After discussing with all of you so good people for more than 10 days, I have more confidence in my conjecture that those two images were annular eclipse phenomena in the universe.
OK we can continue talk about this topic.
I’m pretty sure time will find my theory is correct.
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
No I'm done. We could present more solid evidence, science/published papers wrt black holes, but this thread has shown you will ignore all that and go back to constipation.
Wenbin Zhao
Registered Senior Member
You ignored the fact that there are too many probabilities that we can
observe annular eclipse phenomena in the universe.
It's a non-issue except with regard direct observation of said phenomenon, of which we only have 2 thus far recorded (both previously referenced in this thread). And, without looking at the specific papers that documented such direct observations, I'm pretty sure that they would have ruled out, with evidence, as to why they weren't just looking at an annual eclipse.
Tell you what: go to the papers that reported the direct observations, go through their report, their workings, and show how they could be explained by an annular eclipse. Then, when you're satisfied that their observations can be explained sufficiently by your theory, send them the details and argument. Better yet, write a paper that documents the theory, and let others peer-review it.
How does that sound?
Wenbin Zhao:
If you must discuss moon landing conspiracies, try starting a thread in the public forums. In the meantime, I have replied to the private message you sent to me about this, even though I at no time mentioned it or asked you about the topic.
Again, Wenbin Zhao, you have posted a bunch of claims but you haven't posted any evidence that tends to show that your conjectures are the truth.
Next time you start a thread making controversial claims, or disputing accepted science, make sure you bring the evidence and arguments to support your claims. Nobody is going to merely take your word for it that you're right and all the world's scientists are wrong. You'll need to do better than that.
Also, stop trying to reopen discussion of your unproved "cure" for constipation. Until you have evidence that it works, there is nothing to discuss. You've been told what you need to do. You say it's easy to get the evidence. So go away, do the controlled studies and come back to us when you have the evidence.
This thread is now closed.
It seems you have been sending unevidenced claims to members of sciforums by private messaging. Stop that. Nobody wants to be spammed with ideas you can't support or prove.
If you must discuss moon landing conspiracies, try starting a thread in the public forums. In the meantime, I have replied to the private message you sent to me about this, even though I at no time mentioned it or asked you about the topic.
No. They showed us images of two black holes.
You haven't been able to say what gave you any confidence at all in your conjecture.
Actually, I think we're done.
Again, Wenbin Zhao, you have posted a bunch of claims but you haven't posted any evidence that tends to show that your conjectures are the truth.
Next time you start a thread making controversial claims, or disputing accepted science, make sure you bring the evidence and arguments to support your claims. Nobody is going to merely take your word for it that you're right and all the world's scientists are wrong. You'll need to do better than that.
Also, stop trying to reopen discussion of your unproved "cure" for constipation. Until you have evidence that it works, there is nothing to discuss. You've been told what you need to do. You say it's easy to get the evidence. So go away, do the controlled studies and come back to us when you have the evidence.
This thread is now closed.
- Status