There are no black holes in the universe at all, there are only spherical celestial bodies, the images of so-called black holes are annular eclipses

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pinball1970 said:
Either way it's a win win. He uploads his anus, report, block and perma ban.
He uploads ground breaking physics, Noble prize and during his acceptance speech..

"I just want to mention that not everyone accepted my theories at first, most derided me but there was one hope, one voice in the wilderness that taught me how to upload a standard, compressed jpg from an iPhone to a science platform. That one voice was Pinball1970, thank you."
(Everyone applauds while I chat up two beautiful Stockholm ladies oblivious, I realise it's me they are all looking at and clapping towards, I stand, nod in their direction, adjust my bow then sit blushing slightly)
Click to expand...
….end then you wake up….
 
New findings:

"...the black hole at the center of the Milky Way is spinning almost at top speed. Its rotation axis points to Earth. In addition, the emission near the black hole is mainly caused by extremely hot electrons in the surrounding accretion disk and not by a so-called jet...."

phys.org

Self-learning neural network cracks iconic black holes

A team of astronomers led by Michael Janssen (Radboud University, The Netherlands) has trained a neural network with millions of synthetic black hole data sets. Based on the network and data from the Event Horizon Telescope, they now predict, among other things, that the black hole at the center...
phys.org
 
I’m trying to figure out a way to to let people be able to read my entire paper about black holes.

When COVID-19 ravaged, I also thought stopping COVID-19 from spreading is a matter of physics, I wrote a lot of papers about how to block the tiny objects of COVID-19 from moving based on my physics, I posted those papers at:

wenbinzhao65.medium.com

Wenbin Zhao – Medium

Read writing from Wenbin Zhao on Medium.
wenbinzhao65.medium.com wenbinzhao65.medium.com

Now, I want to go to that blog platform to post my paper on black holes first, but I can’t go there now, you all know I’m in China, I can’t say too much…..

Can anyone recommend other blog platforms to me?
I will try, and I will also post how I calculated the probability of annular eclipse phenomena in the universe when I saw the image of that so-called black hole in the M87 galaxy in 2019.

Anyway, I’m pretty sure that a physics genius will be able to figure out a way to let all of you read his papers.:)
 
Last edited:
billvon said:
Hmm. And you can't figure out a way to let everyone read your papers.

What conclusion can you draw from this?
Click to expand...
Sorry, my English is not good, I expressed that wrong, and thank you for your reminding. It should be:

Anyway, I’m pretty sure that a physics genius will be able to figure out a way to let those who are interested in his ideas be able to read his paper.
 
Wenbin Zhao said:
Anyway, I’m pretty sure that a physics genius will be able to figure out a way to let those who are interested in his ideas be able to read his paper.
Click to expand...
Here's a really good way:
1. Join a science forum, where you can discuss your work.
2. Be knowledgeable about the area of interest.
3. Don't say ignorant things that cause people to quickly recognize that you know nothing.

Here's a really bad way:
1. Declare yourself a genius as often as possible.
2. Yell everything in giant bold font. Ignore every request that you stop doing that.
3. Be sure to tell people that you don't care one wit about irritating them.
4. Talk about stuff you know nothing about.
5. Instead of asking questions, be sure to only make unfounded assertions with no evidence.
7. Repeat your unfounded assertions over and over and over.
6. Tell anyone you encounter that you think they're incompetent.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Here's a really good way:
1. Join a science forum, where you can discuss your work.
2. Be knowledgeable about the area of interest.
3. Don't say ignorant things that cause people to quickly recognize that you know nothing.

Here's a really bad way:
1. Declare yourself a genius as often as possible.
2. Yell everything in giant bold font. Ignore every request that you stop doing that.
3. Be sure to tell people that you don't care one wit about irritating them.
4. Talk about stuff you know nothing about.
5. Instead of asking questions, be sure to only make unfounded assertions with no evidence.
7. Repeat your unfounded assertions over and over and over.
6. Tell anyone you encounter that you think they're incompetent.
Click to expand...
DaveC426913 said:
Here's a really good way:
1. Join a science forum, where you can discuss your work.
2. Be knowledgeable about the area of interest.
3. Don't say ignorant things that cause people to quickly recognize that you know nothing.

Here's a really bad way:
1. Declare yourself a genius as often as possible.
2. Yell everything in giant bold font. Ignore every request that you stop doing that.
3. Be sure to tell people that you don't care one wit about irritating them.
4. Talk about stuff you know nothing about.
5. Instead of asking questions, be sure to only make unfounded assertions with no evidence.
7. Repeat your unfounded assertions over and over and over.
6. Tell anyone you encounter that you think they're incompetent.
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for your kind reminding specifically written for me, Wenbin Zhao. Thank you.

Let’s end the arguing about whether or not Wenbin Zhao knows something, I’m pretty sure you have got a conclusion after over a week of arguing.

Now let’s talk about something that matters, I said, I’m not an amateur astronomer let alone an astronomer, you are good at astronomy, I want to talk about Astronomy in physics ways.

We know the density of water is 1g/cubic centimeter，gold about 20g/cubic centimeter.

Does anybody know the average density of the universe? How many kilograms per cubic light year?

Or does anybody know the average density of the part of the universe which we have known? How many kilograms per cubic light year? Or how many celestial bodies per cubic billion light year?
 
Last edited:
I applied for the right to posting articles at a blog platform in China this morning, I just received a notice saying my application was not approved.
 
OK, I posted my original paper about black holes on a Chinese blog platform at


I don’t know if you will be able to go to it.

I will draw a sketch again, and repeat the calculation of the probability of annular eclipse in the universe which I did in 2019 when I saw the image of that so-called black hole in the M 87 galaxy, and post them on the blog platform.
 
Wenbin Zhao said:
Thank you very much for your kind reminding specifically written for me, Wenbin Zhao. Thank you.

Let’s end the arguing about whether or not Wenbin Zhao knows something, I’m pretty sure you have got a conclusion after over a week of arguing.

Now let’s talk about something that matters, I said, I’m not an amateur astronomer let alone an astronomer, you are good at astronomy, I want to talk about Astronomy in physics ways.

We know the density of water is 1g/cubic centimeter，gold about 20g/cubic centimeter.

Does anybody know the average density of the universe? How many kilograms per cubic light year?

Or does anybody know the average density of the part of the universe which we have known? How many kilograms per cubic light year? Or how many celestial bodies per cubic billion light year?
Click to expand...
This article https://www.space.com/universe-total-amount-matter-measured says it is equivalent to 6 hydrogen atoms per cubic metre. I would need some time with a pencil and paper to convert that into kg per cubic light year, but perhaps you can do the conversion yourself.
 
Lets see.
There are 10^15 metres in a light year.
That's 10^45 cubic metres in a cubic light year.

A hydrogen atom masses about 10^-27kg. Six is closer to 10^-26.

10^-26 × 10^45 is the same as subtracting 26 from 45, and we get 10^19kg.


Thats about the same as Saturn's Moon, Mimas. It's 400km in diameter.

An otherwise empty cubic light year of space masses about as much as a moon 400km in diameter.
 
Last edited:
Wenbin Zhao said:
OK, I posted my original paper about black holes on a Chinese blog platform at


I don’t know if you will be able to go to it.

I will draw a sketch again, and repeat the calculation of the probability of annular eclipse in the universe which I did in 2019 when I saw the image of that so-called black hole in the M 87 galaxy, and post them on the blog platform.
Click to expand...
I was able to read it so the rest of you don't have to.

It is nothing more than what he has been saying here.

As expected, There are no calculations in it, there is no evidence to support it. There are a lot of "I think..." and "so many stars, two of them must line up" nonsense.

The diagram he was so eager to share with us is his idea of a black hole seen from the side:

1000007681.jpg

LOOK AT IT Pinball1970 - JUST LOOK AT IT. THIS IS ON YOU.
 
Last edited:
It looks like everyone thinks I drew the three-view drawing of a so-called black hole wrong, OK.

Can anybody draw a correct one of it for us?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top