# Theory of Everything.

Vanishly unlikely is not a total exclusion,
Likewise, it is vanishingly unlikely - though not a total exclusion - that a million monkeys randomly bashing at a million typewriters will type out The Complete Works of William Shakespeare.

Come on. If you want people to read something you wrote, at least bone up on your preferred subject.

You Brits are always full of new surprises.
Allegedly comes from oop North, lad.

And yet still, not thinking, considering, what might be behind the direct observable world. The article tries to prove the following thesis:

In this article a particle is being presented that explains all known forces of nature. The particle has no dimensions, it is a dimensional basic particle. Hence it gets the following name: 'dimensional basic' (db) particle. The core of this discovery is that the separate fundamental forces of nature: - the strong interaction, the electromagnetic interaction, the weak interaction and the gravitational interaction - are calculatable with one formula out of one principle. The statistical math of the quantum theory is set aside in favor of a goniometric approach. Gravitation is the only force that matters and the strong force, the electromagnetic force and the weak force can be explained out of gravitation while gravity itself is only caused by the curvature of db's. The formula for the extent of curvature around a db is: sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2) × Kr = 1. In the formula: x, y, z, are coordinates in spacetime [m], Kr = curvature [m^-1].

And for it to make any sense one has to read the article... or as demonstrated by the former two posters... not.

The particle has no dimensions, it is a dimensional basic particle.

...gravity itself is only caused by the curvature of db's.

A zero-dimensional particle has curvature?

It's a rhetorical question; I'm not going to read and interpret the article. That's your job.

A zero-dimensional particle has curvature?

It's a rhetorical question; I'm not going to read and interpret the article. That's your job.
Repeat modus: And for it to make any sense one has to read the article... or as demonstrated by the former two posters... not.