Theory of Everything

sscully said:
So, if the world agrees with me one day, will you listen to my religious "agenda"? You do realize you put that "psst" IN the ToE thread, as if he is unaware....
Click to expand...

The world will not agree with you, because science relies on evidence. You have unsupported claims, silly hypothesis, belief in silly invisible pixies in the sky, and your agenda.
When an observable ToE is validated, and I believe it will eventually, it will be from some mainstream physicist/cosmologist with access to the many state of the art probes available.
It will not originate from someone who comes to a science forum, sprouting nonsense, in the hope of fooling a few individuals for his own personal satisfaction.
 
sscully said:
And I was referring you to my proof. I am not rewriting my evidence, read posts 1, 74, 78, 79. Name calling is definitely a sign of a mature mind.
Click to expand...

The thing is, you haven't provided any real proof.
 
Not very much of what goes on in the interior of stars is evidenced by visible light exiting their photospheres (which is what we observe as red- or blue- Doppler shifted). Neutrinos are however a different story.

Other than that, go for it!
 
sscully said:
There is no motion towards the Great Attractor; the Milky Way is in ORBIT about the GA, just like the sun is in orbit about the black hole at the center of the Milky Way, in the system I am describing. The "redshift in all distant redshifted galaxies" is a much more complex understanding that requires you to first see that gravity is causing observations in the first place. Thats why I start with the CMB Dipole and the other "Local" galaxy groups I refer to. Ultimately, photons can travel THROUGH the Great Attractor because it is so dense (galaxies = atoms) so it can go THROUGH, come out the other side, be lensed back inward, go through again, and repeat this in a Figure-8 pattern which precisely IS THE SAME as an electromagnetic field. This is how electromagnetic fields operate; particles that are sufficiently small pass THROUGH the mass without being absorbed because the space between the larger masses is so large that the probability of absorption decreases as the particle is relatively smaller and smaller. This Figure-8 pattern has two portions of motion, radially and orbitally. The radial motion has an overall blueshift/redshift that is approximately zero because the inward blueshift is canceled by the subsequent outward redshift. However, the orbital motion redshifts EVERY TIME and there is never any cancellation of this redshift effect. This is why we see all distant redshifted galaxies, we are seeing light that has been trapped in a Figure-8 pattern with the GA for many many cycles through such that the orbital redshift portions add up to larger and larger values. This is also why the GA is far closer (~150 million lightyears?) than the distances we observe (12+ billion lightyears), because the light is stuck in this Figure-8 pattern.
Click to expand...
I'm not on board with you on the figure-8 pattern of photon energy through and around the great attractor, because the explanation for the motion of our galaxy relative to the distribution of structure in the universe doesn't seem to be helped by that concept. Also, the nature of the CMBR, i.e. it is essentially homogeneous and isotropic in its rest frame with slight directional anisotropy, makes sense to me as coming into our arena as the Big Bang arena expands into preexisting surrounding space. I see the CMB as existing in the surrounding space and continually inflowing form outside, from all directions, as our galactic formations separate into that preexisting space. Therefore, the source of the CMB in my hobby-model is the CMB from the parent arenas, and more generally, it is the nature of the background of the greater universe, with local anisotropy applied by local big bang arena action across the landscape of the greater multiple big bang universe.
You have to first see that the Big Bang's assumption of redshift being caused by expansion of space i.e. doppler shift is wrong, otherwise your model will inherit this same critical mistake.
Click to expand...
Fortunately, my model agrees with yours in that I do not invoke space being added between separating galaxies. Infinite space, in my model, has always existed. The motion of galactic structure that we observe, as evidenced by the redshift, is actual physical separation momentum. The momentum within our arena is originally imparted to particles as they form during the period of rapid expansion of the hot dense ball of wave energy that emerges from the Big Bang. Clumping occurs in close quarters where gravity is at its strongest, and is able to overcome the expansion momentum. That allows stars and galaxies to eventually from, but the initial arena specific separation momentum imparted to all particles as they formed is conserved, and as a result, the mature galaxies and galaxy groups are generally moving away from each other.
 
quantum_wave said:
I'm not on board with you on the figure-8 pattern of photon energy through and around the great attractor, because the explanation for the motion of our galaxy relative to the distribution of structure in the universe doesn't seem to be helped by that concept. Also, the nature of the CMBR, i.e. it is essentially homogeneous and isotropic in its rest frame with slight directional anisotropy, makes sense to me as coming into our arena as the Big Bang arena expands into preexisting surrounding space. I see the CMB as existing in the surrounding space and continually inflowing form outside, from all directions, as our galactic formations separate into that preexisting space. Therefore, the source of the CMB in my hobby-model is the CMB from the parent arenas, and more generally, it is the nature of the background of the greater universe, with local anisotropy applied by local big bang arena action across the landscape of the greater multiple big bang universe.
Click to expand...

Don't think too much on the Figure-8, it is far down the line of understanding, I just mentioned it in case it resonated. The CMB is the galactic halo around our galaxy of galaxies, whose center of mass it the Great Attractor. This would provide a uniform gas cloud, which would provide the observation of the CMB. I refer back to posts 74, 78, 79 to see how that is so.

Fortunately, my model agrees with yours in that I do not invoke space being added between separating galaxies. Infinite space, in my model, has always existed. The motion of galactic structure that we observe, as evidenced by the redshift, is actual physical separation momentum. The momentum within our arena is originally imparted to particles as they form during the period of rapid expansion of the hot dense ball of wave energy that emerges from the Big Bang. Clumping occurs in close quarters where gravity is at its strongest, and is able to overcome the expansion momentum. That allows stars and galaxies to eventually from, but the initial arena specific separation momentum imparted to all particles as they formed is conserved, and as a result, the mature galaxies and galaxy groups are generally moving away from each other.
Click to expand...

How do you avoid breaking the laws of physics (going faster than the speed of light) if not by expansion of space or a different interpretation of the cosmological redshift (gravitational redshift)?
 
sscully said:
Care to elaborate?
Click to expand...

The burden of proof is on you my friend. please show me what you have proven. I dont mean philosophically proven, but scientifically. I am looking for examples with detailed explanations, and the math to go with it.
 
zgmc said:
The burden of proof is on you my friend. please show me what you have proven. I dont mean philosophically proven, but scientifically. I am looking for examples with detailed explanations, and the math to go with it.
Click to expand...

cascadinguniverse.org, all the evidence is in my paper there, but please follow the direction of the website. G'luck.
 
Last edited:
sscully said:
I pointed you to the evidence (scientific proof). The burden of disproof is on you. How is it not evidence? Otherwise, you are just disagreeing due to preconceptions, which means absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...

No you have not. For instance you show a picture of the magnetic field of earth, which is only evidence of the magnetic field of the earth. You then make up some hair brained convoluted absurd notion about invisible particles following magnetic lines that make gravity or some such tripe. That is not evidence! It is made up garbage that is not logical or even rational.
 
sscully said:
Give me a few days, I have decided to publish online, throw convention to the curb. You can directly read the entire paper, if you want your full proof inclusive of math, and to read my words that I have picked through hundreds of times opposed to the words of a few quickly written forum posts that are not nearly as thorough and lack supportive references beyond the main few I pointed to.
Click to expand...

Delusions of grandure.
 
sscully said:
Don't think too much on the Figure-8, it is far down the line of understanding, I just mentioned it in case it resonated. The CMB is the galactic halo around our galaxy of galaxies, whose center of mass it the Great Attractor. This would provide a uniform gas cloud, which would provide the observation of the CMB. I refer back to posts 74, 78, 79 to see how that is so.
Click to expand...
It has some resonance, lol, ... if I put on my thinking cap and put myself into it, to the extent that I grasp your model. You are saying that the source of the CMB is the light emitting halo that is perhaps some plasma source that naturally resides around the "galaxy of galaxies". It is always out there surrounding the greater galactic structures, and that explains why it is coming from all directions at all places within the galaxy of galaxies. Is that close to what you are saying?

It seems to require a finite, static universe with the light (CMB) circulating in a spherical version of a figure eight, in, through the lensing, and back out to the halo, where it is absorbed and reemitted for another figure eight journey.

If you wouldn't mind, can you mention the very basic stages of evolution of your model of the universe that brings us here, with the galaxy of galaxies and the halo; what were the preconditions, sources of energy/matter, etc., how has it unfolded over time, and how much time has it taken to get us where we are if you have an estimate. I don't remember how you answered me about if there was a beginning and what was the First Cause.
How do you avoid breaking the laws of physics (going faster than the speed of light) if not by expansion of space or a different interpretation of the cosmological redshift (gravitational redshift)?
Click to expand...
No laws are broken, lol. There is an explanation for how my model obeys the laws, and there are some speculations upon speculations that probably only I would think make sense. If that was more of an idle challenge than an invitation for me to fill your interesting thread with word salad unrelated to your model, I'll spare you, and your thread, any exposure to my personal ramblings on conservation of energy and momentum, and how it all happens without violating faster than light action.

Being me though, I will add that my model is based on gravitational wave energy density, and the speed of light and gravity in any local frame is governed by the energy density in that frame. Obviously, in the earliest stages of our arena's expansion, gravitational wave energy density was at its extreme, and so the speed of light and gravity was slow relative to its speed in the arena as it stands today.
 
quantum_wave said:
It has some resonance, lol, ... if I put on my thinking cap and put myself into it, to the extent that I grasp your model. You are saying that the source of the CMB is the light emitting halo that is perhaps some plasma source that naturally resides around the "galaxy of galaxies". It is always out there surrounding the greater galactic structures, and that explains why it is coming from all directions at all places within the galaxy of galaxies. Is that close to what you are saying?

It seems to require a finite, static universe with the light (CMB) circulating in a spherical version of a figure eight, in, through the lensing, and back out to the halo, where it is absorbed and reemitted for another figure eight journey.

If you wouldn't mind, can you mention the very basic stages of evolution of your model of the universe that brings us here, with the galaxy of galaxies and the halo; what were the preconditions, sources of energy/matter, etc., how has it unfolded over time, and how much time has it taken to get us where we are if you have an estimate. I don't remember how you answered me about if there was a beginning and what was the First Cause.

No laws are broken, lol. There is an explanation for how my model obeys the laws, and there are some speculations upon speculations that probably only I would think make sense. If that was more of an idle challenge than an invitation for me to fill your interesting thread with word salad unrelated to your model, I'll spare you, and your thread, any exposure to my personal ramblings on conservation of energy and momentum, and how it all happens without violating faster than light action.

Being me though, I will add that my model is based on gravitational wave energy density, and the speed of light and gravity in any local frame is governed by the energy density in that frame. Obviously, in the earliest stages of our arena's expansion, gravitational wave energy density was at its extreme, and so the speed of light and gravity was slow relative to its speed in the arena as it stands today.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is a finite, static universe in that it is but one great attractor system, which is like an atom in our observable universe. The CMB is literally caused by the galactic halo of the Great Attractor, which is just the next level "up" from the Milky Way but comprises the same structure as any other galaxy would (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_halo). The universe is infinite, we pretend we can see far because we have telescopes but 14 billion lightyears is 0.00000...0% of infinity. It is quite literally zero percent, not some value slightly greater than. We just can see within our Great Attractor galaxy of galaxies. www.cascadinguniverse.org I posted my full paper on there, I recommend just reading through that website, hopefully it makes more sense when I walk you through it in the paper.
 
Ok, I'll read it through. I noticed you allow email communications. Is that the preferred way of discussing it with you, or will you have a comments section there?
 
I read through some of your paper, and i plan to read more of it later. It can seem to make sense, but I think you are missing some key points. Remember that the easiest person to fool is yourself.

I am hoping some of you also make an attempt to read it. scully has been nothing but polite here, and he deserves some constructive criticism for a change. Someone that is on a quest to figure out how the universe works should be open to listening to reasons why their hypothesis might be flawed.
 
zgmc said:
I read through some of your paper. It can seem to make sense, but I think you are missing some key points. Remember that the easiest person to fool is yourself.
Click to expand...

Could you finish the paper and/or be explicit? And remember the same ;)
 
sscully said:
Could you finish the paper and/or be explicit? And remember the same ;)
Click to expand...

It's you that needs to remember to stop fooling yourself...It's your hypothesis...It's your claims, no one else's
Every Mother sees her own toddler child as the cutest and best in the bunch.
But mixing unsupported claims, unevidenced Ideas that are more easily explained by incumbent models, mythical religious dogma, with the odd fact or two to give it an air of legitimacy, will not hold water.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top