The Truth: The Mathematical Proof Of God, The Holy Trinity.

[kingiyk]

No, it's because they get some psychological satisfaction from kicking cranks, religious or otherwise. It's like a fox hunt. Maybe the fox thinks that the hounds and horses and humans are chasing them "because deep in their hearts they know he is on to something", but in reality it is simply because they thoroughly enjoy ripping helpless animals to shreds.

But please understand: given that you have shown yourself to be a religious crank, you are now their sport.

Enjoy it while you last.

I noticed how you cleverly ignored the other segment from which you quoted from.

 

[kingiyk]

you

kingiyk:

Are you asking why 3+3+3=9 now?

Better start with why 1+1=2 and work your way up to the complex maths from there.


Why are there three Trinities?


What does 3 represent then?

Does 3 represent 1?

Does 7 represent 12? Does 13 represent 347?

Why does 3 represent God?

Why is 9 the Trinity? I thought 3 was the Trinity.

You're getting yourself all muddled.

You know, the irony is that I showed you what an actual proof looks like in this thread.

Yet here you are, pretending that your silly numerical word games are a proof.

You have a lot to learn. Welcome to the wonderful world of numbers and maths!

I just showed you why a bunch of your stuff is not a coincidence, but instead is just a property of numbers.

you should take the time to skim though the proof and you wouldn't need answers to all the questions you ask any more.

 

[Sarkus]

I noticed how you cleverly ignored the other segment from which you quoted from.

I covered it with "given that you have shown yourself to be a religious crank...."
Even if you prefer that I also join the hunt, blow my hunting horn, and shout "Tally ho!", you're just not that interesting.

 

[DaveC426913]

you should take the time to skim though the proof and you wouldn't need answers to all the questions you ask any more.

Another non-answer.

OP is showing their cult mentality, but more relevantly, their lack of interest in engagement.

 

[(Q)]

People keep responding because deep in their hearts they know I am onto something.

Mushrooms, lsd, meth...? Whatever you're on, it's rotting your mind. You see, if I said religion was rotting your mind, Tiassa would be all over it.

This is more than enough to rattle the most stable mind.

Ahhh, isn't that adorable, like a small child proudly showing his parents how he pooped in the toilet.

 

[DaveC426913]

I noticed how you cleverly ignored the other segment from which you quoted from.

You have been ignoring almost everything put to you.
Since you recognize the ploy in others, that means you are doing it knowingly.

Ask yourself this: Why can't you bring yourself to defend challenges to your idea? Is it perhaps because it's falling apart at a touch?

 

[billvon]

People keep responding because deep in their hearts they know I am onto something.

People keep responding because it's fun to see what kind of woo you will post next. It's the same reason it's sometimes fun to engage with a flat Earther - you hear some gems that can be really funny. I recall one flat Earther explain that ships go out of sight on the ocean because of "water mountains" which was a fun/silly concept to contemplate. He really thought there were tall mountains of water moving around on the ocean and that sometimes ships had to "climb" them, which is why all ships don't move at the same speed.

 

[kingiyk]

You have been ignoring almost everything put to you.
Since you recognize the ploy in others, that means you are doing it knowingly.

Ask yourself this: Why can't you bring yourself to defend challenges to your idea? Is it perhaps because it's falling apart at a touch?

I have provided clarity on every single objection thrown my way. They simply were not accepted.
And if unsatisfied, make a compilation of all objections and I shall provide more clarity.

However, It would be nice to focus our time and energy on The Truth. The objective of a debate or forum discussion as this one is not to be right or wrong, but to seek The Truth. And to do that, we must set our pride aside and put all our cards on the table. Which means, when you notice an idea or coincidence that marvels you, it is okay to point it out. So let us revisit the most profound argument again, else it get swallowed up by tangents and lose the clarity it deserves.

A summary of The Proof

Definition of key concepts:

Trinity: A single God existing as three identical entities.
Trinity of Numbers: A single number existing as three identical entities.(e.g. 111,222,333)

A God revealed himself to be The Beginning and The End - (Revelation 22:13).
The same God revealed himself to be One(1) and a Trinity(333) - (1 John 5:7)

I employed the trinity of numbers to show that God to be the One True God (OTG) -
1 2345678 9(333)
God is The beginning(1) and He is The End 9(3 3 3), Trinity.

Furthermore, By fixing the cross into a time clock(which is justified by Romans 5:6) it was revealed how

The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit = 9;

And

God = 3;

9 represents the three members of the trinity and 3 represents God (See Proof for full illustrations.)

It means there are three individuals who are God in 9 (3 3 3)-The Holy Trinity: God, The Father, God, The Son, God, The Holy Spirit all united as one.
It is to be noted that The Holy Trinity (3 3 3) was derived from The Trinity of Numbers (see proof for full illustration).

It is easy to make snide remarks. But if pondered upon, all would leave this topic a much wiser fellow.

 

[billvon]

I have provided clarity on every single objection thrown my way. They simply were not accepted.
And if unsatisfied, make a compilation of all objections and I shall provide more clarity.

OK. You showed birds and whales as examples of "3." None of them are examples of "3."

How do you explain that discrepancy?

 

[(Q)]

I have provided clarity on every single objection thrown my way. They simply were not accepted.
And if unsatisfied, make a compilation of all objections and I shall provide more clarity.

However, It would be nice to focus our time and energy on The Truth. The objective of a debate or forum discussion as this one is not to be right or wrong, but to seek The Truth. And to do that, we must set our pride aside and put all our cards on the table. Which means, when you notice an idea or coincidence that marvels you, it is okay to point it out. So let us revisit the most profound argument again, else it get swallowed up by tangents and lose the clarity it deserves.

A summary of The Proof

Definition of key concepts:

Trinity: A single God existing as three identical entities.
Trinity of Numbers: A single number existing as three identical entities.(e.g. 111,222,333)

A God revealed himself to be The Beginning and The End - (Revelation 22:13).
The same God revealed himself to be One(1) and a Trinity(333) - (1 John 5:7)

I employed the trinity of numbers to show that God to be the One True God (OTG) -
1 2345678 9(333)
God is The beginning(1) and He is The End 9(3 3 3), Trinity.

Furthermore, By fixing the cross into a time clock(which is justified by Romans 5:6) it was revealed how

The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit = 9;

And

God = 3;

9 represents the three members of the trinity and 3 represents God (See Proof for full illustrations.)

It means there are three individuals who are God in 9 (3 3 3)-The Holy Trinity: God, The Father, God, The Son, God, The Holy Spirit all united as one.
It is to be noted that The Holy Trinity (3 3 3) was derived from The Trinity of Numbers (see proof for full illustration).

It is easy to make snide remarks. But if pondered upon, all would leave this topic a much wiser fellow.

You just keep repeating the same nonsense over and over as if your nonsense will suddenly become valid. It won't, it's still just gibberish.

 

[HonestJoe]

I have provided clarity on every single objection thrown my way. They simply were not accepted.

No you haven't. I've twice told you that even if the mathematical connections listed were accurate, they could only prove an internal consistency to your beliefs, not that they are necessarily true. You either ignored or evaded that point.

 

[DaveC426913]

I have provided clarity on every single objection thrown my way.

This is false.

How many points on a cross?
If you laid a cross on a clock, how many of the numerals would the cross point to?
How many planets are there?
Who decides which one is first and which one is last?
Why count them by distance? Why not by size? Or importance?
When did humans develop base 10 counting?
When did humans develop the 12-hour clock?
Who cares if Romans laid a cross on a clock? They're just humans too, right? Are they better men because they're 2000 years dead?
When did the alphabet acquire 27 letters?
When did it stop having 27?
Who gets to decide how many letters the alphabet "officially" has?
When did modern English become the language of the cosmos?
etc. etc.

They simply were not accepted.

The onus is on you prove your claims. You have not done so. They remain unsupported assertions.
Worse, they are premised on falsehoods (see some examples, above).

Since you have bene presented with the above questions several times, and continue to ignore them, it can be deduced that you know your claims about them are wrong. Which means you are knowingly promulgating falsehoods. You are lying to us.

And if unsatisfied, make a compilation of all objections and I shall provide more clarity.

This has been done. If you squandered your time not bothering to answer them, why should be do our homework? The work is yours to do.

However, It would be nice to focus our time and energy on The Truth.

We are. You are not.

The objective of a debate or forum discussion as this one is not to be right or wrong, but to seek The Truth.

We are. You are not.

And to do that, we must set our pride aside

Indeed. The only one with pride here is you. Are you going to set it aside?

Which means, when you notice an idea or coincidence that marvels you, it is okay to point it out.

Sure. I have seen one but the very basic properties of arithmetic. We all learned how numbers work in grade school.

So let us revisit the most profound argument again, else it get swallowed up by tangents and lose the clarity it deserves.

A summary of The Proof

Definition of key concepts:

Trinity: A single God existing as three identical entities.
Trinity of Numbers: A single number existing as three identical entities.(e.g. 111,222,333)

These are simply your premises that you have yet show show are true.

A God revealed himself to be The Beginning and The End - (Revelation 22:13).

Quote without meaning.

The same God revealed himself to be One(1) and a Trinity(333) - (1 John 5:7)

Is that so? Can you quote the Bible where it says "One(1)" and "Trinity(333)"?
Or did you make that up?

I employed the trinity of numbers to show that God to be the One True God (OTG) -
1 2345678 9(333)

This is meaningless. As meaningless as the first time you posted it.

God is The beginning(1) and He is The End 9(3 3 3), Trinity.

Can you quote in the Bible where it says "beginning(1)" and "The End 9(3 3 3)"?
Or did you make that up too?

Furthermore, By fixing the cross into a time clock(which is justified by Romans 5:6) it was revealed how

The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit = 9;

It does no such thing.

And

God = 3;

Another unsupported claim - just attaching numbers to words.

9 represents the three members of the trinity and 3 represents God (See Proof for full illustrations.)

You made this up.

It means there are three individuals who are God in 9 (3 3 3)-The Holy Trinity: God, The Father, God, The Son, God, The Holy Spirit all united as one.
It is to be noted that The Holy Trinity (3 3 3) was derived from The Trinity of Numbers (see proof for full illustration).

This is just self-referential numerology.

It is easy to make snide remarks. But if pondered upon, all would leave this topic a much wiser fellow.

You have been fairly treated. Your claims have been addressed one-by-one, multiple times. You have turned your back and refused to address them. It is you who is not operating in good faith. People are disillusioned with your dishonesty.


Does it not concern you that, to support your beliefs, you've had to make up a bunch of stuff that is easily shown to be false?

Heck, you could simply Google these facts yourself and see that they are false. But you haven't. And you won't, will you. That is the definition of denial.

 

[James R]

Clearly, kingiyk does not want to discuss his strange belief system. He only wants to preach it.

Thread closed.