The Truth: The Mathematical Proof Of God, The Holy Trinity.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I took the risk so you don't have to, 'cos I'm that sort of martyr! ;)
It's nothing but numerology: the pseudo-science that enables you to fit any evidence to any conclusion. Gotta love it. ;)
As for this site, his post breaks a number of rules / etiquettes, but assuming he actually wants to engage further, we can let that slide, I guess. ;)
 
Sarkus said:
I took the risk so you don't have to, 'cos I'm that sort of martyr! ;)
It's nothing but numerology: the pseudo-science that enables you to fit any evidence to any conclusion. Gotta love it. ;)
As for this site, his post breaks a number of rules / etiquettes, but assuming he actually wants to engage further, we can let that slide, I guess. ;)
Click to expand...
Usually a red flag, "I have this amazing proof of "insert claim here" just watch this video."
 
Sarkus said:
I took the risk so you don't have to, 'cos I'm that sort of martyr! ;)
It's nothing but numerology: the pseudo-science that enables you to fit any evidence to any conclusion. Gotta love it. ;)
As for this site, his post breaks a number of rules / etiquettes, but assuming he actually wants to engage further, we can let that slide, I guess. ;)
Click to expand...
Usually a red flag, "I have this amazing proof of "insert claim here" just watch this video."
 
Why don't you make an attempt at disproving the claims? Here is a bet for you: you will always be unsuccessful in your attempts.
 
kingiyk said:
Why don't you make an attempt at disproving the claims? Here is a bet for you: you will always be unsuccessful in your attempts.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, “Prove me wrong!”, the age-old cry of the crank down the centuries.

Actually the way it works is the person making the claim is the one who has to substantiate it.

So, how does your argument go? Note that you are expected, by the forum rules, to post it here, without requiring readers to click on links taking them to other sites on the internet.
 
kingiyk said:
Why don't you make an attempt at disproving the claims? Here is a bet for you: you will always be unsuccessful in your attempts.
Click to expand...
What claims? If you cannot be bothered to put some effort in to explain your claims why should I put effort in to disprove them?
 
kingiyk said:
Why don't you make an attempt at disproving the claims? Here is a bet for you: you will always be unsuccessful in your attempts.
Click to expand...
Unscientific claims quite often defy any argument against them (it's all about Popper's falsification, don't ya know).

So, here's a start, given that this is a science sub-forum (I'd have given you leniency had you posted something in the religion or free thoughts sections):
1. What is your hypothesis / theory / idea?
2. How is it falsifiable?

Can you at least answer those rather than, as it seems, expect people to click on to a suspect link and expect them to garner from that what you're trying to say?
 
From the link above, there is an image of two hands with the caption...

Man was designed to use the Base 10 Numeral System.

Consisting of 10 digits:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

1 is The First or The Beginning Number and The Triune Number 9 is The Highest or The Last.

Notice the flaw here where he states "0" is a digit but does not use it in his calculations, even though the "0" is depicted as the one the fingers of the hands. "0" should be the first of the beginning number blah blah blah...

Is this considered a debunking?
 
(Q) said:
From the link above, there is an image of two hands with the caption...

Man was designed to use the Base 10 Numeral System.

Consisting of 10 digits:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

1 is The First or The Beginning Number and The Triune Number 9 is The Highest or The Last.

Notice the flaw here where he states "0" is a digit but does not use it in his calculations, even though the "0" is depicted as the one the fingers of the hands. "0" should be the first of the beginning number blah blah blah...

Is this considered a debunking?
Click to expand...
we would both agree that there are 10 fingers on the human hands and the counting begins with 1, hence 1 is the beginning number
 
In 312 AD, The phrase "in hoc signo vinces" appeared in a vision to Roman emperor Constantine along with the sign of The cross.
Romans 5:6 reads "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly" Fixing the cross into a time(the ultimate creation) clock is the key to revealing The Truth. Nikola Tesla said “If you only knew the magnificence of the numbers 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” Well, The Proof above provides the magnificence of those numbers. This is The Book with The Seven Seals.

I Am.
 
kingiyk said:
we would both agree that there are 10 fingers on the human hands and the counting begins with 1, hence 1 is the beginning number
Click to expand...
You just contradicted your website. It states that "0" is the first digit, yet you don't use it in your examples. I just debunked your claim.
 
kingiyk said:
In 312 AD, The phrase "in hoc signo vinces" appeared in a vision to Roman emperor Constantine along with the sign of The cross.
Romans 5:6 reads "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly" Fixing the cross into a time(the ultimate creation) clock is the key to revealing The Truth. Nikola Tesla said “If you only knew the magnificence of the numbers 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” Well, The Proof above provides the magnificence of those numbers. This is The Book with The Seven Seals.

I Am.
Click to expand...
None of that makes any sense at all.
 
kingiyk said:
In 312 AD, The phrase "in hoc signo vinces" appeared in a vision to Roman emperor Constantine along with the sign of The cross.
Romans 5:6 reads "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly" Fixing the cross into a time(the ultimate creation) clock is the key to revealing The Truth. Nikola Tesla said “If you only knew the magnificence of the numbers 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” Well, The Proof above provides the magnificence of those numbers. This is The Book with The Seven Seals.

I Am.
Click to expand...
Try and focus on one thing at a time. Romans is nothing to do with Constantine and Tesla is not related to either.

There are a lot of ancient writings and writers, you can pick one or two but why those?

Why not Einstein or Dirac rather than Tesla? Why not a pagan Roman leader, most were? Including Constantine.
 
kingiyk said:
In 312 AD, The phrase "in hoc signo vinces" appeared in a vision to Roman emperor Constantine along with the sign of The cross.
Romans 5:6 reads "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly" Fixing the cross into a time(the ultimate creation) clock is the key to revealing The Truth. Nikola Tesla said “If you only knew the magnificence of the numbers 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” Well, The Proof above provides the magnificence of those numbers. This is The Book with The Seven Seals.

I Am.
Click to expand...
BINGO! Nikola Tesla already, and we’ve barely got started.:biggrin: 50 crank points, straight off the bat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top