No, paddoboy, it is NOT the same possibility that I may be mistaken -
In actual fact most of what you say is a mistake, as is obvious to most, you are driven by other factors.
Your usual "pop science"cop out also adds to the comedy of errors you make.
Let me say again, that all links and articles basically say the same thing, despite your "Hilbert Space" mention:
After all, paddoboy, that is the way that us Real Professionals Learn the Real Science.
I revel in real science and I'm not a professional. Your posts actually reflect something entirely different to anything professional also.
On that score, your non professionalism, as reflected in your posts has been evidenced over most of my 2.5 years on this forum. [or thereabouts: I'll leave you to give us the exact figure
]
We do though obviously have a few professionals on this forum...rpenner being one, Aid another, and of course another old sparring partner of yours who also had to put up with the incoherency in your posts, Trippy,one of the mods we havn't seen for a while.
I suppose that I will have to give your Post A "LIKE", since it is just another one of your "run of the mill" Ad Hominem laden Diatribes that you must assume disguises the fact that you have nothing of any value to add to the discussion.
Yo do what you like my friend, it does not affect me in the least.
It's interesting to note though, that what you deem as adhoms, is just deserved criticism of the actions and meanings of your own posts.
Not only do you have nothing to support your Statement : "[More evidence spacetime is real]", you will not even provide anything to SUPPORT your BLATANT AD HOMINEMS.
For instance, PLEASE provide your EVIDENCE that I, dmoe, "have a barrow to push" and that that "barrow" is "totally irrelevant".
The article itself is evidence that it supports the reality of spacetime. Add that to the other obvious facts about spacetime, and the case for its reality is strong.
On your request for evidence for your barow you are pushing, I'll leave that one as I'm sure that is obvious to most on this forum that are familiar with your antics, including the mods.
So...did you completely read : http:
www.academia.edu/15752968Rainbow_metric_from_quantum_gravity ?
If you did READ it, would you be so kind as to Post the "QUOTE" of where it STATES that it is : "[More evidence spacetime is real]" ?
Don't be so naive. The article was presenting a quantum method of revealing spacetime for what it is. It was not concerned with the question that we are discussing on this forum now.
Obviously though, like the god, the fact that you reject the BB...or is that really you do not accept the BB?
, is evident that you certainly have an agenda to misrepresent cosmology whenever you can, particularly of course when your's truly is pushing the "science barrow"
If you do not want to get into Questions and Answers, then why Pray Tell do you Post on a Science Forum - Heck if you do not want to participate in Finding Answers to Questions - then you must simply be feigning any TRUE interest in TRUE SCIENCE.
Perhaps, as usual, you took that the wrong way...I'm speaking of questions with an agenda behind them, questions that are not genuine in acquiring an answer to gain knowledge, but questions that are designed to attempt to deride and treat with scorn......much as most of our anti science cranks are apt to do.
Not really: just valid criticism of errors and stupidity in your posts.
So...just more paddoboy...doing whatever it is that you think qualifies as what you see as MAINSTREAM SCIENCE !
paddoboy, is this all that you can profer ?
You are the one that suddenly decides to take offence at a few
I find it rather funny [funny peculiar, not funny haha] how any level headed person could misconstrue something that has been evident since the new forum format came into vogue
Why do you not simply TRY TO LEARN, paddoboy?
I'm learning all the time, you?
To quote the late great Frank Zappa, “A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it is not open.”
But first you must have a parachute....or a mind.
And dmoe, obviously you will reply, so I'll let you have that for free, OK?
Quantum particles of different energies sense different properties of spacetime. The effect is similar to the dispersion of light in prism: photons of different energies sense the same prism as having slightly different properties. Image courtesy FUW. For a larger version of this image please go here.
