Asexperia
Registered Senior Member
There's that pseudo-word "magnitive" again...
You mean new-word "magnitive".
There's that pseudo-word "magnitive" again...
You mean new-word "magnitive".
Love the term word saladThere's that pseudo-word "magnitive" again...
This is just word salad, plain and simple.
Wonder why the word is just not submitted to Mirriam Webster?
Well stop posting itI'm not interested.
Well stop posting it
Nobody here is interested in it either
From this forum?You aren't interested, but 2,514 views say the opposite since October 18.
You do realize that, from a glance, it appears the bulk of those views are the same few of us here that are trying to explain to you why you are wrong, yes?You aren't interested, but 2,514 views say the opposite since October 18.
THE MEASURE OF TIME
To measure time, two tools are required:
1- A periodic phenomenon, like the movements of the Earth and clocks.
2- The chromnesia or temporary memory.
With no chromnesia we would only think of the present. Because of chromnesia, older people think in decades or even centuries. But Physics only considers the use of clocks.
In the chromnesia we relate the different units and periods of time.
We measure the past time (duration) and we project this measure into the future.
The most accurate clocks would not be useful if we did not have chromnesia.
But Physics only considers the use of clocks.
Talking to yourself again? You really should break the habitIn the others magnitudes (length, temperature, mass, etc,) only
is required that the observer verifies the measure (in the instrument).
Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be
affected for the speed and gravity. Time wouldn't be relative
if they used a perfect clock.
I am waiting for the construction of the perfect clock.
Correct - just as every other process that depends on time is affected.Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be affected for the speed and gravity.
Yes, they would. A perfect clock measures time perfectly in its own reference frame. That is not the same as measuring time perfectly in other reference frames. They are all different, and depend on the speed of the frame.Time wouldn't be relative if they used a perfect clock.
OK. You will be disappointed when that perfect clock works like all our other (nearly perfect) clocks.I am waiting for the construction of the perfect clock.
Correct and all future clocks will also be affected by speed and gravity.Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be
affected for the speed and gravity
The count could be that high because (as in my case) people are just dropping by to chuckle at your silliness, not because they are interested.You aren't interested, but 2,514 views say the opposite since October 18.
If humanity never reaches the limits of GR and quantum theory, yes. So, you are so pessimistic that there will never be found a new, more fundamental theory?Correct and all future clocks will also be affected by speed and gravity.
Current and future rulers are also affected by speed and gravity.