]To be honest , I don't wish to spend much time talking to you because I know something of your track record which includes an inability to understand a straifghtforward statement. I've been waiting about a week now for your "proof" that Plato was not a pantheist, despite my having given you references to his works which clearly show that he was.
What you have written above is a good example of how you misinterpret what is said and then try to score points. I have done no more than suggest that the next president must be scientifically literate. Must one always spell out the obvious just for you ? That a president must be a statesman is self -evident. Have I said otherwise ?
Please note that I shall ignore any further posts you make on this thread.