Any objective person with common sense would be suspicious on seeing this. What do you pro-Apollo people say
Well Freddy that video was very compelling and I would be surprised if anyone could get thru it without conceeding that the presentation raises various points that as you say could not make one suspicious.
If the video has no edited material relating to communication there certainly is prima facie evidence to support a claim that the conversations in question could not be between two people one on the Earth and one one the Moon. If those who say we went to the Moon can not see the implications of this aspect I would be surprised however I do think that there is the possibility that we went to the Moon however the "movie" could have been produced in a studio. I think there is a great deal in the video that strongly suggests that "the movie" could be made on a Set.
Certainly the radiation exposure during the trip makes one wonder but the fact is, in my case, I have no way of quantifying the radiation or it's effect on a human. I understand the suits have deteriorated so may not be around for their ability to protect to be looked at...anyways I can not comment as I dont know any numbers or if I had them what they mean...This is the way anyone who is not an expert must approach that aspect.
What does concern me in general is how the radiation during the entire course of the mission appears not appear to have had any effect whatsoever on the photographic film..one must expect there would be a huge effect on film and it will be interesting to find out how NASA via their camera and film experts produced such great photos showing no signs of being degraded by radiation....and whilst on the photography aspect, and only a couple of days ago discussing frozen film with a astrophotographer, one wonders how any camera could work or how the film could be moved in the camera..in the days of astrophotograghy with film they would freeze the film and this chap said they had to make plates with a single frame of film because it was so brittle it could not be used in a camera....no doubt NASA would have addressed these matters.
The lighting is entirely suggestive of a studio and I doubt that can be dismissed easily if at all...and here there is plenty of commentary by experts stating on many occassions that the lighting could not come from the Sun.
What I found interesting was the general construction of the craft...it really did surprise me and I think it is inconsistent with my expectations and for this reason the video I found an eye openner...
Anyways all I saw I find consistent with the Moon landing having been filmed on a Set and expect there will be those who can argue the opposite...
However that leaves use with a movie made on a Set, which may have been the only way to give the public what they wanted to see...what is covered in the video does not establish that the actual trip did or did not take place.
The loss of the plans and data is simply unbelievable but why need not be answered...
Now for all of you who think I have gone crazy do not dare to comment unless you watch the video as if you think you want to argue about this you must watch the video as my comments are on the video...and to dismiss what you imagine is in it without seeing it would be silly.
I usually just don't watch these things thinking they are nonsense but the fact is you end up not seeing what folk are so concerned about...
So Freddy you must be happy but note my comment that there is no proof we did not go but I do think it could be done on set, that seems a reasonable conclusion in my view, but I don't have a problem with that...in fact it makes more sense to me to do it that way leaving the guys who went there doing more than taking movies to making taxpayers happy.
Alex
