The Funniest Denial of Science and Reason That I Have Ever Heard

Many religious people don't believe in science just as many scientists don't believe in religions.
 
However, you don't understand the comedy of the video.
Is there any reason I should?
Is the entire thing funny or is it just the odd humorous line interspersed throughout the 2 and a quarter hours that you (somehow) expect us to watch with no explanation?
 

Oh no!

I see this is "9-11 Scholars for Truth". I'm going to report this with a request that it be moved to the Conspiracies section.

(Like Dywyddyr and most others here, I would not for a moment consider watching a 2hr video, just because some fellow on the internet brings it to my attention. But least of all when the subject seems to be a ludicrous 9-11 conspiracy theory.)
 
Is the entire thing funny or is it just the odd humorous line interspersed throughout the 2 and a quarter hours that you (somehow) expect us to watch with no explanation?
The entire video (which starts at the 25 second mark) is funny because the chemistry professor only wants to discuss facts and science while the BBC reporter behaves much like the exchemist that is outraged that anyone believes in a scientific view that isn't approved by the US goberment.
 
The entire video (which starts at the 25 second mark) is funny because the chemistry professor only wants to discuss facts and science while the BBC reporter behaves much like the exchemist that is outraged that anyone believes in a scientific view that isn't approved by the US goberment.
Or maybe it's funny because a certain nutcase thinks that the chemistry professor is discussing facts and science.
 
Or maybe it's funny because a certain nutcase thinks that the chemistry professor is discussing facts and science.
It is true that I agree with the chemistry professor. Is it true that your understanding of the facts and science coincides with that of the BBC reporter?
 
I see this is "9-11 Scholars for Truth". I'm going to report this with a request that it be moved to the Conspiracies section.
That too would be comical since Dr Niels Harrit refused to speculate and insisted repeatedly that he was only qualified to talk about science and evidence.
 
No. The subject is "How dare anyone discuss scientific facts that aren't approved by the powers that be?"
Given that you've consistently shown yourself to not understand science I find THAT rather more amusing than the OP.
 
Given that you've consistently shown yourself to not understand science I find THAT rather more amusing than the OP.
Then feel free to start a thread on that. It would be very short since I would ask for proof and you wouldn't be able to produce anything valid. This thread however is about a distinguished chemistry professor that angers a faith-based non-scientist that obviously disrespects science.
 
Then feel free to start a thread on that. It would be very short since I would ask for proof and you wouldn't be able to produce anything valid.
I agree. Apart from linking to some of the unscientific crap you spread in the various threads you've started I wouldn't be able to produce anything at all.

This thread however is about a distinguished chemistry professor that angers a faith-based non-scientist that obviously disrespects science.
Nope, it's about a nutcase claiming that a chemistry professor who's talking bollocks is somehow being "scientific" (oh look! More support for my claim about you).
 
Back
Top