Don't toy with us George...I'm about done here James R
Don't toy with us George...I'm about done here James R
Don't toy with us George...
Especially when I go technicolour.My font is bigger than yours, which means ideas are truer than yours, HA!
Says the man from Cape Cod.QED there really is a God!
"had to be"?100 years ago Thomas Edison discovered that the
“frame rate” of movie film had to be 16 frames/sec
This is (part of) your problem, Mr. Hammond: just making shit up on the fly and hoping noone notices.IOW the perceptual speed of the average adult of average intelligence was 16 bits/sec.
He did?Moreover, he discovered the rate increased linearly with age in children under 18
"quite obviously", you say.– quite obviously due to brain growth.
What is the method of measuring "mental speed"?So here we have a simple method of measuring “mental speed” and at the same time an ordinary tape measure can be used to measure the size
(height) of a given subject.
Sure, and you need to explain what you mean by "Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime", because at the moment all you have suggested is that there is a means to measure "mental speed" (albeit not actually explained what that means is, and how it achieves it) as well as physical size.What we are trying to prove is that simple growth causes an “Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime” in the growing individual's perception.
Utter garbage.So let’s keep this simple and direct. It is known
That: –
1 – a 9-year-old can watch a movie at 7 frames/sec
and not notice the difference – while an 18-year-old
will see the frames clearly jumping by.
More garbage, Mr. Hammond.2 – objects appear twice as a large to a 9-year-old
as they do to an 18-year-old because he is only half
grown.
Based on the data it would be a 75% "magnification" (i.e. reduction).This represents a 50% “magnification of space” and a 50% “dilation of time” – for a half grown person!
Anyone can plug made-up numbers into a maths formula, or a computer program, and claim that because the computer program outputs a result that it must therefore mean the numbers are verified, and the result verified etc....
So, as we can see, a simple magnification of space
and a simple equal dilation of time – caused by simple
GROWTH – does indeed produce an: –
Einsteinian curvature of human
subjective spacetime
Stop lying.Now for those of you that have been following this thread I have shown that Psychometry has found a similar curvature (higher order factor) of the Psychometry "metric" of |ENPg| which is a "spacetime metric" also;
Again, without any evidence, reason, or actual science.which they call the GFP and which I have identified as the God of the Bible,
Again, without any evidence, reason, or actual science....since the 2nd order (lower factors) turned out to be the "gods".
Who can create the universe?This of course indicates that "God" is in fact a "fully grown man"...
Again showing you still don't understand those terms.– and of course no one in the history of the world has ever actually seen such a person – but he is known to "exist" inside our bodies as the "genotype" of which we are the less than fully grown "phenotype".
[insert made-up conclusion that I've been trying to prove, and just thrown things together in the hope noone notices the glaring flaws and lack of, well, sense]Hence we have the final result – that: –...
...God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of subjective spacetime
QED you're demonstrably a crank, and utterly dishonest.QED there really is a God!
We have TeX support built in. Enclose your TeX code with [tex][/tex] tags.Unfortunately your posting system makes it very
difficult to write advanced mathematics since
there is no "equation editor".
Utter garbage.
Please, stop making shit up, Mr. Hammond.
You could just respond to Baldeee's valid questions with the evidence to back up your claims, unfortunately there is no such evidence.[GE Hammond MS physics]
Get off it Baldeee – you wouldn't know
the Ricci Tensor from the Kon Tiki
George
The Kon Tiki is a cube.[GE Hammond MS physics]
Get off it Baldeee – you wouldn't know
the Ricci Tensor from the Kon Tiki
George
Okay, we are trying to demonstrate that:
“God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of subjective spacetime.
100 years ago Thomas Edison discovered that the
“frame rate” of movie film had to be 16 frames/sec
IOW the perceptual speed of the average adult of
average intelligence was 16 bits/sec. Moreover, he
discovered the rate increased linearly with age in
children under 18 – quite obviously due to
brain growth.
So here we have a simple method of measuring
“mental speed” and at the same time an ordinary
tape measure can be used to measure the size
(height) of a given subject.
What we are trying to prove is that simple growth
causes an “Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime”
in the growing individual's perception.
So let’s keep this simple and direct. It is known
That: –
1 – a 9-year-old can watch a movie at 7 frames/sec
and not notice the difference – while an 18-year-old
will see the frames clearly jumping by.
2 – objects appear twice as a large to a 9-year-old
as they do to an 18-year-old because he is only half
grown.
This represents a 50% “magnification of space” and
a 50% “dilation of time” – for a half grown person!
Now, the metric of objective space-time is known to be:
ds2 = dx2+ dy2+ dz2 – dt2 or abbreviated: (1,1,1,-1)
Now suppose, due to incomplete growth, we want to
Write the metric of subjective space-time for a less than
fully grown person – if we assume the magnification of
length and time is a simple multiplication factor “m”,
(which would be m=2 for the 9-year-old) we would write
ds2 = m2 (dx2+ dy2+ dz2 – dt2 ) or: m2 (1,1,1,-1)
If for convenience we set: m2 = a then we have: –
|a 0 0 0|
|0 a 0 0| = ds2
|0 0 a 0|
|0 0 0-a|
Okay, now what we want to know is; does this
simple “magnification of subjective space-time”
CAUSE a “curvature of subjective space-time”?
And for that it turns out that there are desktop
computer programs (such as Maxima and
Mathematica ) which will easily compute the
curvature – from the metric, and in this case
what we want is the so called “Ricci scalar
curvature –R”, and the Maxima computer
program yields this result: –
Input matrix:
|a 0 0 0|
|0 a 0 0|
|0 0 a 0|
|0 0 0-a|
Output (scalar curvature) = R =
6a (att) – 3(at)2
2a3
(where the subscript "t" means the derivative
with respect to time – i.e. the person is still growing)
The 2nd time derivative can be ignored, leaving us
with the simple equation for R which is: –
– 3(at)2 = R
2a3
And since we put a = m2 we see that
– 3(2mmt)2 = R
2m6
Or:
-6(mt)2 = -3(mt/m2 )2 = R = (scalar curvature)
2m4
So, as we can see, a simple magnification of space
and a simple equal dilation of time – caused by simple
GROWTH – does indeed produce an: –
Einsteinian curvature of human
subjective spacetime
Now for those of you that have been
following this thread I have shown
that Psychometry has found a similar
curvature (higher order factor) of the
Psychometry "metric" of |ENPg| which
is a "spacetime metric" also; which they
call the GFP and which I have identified
as the God of the Bible, since the 2nd order
(lower factors) turned out to be the "gods".
This of course indicates that "God" is in fact
a "fully grown man" – and of course no one
in the history of the world has ever actually
seen such a person – but he is known to "exist"
inside our bodies as the "genotype" of which
we are the less than fully grown "phenotype".
Hence we have the final result – that: –
God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of subjective spacetime
QED there really is a God!
George
But none of the mathematics mentions God at all.So as you can see, half a dozen of the
RIEMANN TENSOR complements
are NON-ZERO !!
Which means that the space-time
is CURVED. That is absolute mathematical
proof of the nonzero curvature!
"Here lies George E HammondSort of like chiseling it on my
tombstone !
[GE Hammond MS physics]
I had some last thoughts, that the above equation might not be correct – so I asked someone on sci.physics.relativity to double check it on Mathematica. Someone had checked it about 7
years ago and said that it was correct – but I didn't ask him to actually check that the Riemann tensor itself was nonzero.
So I got back on sci.physics.relativity and asked again
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/ng-O2GGqczM/m/rixDt1GGBQAJ[George]
Yes – this is not a "gravitational" problem, it actually comes from an unrelated academic field of research,
where yes, the space is actually contracting
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/ng-O2GGqczM/m/lhjO3xXwBAAJ[George]It is a matter of considerable and urgent importance to research (unrelated to gravity) in another academic field which I will not mention (but related to psychology).
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/ng-O2GGqczM/m/rixDt1GGBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/ng-O2GGqczM/m/lhjO3xXwBAAJ
I too have used maths in post #1214 to show fairies exist. My equation was also correct.
You're so desperate to make your belief in a god real.[GE Hammond MS physics]
Yes and Troglodytes exist also, but they're 1st-Order Psychometry eigenvectors; the Olympian "gods" are 2nd order Psychometry eigenvectors – and "God" is the top, single,Psychometry eigenvector at the 4th order.
And BTW, the 4 Psychometry eigenvectors at the 3rd Order are Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn !
– That's you, me and the rest of the posse !
George.
You're so desperate to make your belief in a god real.