The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
George E Hammond said:
In the meantime, I will be posting additional
commentary on the matter of this result being an
"Einsteinian curvature of subjective reality".
George

foghorn said:
[GE Hammond MS physics] Resident of Pseudoscience.
So, does that mean you're just going to use this thread as your personal notice board/pulpit?
You may be changing your residence to Cesspoool that way George.
Click to expand...

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Look, Foghorn neither you nor Baldeee seem to
recognize what the SPOG is, or who Hammond is.

Hammond is another Faraday – and his discovery
of the SPOG is an ACCIDENT. Faraday accidentally
discovered the EM field (electric motor) and Sir
Humphrey Davy tried to crucify him. And that's
what Bsaldeee is trying to do to Hammond.

I don't think the Sciforums administration is about
to do anything that rash, and take a chance on the
utter public devastation that could ultimately rain
down on their heads – when Hammond, like
Faraday is finally discovered to be CORRECT.

Chill out –

George
 
George E Hammond said:
Look, Foghorn neither you nor Baldeee seem to recognize what the SPOG is, or who Hammond is.
Click to expand...
Yeah, we do: it's demonstrably garbage, and he's demonstrably a crank.
See, we recognise both for what they are.
All the evidence is in the past 60 pages or so, and however many more you intend this fiasco to go on for.

Anyhoo:
"Okay, in the 25 years since I discovered the SPOG in 1997 – in the hundreds and hundreds of people that I have explained it to – you are the only other person on Earth who actually comprehends it." - post #1170
"... I am frankly astonished that a person with your meager scientific credentials has been able to comprehend Hammond's SPOG in its entirety..." - post #1177
And now it's back to not recognising what it is.
If only I could tie my shoelaces as consistently. :rolleyes:
Hammond is another Faraday...
Click to expand...
Delusion of grandeur: check
– and his discovery of the SPOG is an ACCIDENT. Faraday accidentally discovered the EM field (electric motor) and Sir Humphrey Davy tried to crucify him. And that's what Bsaldeee is trying to do to Hammond.
Click to expand...
A version of the Galileo Gambit: check.
I don't think the Sciforums administration is about to do anything that rash, and take a chance on the utter public devastation that could ultimately rain down on their heads – when Hammond, like Faraday is finally discovered to be CORRECT.
Click to expand...
Consigning your garbage to the cesspool would not be rash, since it is not going to be discovered to be anything other than the landfill it will eventually become.

But hey, as long as it keeps you happy, and I guess you aren't contaminating actual science threads with your nonsense.
 
George E Hammond said:
Hammond is another Faraday – and his discovery
of the SPOG is an ACCIDENT.
Click to expand...

"... an accident is something that you wouldn't do over again if you had the chance. A surprise is something you didn't even know you wanted until you got it."
-- Roseanne Barr​
 
sideshowbob said:
"... an accident is something that you wouldn't do over again if you had the chance. A surprise is something you didn't even know you wanted until you got it."
-- Roseanne Barr​
Click to expand...

So you're saying you believe Roseanne when she says discovering something on accident is something you wouldn't do over again?

My reply is I would rather be lucky than good. Look how much of science was discovered accidentally, and I certainly would want it done again.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Newton developed Calculus.

I don't think that was an accident.
Click to expand...

[GE Hammond MS physics]
...No, Newton's discovery of calculus certainly was not
an accident. Neither was Einstein's discovery of the
Lorentz covariant law of gravity. Although I think
Nordstrom's early suggestion that we simply substitute
the 4- dimensional wave operator for the
three-dimensional (del-squared operator) in Newton's
law of gravity – came very close to it.

However, Faraday's discovery of the EM field
certainly was an accident – he just happened to notice
that a magnetic compass lying near an electrical
wire suddenly swung around when he threw the switch
to the wire. That was a bona fide ACCIDENT.
Also Hammond's discovery of the SPOG
(Scientific Proof of God) was also an ACCIDENT.

Hammond was searching for the SMOP, the long lost
Structural Model of Personality in psychology, and
he actually found it! Hammond noticed that the
Psychometrists kept reporting the odd fact that
the intercorrelation of their personality vectors
seemed to be "CUBICALLY INTERCORRELATED !
Hammond investigated that fact and soon discovered
that it was caused by the "cubic embryological
cleavage of the brain" itself.
Since a cube has 13 symmetry axes it soon became
obvious that the data showed that there were 13
"Personality Types" and that they were cubically
intercorrelated.
This soon led to the realization that the 2nd order
personality eigenvectors were in fact physically
axiomatic and canonical and therefore the GODS
of antiquity (e.g. the 12 Olympian gods)

About that time Prof. Paul Barrett a former colleague
of Hans Eysenck's informed Hammond that a
TOP, FINAL, SOLITARY EIGENVECTOR had been
found at the 4th order in psychometry (Musek,
Rushton, Irwing, others) and the psychometrists
had dubbed it the "GFP" (General Factor of
Psychology).

Well – since Hammond had already discovered
that the 2nd orders were in fact the "gods"
it was immediately OBVIOUS to Hammond
that the top eigenvector (the GFP) absolutely
couldn't be anything other than the
"God of the Bible" – GOD himself!

So we see, that the discovery of the
Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) was actually
and ACCIDENT – just like Faraday's
discovery of the electromagnetic field !

George
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Are you being serious with me?
Click to expand...

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Of course I'm being serious – I'm 80 years old
I don't have time to fool around anymore – of
course I'm being serious.

Look Beer n' Straw, I said in my post #1186
to you – the following: –

Well – since Hammond had already discovered
that the 2nd orders were in fact the "gods"
it was immediately OBVIOUS to Hammond
that the top eigenvector (the GFP) absolutely
couldn't be anything other than the
"God of the Bible" – GOD himself!

So we see, that the discovery of the
Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) was actually
and ACCIDENT – just like Faraday's
discovery of the electromagnetic field !

[Hammond:]
What I'm saying is that I never thought about
"God" in my entire life – I didn't even believe
there was a God – until voila – the world's first
scientific proof of God literally appeared right
before my eyes, ACCIDENTALLY, while I was
searching for the SMOP – the long-lost
Structural Model of Personality

Therefore – my discovery of the world's first
scientific proof of God (SPOG) was a

TOTALLY UNEXPECTED ACCIDENT

Just like Faraday's discovery of the EM field
was an accident !

George
 
You're over twice my age then.

You said you were living close to a nuclear missile. Did decades of the idea of nuclear war affect you mentally?
 
George E Hammond said:
What I'm saying is that I never thought about
"God" in my entire life – I didn't even believe
there was a God – until voila – the world's first
scientific proof of God literally appeared right
before my eyes, ACCIDENTALLY,
Click to expand...
That sounds suspiciously like every religious fanatic telling us he used to be an atheist.
 
sideshowbob said:
That sounds suspiciously like every religious fanatic telling us he used to be an atheist.
Click to expand...

[GE Hammond MS physics]

You talk the talk but
you can't walk the walk

Let's hear you or anyone else, make
"one significant scientific objection"
to the SPOG and I will respond –
but "ad hominem heckle-baiting"
isn't even "openers" in this
Poker game.

George

 
Beer w/Straw said:
You're over twice my age then.

You said you were living close to a nuclear missile. Did decades of the idea of nuclear war affect you mentally?
Click to expand...

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Na... I live on Cape Cod practically within sight of
JFK's house on Squaw Island. The place is crawling
with state and local police and federal agents at all
times since there are 350 members of the Kennedy
clan, many of them public officials, who visit there
frequently. There are no "nuclear missile sites" in the
state of Massachusetts that I'm aware of, much less
anywhere near summer resort area Cape Cod.

George
 
George being an accidental extra in Jaws would be his biggest achievement.

Sorry, was brainstorming a Far Side comics strip...

Do carry on outing yourself as one of the biggest current cranks around, mr great Hammond.
 
George E Hammond said:
Let's hear you or anyone else, make
"one significant scientific objection"
Click to expand...
Logical objections come before scientific objections and your nonsense is riddled with logical errors.
George E Hammond said:
but "ad hominem heckle-baiting"...
Click to expand...
Why is it that cranks never understand what an ad hominem is?

If I say you're wrong because you're an idiot, that's an ad hominem. If I say you're wrong and you're also an idiot, that's not an ad hominem
George E Hammond said:
... isn't even "openers" in this
Poker game.
Click to expand...
See above. Logical objections open.
 
George E Hammond said:
Let's hear you or anyone else, make
"one significant scientific objection"
to the SPOG and I will respond –
Click to expand...
Don't be silly, George.

Baldeee already spent some time tearing your "proof" to pieces. As for my questions and objections, well, you've mostly pretended not to hear them. It's a waste of my time trying to engage with you. That's why I'm mostly just posting the occasional comment from the sidelines on this.
 
Kristoffer said:
George being an accidental extra in Jaws would be his biggest achievement.

Sorry, was brainstorming a Far Side comics strip...

Do carry on outing yourself as one of the biggest current cranks around, mr great Hammond.
Click to expand...
Crank or nutter, though?

I'm inclined to think nutter. Which is why I'm not engaging George.
 
James R said:
Don't be silly, George.

Baldeee already spent some time tearing your "proof" to pieces. As for my questions and objections, well, you've mostly pretended not to hear them. It's a waste of my time trying to engage with you. That's why I'm mostly just posting the occasional comment from the sidelines on this.
Click to expand...

GE Hammond MS physics]
I'm about done here James R, but there are a few
last posts concerning the Relativity connection to
the SPOG, which demonstrate conclusively that: –

God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of subjective space-time

Using the "Ricci scalar curvature" (essentially the
Gaussian curvature) of 4 dimensional space-time.

Fortunately, using Maxima and Mathematica the
final result is exceedingly neat and concise and as
clear as Mountain Springwater, and only a page
long !

Unfortunately your posting system makes it very
difficult to write advanced mathematics since
there is no "equation editor".

Fortunately Microsoft Word has a powerful
equation editor and I am writing the next post
using that – although it is quite tedious to do
so – and it will appear in a few days when I
finally get it composed.

George
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top