I have to admit, Bw/S, sometimes you really crack me up. It breaks up the monotony.I am not well versed in an argument for Noah's Ark.
I was more interested in sex.
I have to admit, Bw/S, sometimes you really crack me up. It breaks up the monotony.I am not well versed in an argument for Noah's Ark.
I was more interested in sex.
That's not correct: not demonstrating an ability on demand does not falsify that the person has the capability, or has done it in the past.The rock will never move. Hence, the power of prayer is falsified.
And so, we should pray to God all the time to give us the wisdom.If Quantum Mechanics controls our thoughts then our thoughts would have to be indeterminate.
And therefore untrustworthy.
Sure. (I will go with your archaic word for science.)
Scientists can predict what will happen inside a nuclear reactor with great accuracy. Specifically, they can set up a reactor, fuel it, withdraw the control rods, and see exactly (to within a tenth of a percent or so) the energy production they expect. They do this via science; the process of experimentation, hypothesis, test, then validation. The process called science works.
And so, we should pray to God all the time to give us the wisdom.
The processes of the brain have evolved to to think in terms of macro outcomes.And Quantum Mechanics applied to our brain makes your thoughts indeterminate and untrustworthy.
True. I guess it would be more accurate to say that no experiment has ever demonstrated the existence of the supernatural.That's not correct: not demonstrating an ability on demand does not falsify that the person has the capability, or has done it in the past.
Natural philosophy is the archaic term for science, yes.Yes Naturalism is indeed archaic, just as you said.
Natural philosophy IS science.Science cannot be used to prove Naturalism, such an experiment has never even been attempted.
You just contradicted yourself.Again, the Scientifically known and proven, cause and affect limitations at the scale of our brain chemistry and neurological pathways prove you have no free will. (See Sam Harris) And Quantum Mechanics applied to our brain makes your thoughts indeterminate and untrustworthy.
Duh. Of course our thoughts are untrustworthy.If Quantum Mechanics controls our thoughts then our thoughts would have to be indeterminate.
And therefore untrustworthy.
Natural philosophy is the archaic term for science, yes.
Natural philosophy IS science.
You just contradicted yourself.
Either we have no free will and everything is predetermined, or things are NOT predetermined and thus free will is possible. You can't have it both ways.
We've covered this. If God is omniscient, and knows what you will do, you have no free will to do anything else.Or we actually do have free will, because we all have supernatural minds, spirits, or souls.
We've covered this. If God is omniscient, and knows what you will do, you have no free will to do anything else.
Then you are not free to make any other decisions. Simple.God simply knows what my free will decisions will be.
The processes of the brain have evolved to to think in terms of macro outcomes.
Our bodies have evolved from processes that work on a scale after the averaging out of quantum uncertainly.
The same for plants, they turn to follow the sun without thinking, where is the quantum uncertainty there?
I know I can put six small eggs in an egg box made for six small eggs, where is the quantum uncertainly there?
Chemical reactions are probabilistic, not deterministic.are our thoughts just the results of an unending chain of bio-chemical reactions?
Chemical reactions are probabilistic, not deterministic.
Chemical reactions are probabilistic, not deterministic.