The biggest mistake ever made is in NOT realizing that time is relative, thus finite, thus infinitely many times, countless times, times (invariably plural) paralleling vertically and horizontally, never one time in any case! The big mistake made by cosmological physicists is in wrongly attempting to reduce time to a naked singularity, a single arrow of time. Not even the observable universe is singular regarding time but is observably many times . . . and none of those eternally many times (many histories), those eternally many worlds, will ever disappear from a locality of relativity of "observable universe."
Trying to find a minimal, or maximal, singular unit of time, one time overall soft and stretchable as dough (so to speak), one universe of time, will always be an exercise in futility. Times (an infinite plurality only!) aren't soft, they are hard as diamond, so to speaking, always breaking in and out to countless many points and/or frames of times.
The mistake is in NOT REALLY understanding the meaning of relativity or why Albert Einstein wanted it called the "Theory of Invariance" (or "Invariability") rather than the "Theory of Relativity."
-----------------------------
"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other...." -- 'Sherlock Holmes: A Study in Scarlet', by Arthur Canon Doyle.
(From a dollop of light, a logician could infer the possibility of an observable universe or a flowing stream of light without having seen or heard of one or the other.)
Trying to find a minimal, or maximal, singular unit of time, one time overall soft and stretchable as dough (so to speak), one universe of time, will always be an exercise in futility. Times (an infinite plurality only!) aren't soft, they are hard as diamond, so to speaking, always breaking in and out to countless many points and/or frames of times.
The mistake is in NOT REALLY understanding the meaning of relativity or why Albert Einstein wanted it called the "Theory of Invariance" (or "Invariability") rather than the "Theory of Relativity."
-----------------------------
"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other...." -- 'Sherlock Holmes: A Study in Scarlet', by Arthur Canon Doyle.
(From a dollop of light, a logician could infer the possibility of an observable universe or a flowing stream of light without having seen or heard of one or the other.)
Last edited: