Suggestions criticism from Bishadi

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by Bishadi, Jul 10, 2009.

  1. Bishadi Banned Banned

    Suggestions and criticisms, from Bishadi

    this site used to be fun

    as many offered a bunch of diversisty

    No banning should be done without reasons offered.

    No thread should be moved just because the moderators don't like the material contradicting what they believe.

    This is a science forum in which people are supposed to share material information.

    I suggest the moderations be based on evidence and no beliefs or accepted paradigm.

    I suggest any fool who contradicts a post be liable to posting evidence over accepted ideology.

    I criticize the moderating of Ben in the physics math section for being unable to observe material that HE does not understand (that scientist are currently working on all over the world; nothing is pseudo as evidence and scientific integrity is being applied)
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2009
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    If you do not enjoy being here then by all means leave, no one is stopping you.

    But information which is based upon fact, not conjecture by a few.

    Accepted by who? Can you give sources which are credible?
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. Bishadi Banned Banned

    i am not here just to play

    i come to read and learn

    if what i have come across can assist others, i post threads (that is my MO)

    and to have material evidence in and from experiments is what is most important for others to have a balance of data to observe.

    eg.... black holes aint a fact; never have been, but them kinds of thread run and no one says a thing.

    the thread BEN moved from physics-math, to cesspool

    that is a thread offering evidence and the moderation was based on the ignorance of accepted ideology over observing the evidence.

    if the evidence was wrong then the mods should be assisting folks in comprehending why; not just moving a thread because a specific person posted it.

    if the people who run this site do not want me here; then just say it!

    but the trolls and mods are too stubborn and often rude beyond belief.

    i will learn from anyone but if the so called 'moderators' are supposed to be leaders in their field and cannot articulate; then they are the wrong folks to have measuring/monitoring the forum.

    it is almost like having a single religious leader running a forum of many religions; they will maintain their bias often based on ignorance
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    The post that was moved directly contravened the rules of the sub-forum.
    It's that simple.
  8. Bishadi Banned Banned

    that is a bold faced LIE!

    nothing broke the rules as i read through them directly before i opened another thread on that section

    that is why i opened this thread!

    i followed exactly what the rules represent (and my own thread name from ben) before i posted it; just to make sure

    so your claim is a LIE, period!

    the thread was moved because it came from me and for others to read it, then any will find, that much of what has been said is really occuring within the sciences.

    your problem is Oli, you have no moral fortitude or honesty within your opinions

    and the post claiming what you did above is direct PROOF!
  9. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    You really should learn English. The phrase is "bald-faced".

    Ben's thread entitled "The Bishadi Mandate" explains that you should summarise, not cut and paste.

    No you didn't.

    You do like to confirm your own hypocrisy.

    Says the liar and idiot.

    Proof that you can't understand instructions?
  10. Bishadi Banned Banned

    bold-faced lying

    is what you are doing

    you feel you have the right and will BS no matter what anyone says

    the comments in exact are

    seems every word you said in your line was wrong, again

    and if any read the thread, they will see; a fw lines of the article were shared, the evidence with pubs was shared and an analogy was shared

    the only thing off, was the line 'energy upon mass' and that just pisses you off.
  11. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    8 lines of your own "work" including "filler" and 23 lines of cut and paste.
    Wrong again.
    Bald-faced lies from Bishadi.
    I DO wish you'd learn to write and understand English, it can't be too hard, after all small children manage it.
  12. Bishadi Banned Banned


    Oli, you are a troll!

    23 lines of evidence and alternative opinions (not mine)

    and a short summary to allow the bridging to be understood

    links to verify the evidence and even see the math of the pubs and the scientists locations

    all in good intent, of good resource, and with little opinion to allow anyone to observe the evidence themselves

    then a dialogue between people can be left open so others can add

    kind of like what a forum is for!
  13. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    Nope: tell you what, create a thread and see who the real troll is.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    You didn't summarise, you simply cut and pasted.
    And then left it up to everyone to read the entire lot of articles and respond.
  14. Bishadi Banned Banned

    again; you are a trolling liar

    Originally Posted by Oli
    8 lines of your own "work" including "filler" and 23 lines of cut and paste.

    i did summarize and why you hate the idea or words combined that say quite clearly

    'energy upon mass"

    as that just bugs you to no end


    i could care less if you a mod, the owner of the site or GOD himself

    you a troll and will lie all day long to keep your position!
  15. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    More crap.
    I don't have a position and you're the liar.
  16. Bishadi Banned Banned


    i rest my case.

    Oli is a troll (proven even within this thread)

    and the moderation is weak in which trolls like Oli are allowed to just rant with nothing to support their position!
  17. Oli Heute der Enteteich... Registered Senior Member

    All you've proven is your total inability to see the truth.
  18. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Bishadi, stop abusing entropy please.
  19. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    You seem to think that because we say "Bishadi, do you even understand this stuff?" or "You're incorrect in your claimed interpretation of that" that we're proclaiming thge papers you link to wrong.

    The fact you've linked to a paper doesn't mean you understand it and more than once you've made claims about some part of physics which are not true. Correcting your misunderstanding of science is not the same as denouncing that part of science. I know it's very hard to you to accept but your knowledge isn't the be all and end all of science.
  20. glaucon tending tangentially Registered Senior Member


    You confuse me. At times, you're both eloquent and insightful. At other times, you're as obtuse and insane as a theist. I would suggest that your greatest problem (with respect to engaging in discussion) is that you seem incapable of actually responding to the criticism of others. You either flatly ignore, or compose a strawman. You need to calm down and actually read what others say. More often than not, you seem to be more concerned with convincing others that you are right, as opposed to actually engaging others in discussion. There's a word for this type of behaviour: proselytizing.
  21. Bishadi Banned Banned


    constructive criticism!
  22. DiamondHearts Registered Senior Member

    I'm sorry to put this so plainly but your posts are a bunch of incoherent rambling. Your posts are impossible to read and never backed by any type of evidence.
  23. Bishadi Banned Banned

    can you define that statement with an example of a thread i opened; that was based on news, then items from pubs (with links) and the experimental evidence provided by the scientist who wrote the pubs?

    from the cytoskeleton, polaritonics, solitons, excitons, and all the threads i have opened; please show me one of them that did not have evidence?

    please; i would like the education on this!

Share This Page