Strong and weak Atheism.

Please read OP first. Where do you stand on the Scale?


  • Total voters
    8
KK. I can see i have pissed off some people. Tell me what ur opinions are. How do u define the term. How would u explain them. I am putting out my view and I want to know urs. I have only been a atheist for a fortnight, my philosophy is upside down and I am trying to reorganize and understand things. Help me out.

For one thing it's obvious you do a lot of texting. Might help if you were a little more deliberate in your writing. When you say you've only been an atheist for a couple of months. I have trouble with that. I was an atheist long before I was willing to acknowledge it. In grade school I wouldn't admit to it because I didn't want to be the only one that was different and I didn't really understand what I was feeling at the time. In high school atheist didn't get a lot of dates. Later I just didn't want to argue with my friends. I think the main problem was I just never met any atheist that I could talk to, to help clarify what it means to be an atheist, agnostic or theist. I started browsing science forums a few years ago, where there are many atheist and it wasn't long that I soon realized I've been an atheist in denial most of my life. So please tell us your story, so it will be easier for us to understand your background in relationship to what you are saying.
 
I started browsing science forums a few years ago, where there are many atheist and it wasn't long that I soon realized I've been an atheist in denial most of my life. So please tell us your story, so it will be easier for us to understand your background in relationship to what you are saying.

KJK, it sounds like you came to a long slow realization, whereas aaqucnaona may be having one of those brain-defragging moments?
Those are when you realize the main mental constructs of your life no longer make any sense and they suddenly fall apart on you, or you have some huge insight...and you suddenly have to refile half the crap in your brain.
Can be discombobulating.
 
KJK, it sounds like you came to a long slow realization, whereas aaqucnaona may be having one of those brain-defragging moments?
Those are when you realize the main mental constructs of your life no longer make any sense and they suddenly fall apart on you, or you have some huge insight...and you suddenly have to refile half the crap in your brain.
Can be discombobulating.

Anytime someone says god talks to them I know they are crazy or they are liars. I usually go with the latter, and at that moment I lose interest in talking to them. After all what's the point of talking to a liar. As a matter of fact if you do continue talking to them, you give them hope that they can troll you.:D
 
Anytime someone says god talks to them I know they are crazy

Hey...it's not like I've ever deniedthat :p.

I have come to think of the specific voice that tells me...erm...things...as a higher form of myself. Kind of the once and future me.

But what the h3ll do I know for certain about this stuff?
Believe what you want, or not. Whatever makes your boat float.
 
Hey...it's not like I've ever deniedthat :p.

I have come to think of the specific voice that tells me...erm...things...as a higher form of myself. Kind of the once and future me.

But what the h3ll do I know for certain about this stuff?
Believe what you want, or not. Whatever makes your boat float.

Well if you have other personalities, why have you never introduced them?
 
I am incited to write this coz yesterday, a discussion on what is atheism went from discussing Sam's panties to me tearing my hair out over her inability to distinguish strong and weak atheism...

It's a rather futile exercise to think that a poll will magically make someone understand weak and strong atheism. This very same topic cyclically repeats itself on sciforums and the best outcome to date is the OP making him/her-self feel better.

If you actually want to help people's understanding then you have to understand what your up against. Some people genuinely cannot comprehend the difference between "I don't believe X is true" and "I believe X is false". Other people, such as SAM, understand the difference very well and will purposely play dumb in an effort to invalidate the difference (which if successful would place you within a common definition of atheism which you would not identify with... and in someone like SAM's mind, that's one step closer to crushing atheism and sucking you into theism).

My suggestion would be an initiative to slightly alter the definition of atheism so it correctly applies to all atheists. A suggested definition could be:

Atheist - Someone who does not accept the statement "God exists" as being true.

I think it would correctly encompass what are presently weak atheists, strong atheists, and anything in between.
 
If you actually want to help people's understanding then you have to understand what your up against. Some people genuinely cannot comprehend the difference between "I don't believe X is true" and "I believe X is false".

Could that be because... there isn't any difference?

There certainly is a difference between - a) believing in not-x, and b) not believing in x.

It's possible to imagine b) applying to somebody who has never heard of x and has no beliefs about it one way or the other. Or perhaps in b) we are talking about something like a stone that doesn't have beliefs, hence the stone doesn't believe in x (or in anything else).

But when a person actually comes out and says "I don't believe that x is true", they seem to be indicating that they do possess beliefs, have heard of x and reject its truth. And that seems to be very close to saying that they believe x is false. (Assuming that we accept two-valued logic etc.)
 
Could that be because... there isn't any difference?

You tell me. One is acceptance and one is rejection. Do human beings process these identically? If they don't then there is a difference.

There certainly is a difference between - a) believing in not-x, and b) not believing in x.

It's possible to imagine b) applying to somebody who has never heard of x and has no beliefs about it one way or the other. Or perhaps in b) we are talking about something like a stone that doesn't have beliefs, hence the stone doesn't believe in x (or in anything else).

But when a person actually comes out and says "I don't believe that x is true", they seem to be indicating that they do possess beliefs, have heard of x and reject its truth. And that seems to be very close to saying that they believe x is false. (Assuming that we accept two-valued logic etc.)

Think about the situation where evidence is absent or inconclusive. It's not uncommon for people to reject ideas but not accept that they are conclusively false.
 
Theism is an ontological position.... belief in one or more gods.
Atheism is, in its broadest sense, a lack of this belief.
There is a tendency to distinguish between those who merely lack belief (weak atheists) from those who also believe god does not exist (strong atheists) - but both are atheists.
Others see atheism as requiring some rejection of belief... i.e. to have been presented with and understand to some degree the idea/concept of God and to have then rejected it - which would separate them from those who have not, such as toddlers. This distinction is between explicit atheism and implicit atheism.

So yes, there's a wide variety of atheisms, but at their core they all just lack belief in god(s), and the variation is not really in the strength of their (a)theism (which many see as digital: you either are or you are not) but in the various other philosophies they have.


Agnosticism, however, is an epistemological position... whether you think God is knowable or not, whether you have personal knowledge or not.

It is quite often that the same thought process that leads to Agnosticism also leads to Atheism... and so you get Agnostic Atheists... and due to their agnosticism they tend to be "weak" atheists. But they are agnostic. And they are atheist.

There are also some who are agnostic (i.e. hold God to be unknowable) and argue that that is sufficient for God to be considered non-existent - and these would be agnostic atheists but "strong" atheists: they believe god does not exist, precisely because they hold any such god is unknowable.

There are likewise some agnostic theists - people who believe but also accept that God is unknowable. Yet they believe, and they believe 100% that God exists.

So I hope you can see that by combining both epistemological and ontological issues on the same axis leads to confusion and inaccuracy.

It's like combining engine-power and colour on the same axis to describe a car.

Excellent post. Never has any single post cleared up the mess in my mind better than you have. Take a bow and a hat [and wear em both!]. Ok. Now, if we can still chart ourselves, somewhat like : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inglehart_Values_Map.svg

Can we do it in like beilief and non belief of god on one axis and whether he is knowable on the other axis?
 
@ chimpkin & KillJoyKlown
He's just talking to himself and everyone does it all the time, its the primary way of making decisions or non reflective thinking. It isnt a voice in ur head or a personality in the normal sense. I wonder which one of the 3 [talking 2 1self, voice in head i.e. halucination, split personality] it is when religious people claim to have a revelation?
 
Last edited:
For one thing it's obvious you do a lot of texting. Might help if you were a little more deliberate in your writing.

Yes, I do text some, but yes, atleast my OPs Must be much more well written. I think my best written post was on my journey to atheism and that was completely spontaneous! Can u give me some links on planning and writting a post?
 
It isnt a voice in ur head or a personality in the normal sense.
That's what my therapist thinks too...I'm not nutty enough to have Dissociative Identity Disorder.
Now explain why I have several of them and they argue...:rolleyes:
At least the ones that yelled at me incoherently shut up a while back...those would hit me and I'd jump painfully and wince.
I wonder which one of the 3 [talking 2 1self, voice in head i.e. halucination, split personality] it is when religious people claim to have a revelation?
I dunno, what's their diagnosis?:D
 
Now explain why I have several of them and they argue At least the ones that yelled at me incoherently shut up a while back...those would hit me and I'd jump painfully and wince.

Sweet Zombie jesus on a stick! U really are over the edge. Someone take him away! He's gonna eat me! Help! Nooo........


I dunno, what's their diagnosis?:D

Idk, but its a hell lot better than urs.

Lols, I wonder if they ever consider if the voices are actually real.
 
Back
Top