That's what makes it convincing to me. For one thing it is a news video, and surely it can be compared with the original for see if it was photoshopped. Also there is a weirdness aspect to it that suggests it is real. Cuz if someone was goin to CGI something they would certainly create an image of something familiarly monstrous like an alien grey or a ghost or whatever. THIS image defies anything we can identify. Visually it doesn't even make sense. Yet there it is in all of it's raw unexplainable glory. That's what makes it more convincing imo..
"That's what makes it more convincing imo"
As Sarkus pointed out in relation to youtube video evidence:
"Which strictly still is evidence... just not necessarily evidence that I consider to rationally point to the existence of the supposed "monster" (other than the "weird" mundane, such as the sloth).
Bear in mind that evidence is evidence, and it should not be confused with the interpretation of that evidence.
I.e. the youtube videos are evidence - even if evidence merely of someone's CGI work."
Mr. Magical Realist, just because you are easily convinced by "youtube 'evidence' ", does not mean that anyone or everyone else should accept, let alone,adopt those same convictions.
By the way, pictures are "photoshopped", it takes more advanced Video Editing/Creation software to manipulate video.
Last edited: