SpuriousMonkey's Forum
- Thread starter shorty_37
- Start date
- Status
Because the thread was about Spurious informing the members of his forum that he would prefer you not be invited to join.
Because it was you who, in Spurious's opinion, showed nothing but negativity. Perhaps the others with negative attitudes showed other redeeming traits? Regardless, it was simply Spurious expressing his opinion of you garnered from your reaction to his experiment. Not that you were the intended test subject, rather that you showed a great deal of rancor towards anyone would suggest polite and amicable behavior towards your enemy.
It wasn't. It had nothing to do with you.
Your rancor was simply noted as distasteful and unwelcome.
Maybe because Spurious didn't think of it until he did? Can't perform an experiment if it has not occurred to you to do so, can you?
Bells
Staff member
You read the thread, surely you understood the first post in it, didn't you? The opening post was to comment on your invitation to his forum after you had posted a thread about it here. I would assume that is the reason behind calling the thread shorty.
The thread clearly states that it was created after his so called experiment, which was not really about you but about himself. You appear to have come into it at the end when the sockpuppet realised that sandy was not a bad person after all and when he came to his realisation that you were a negative influence after he read your posts and he stated quite plainly that he found your intelligence to be lacking. It is also quite clear from what he said (and he states it in his forum) that he created a sockpuppet to run an experiment with sciforums (not you) and during his experiment, he came to the realisation that you were part of the problem that sciforums had been having. He stated this after he was questioned by another member.
As far as that thread is concerned, there is nothing of what you are accusing Sam of. Nowhere does it say in that thread that everyone knew about what he was doing. I didn't. Sam said she only found out afterwards when he told her that with his sockpuppet he found that sandy was not as bad as he had originally thought. So your accusation of any indiscretion on Sam's behalf is, well, moot. You have no proof. And reading through that thread, it is obvious it was not some fiendish plan to get you. It wasn't even about you. You were basically a side product of the discussion.
Good grief, how many times must this be repeated to you?
Nobody is 'hammering' Shorty. Just trying to explain to her that she is mistaken in her accusations.
It doesn't seem to be working though.
It doesn't seem to be working though.
Bells
Staff member
OK, fair enough I guess. I just hate to see women fighting. Unless they're in jello or syrup or mud or marmalade or something. Just to cushion the impacts, like. My primary concern is always their health. They should always be very healthy.
Read through the diatribe like the rest of us had to Mr!
Noooo, I don't wanna! I want answers right now! I want 'em! I want 'em! I want 'em! *stomps feet angrily, throws toy, stomps off to room and slams door
I'll bet all the mods are mulling that last post over.
"Can we get rid of him now? Look what he said about women!"
"Lemme delete his post, that'll fix him!"
"Maybe we should give him another chance."
"Look, buy me a ticket to Philly and I promise you after a kick in the ball that he'll never make light of something so serious again."
I "meh" at you all.
"Can we get rid of him now? Look what he said about women!"
"Lemme delete his post, that'll fix him!"
"Maybe we should give him another chance."
"Look, buy me a ticket to Philly and I promise you after a kick in the ball that he'll never make light of something so serious again."
I "meh" at you all.
Since Spurious thinks I was part of the problem in Sci forums I just came across
a post by Sandy...well before i got here.
"Originally posted by Sandy"
If you look back to the beginning since I first came here, I did not insult anyone. I never personally attacked anyone. I was CRUCIFIED by attacks since day one--mostly from spuriousmonkey and his friends.
The sciwiki was fun for awhile. Then spur and his friends started calling me "whore of Jesus" and other VILE names. I finally fought back so now HE reports Me.
He hates me. I understand that. But the personal attacks need to stop. From him and everyone else.
a post by Sandy...well before i got here.
"Originally posted by Sandy"
If you look back to the beginning since I first came here, I did not insult anyone. I never personally attacked anyone. I was CRUCIFIED by attacks since day one--mostly from spuriousmonkey and his friends.
The sciwiki was fun for awhile. Then spur and his friends started calling me "whore of Jesus" and other VILE names. I finally fought back so now HE reports Me.
He hates me. I understand that. But the personal attacks need to stop. From him and everyone else.
Shorty,
Yes. Spurious was once one of her greatest detractors. He then began to question his behavior. He carried this questioning so far as to perform an experiment as to whether Sandy might not be as horrible as everyone thought.
Thus, you begin to see that you were not the root of his experiment. It was actually an exercise in self-awareness.
Yes. Spurious was once one of her greatest detractors. He then began to question his behavior. He carried this questioning so far as to perform an experiment as to whether Sandy might not be as horrible as everyone thought.
Thus, you begin to see that you were not the root of his experiment. It was actually an exercise in self-awareness.
Moderator message:
1. Sockpuppets
sockpuppets are discouraged on sciforums. sockpuppets created for the specific purpose of "stalking" other members will be immediately banned whenever they are discovered.
If any member is aware of any sock puppets set up for such purposes, or of any sock puppets created by previously-banned users, please send a PM to any of the administrators or supermoderators, and those people will be banned.
2. Complaints or issues carried over from other forums.
Please do not post complaints about other forums on sciforums. The administrators of sciforums have no power to moderate other internet forums (a fact which should be obvious). Any issues with other forums should be raised there, not here.
Having said that, sciforums administrators do appreciate being informed if other forums are being used as platforms from which to organise and initiate attacks on sciforums members, moderators or administrators. Please send us a PM if you know of such activities.
Thread closed.
1. Sockpuppets
sockpuppets are discouraged on sciforums. sockpuppets created for the specific purpose of "stalking" other members will be immediately banned whenever they are discovered.
If any member is aware of any sock puppets set up for such purposes, or of any sock puppets created by previously-banned users, please send a PM to any of the administrators or supermoderators, and those people will be banned.
2. Complaints or issues carried over from other forums.
Please do not post complaints about other forums on sciforums. The administrators of sciforums have no power to moderate other internet forums (a fact which should be obvious). Any issues with other forums should be raised there, not here.
Having said that, sciforums administrators do appreciate being informed if other forums are being used as platforms from which to organise and initiate attacks on sciforums members, moderators or administrators. Please send us a PM if you know of such activities.
Thread closed.
- Status