spuriousmonkey

O

Oniw17

ascetic, sage, diogenes, bum?
Valued Senior Member
Our top member hasn't posted in 5 days. Is this in protest of Lou's ban?
 
Not really...

It was just a sudden outphlumph-ing of bitching, which was so vituperative as to seem a lot longer than it actually was.

Of course, he could be dead.
 
perhaps. I don't know. It seems like he had it out for Sandy. I mean, fair enough---she does have kind of a warped world view, but is she any worse that her liberal counterparts who float around this forum?
 
BenTheMan said:
perhaps. I don't know. It seems like he had it out for Sandy. I mean, fair enough---she does have kind of a warped world view, but is she any worse that her liberal counterparts who float around this forum?
Click to expand...

yes much worse!
 
BenTheMan said:
perhaps. I don't know. It seems like he had it out for Sandy. I mean, fair enough---she does have kind of a warped world view, but is she any worse that her liberal counterparts who float around this forum?
Click to expand...
In a sense, no.

What is one to think, however, of someone who comes in talking about their ultra-fabalicious life, with private planes and Italian hot rods, and that they look like a supermodel, only better ?

And then to top it off, evangelical speechifications, & preachifications, oh, my !
Sorry, but those people are just as dangerous as the "mullah-maniacs" !

Why, if all my bile wasn't occupied detesting darksidZzzzz, I might give her a bit of the old #$@&*%!!! myself !

Or it could be that I'm just too lazy to...
:sleep:
 
People are allowed to post shit like this, and then they jump on Sandy? This is utter hypocricy.
 
BenTheMan said:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1410805&postcount=4
Better than this?
Click to expand...
Well, now... I can't say as I want to be drawn into being some sort of legalese-type advocate for the man, 'cos it don't pay nothin', I'm not mind-reader, and as I said, I am lazy.

I must admit, that was nasty.
Still... sarcasm is best when biting.
If that had been a tidbit out of an old gendanken post, people would be calling it part of the "Golden Age" of this place.


BenTheMan said:
People are allowed to post shit like this, and then they jump on Sandy? This is utter hypocricy.
Click to expand...
Perhaps.
As I will not tire of saying for some indefinite period, we got us a whim-based system of moderation in these here environs.
 
Killjoy said:
As I will not tire of saying for some indefinite period, we got us a whim-based system of moderation in these here environs.
Click to expand...

You know, there was something written in the terms at the time you registered to this site, and you agreed to it by registering.

Just being the devil's advocate at the moment. ;)
 
Well, now... I can't say as I want to be drawn into being some sort of legalese-type advocate for the man, 'cos it don't pay nothin', I'm not mind-reader, and as I said, I am lazy.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. I just want to point out that the conservative hacks have a bit more trouble than the liberal hacks.

Just sayin...
 
I wrote a scientific article, in honor of spurious, on how to fix sciforums. I'm going to go put him in the acknowledgements.
 
BenTheMan said:
perhaps. I don't know. It seems like he had it out for Sandy. I mean, fair enough---she does have kind of a warped world view, but is she any worse that her liberal counterparts who float around this forum?
Click to expand...

Ya think? He followed me around the board trolling/attacking everything I said. He trashed my SciWiki profile with vile, disgusting, degrading attacks. When I finally fought back and said something *I* was banned from SciWiki. I think he has come back as Shorty. "She's" just as mean-spirited and personal attacking as he is.:(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top