Spritual Terms defined?

Dywyddyr said:
Pure unadulterated nonsense.
You persist in claiming that your wishful thinking is logic yet your only recourse when called on it is to exhort respondents to "apply logic with equanimity" - if you actually had any logic you'd be able to lay it out step by step.


Absolute crap.
Off to the ignore list for you: you're not not only illogical but tedious with it.
Click to expand...
Take your own stand. It is not necessary all are entitled to get all.
 
Dywyddyr said:
Pure unadulterated nonsense.
You persist in claiming that your wishful thinking is logic yet your only recourse when called on it is to exhort respondents to "apply logic with equanimity" - if you actually had any logic you'd be able to lay it out step by step.


Absolute crap.
Off to the ignore list for you: you're not not only illogical but tedious with it.
Click to expand...

This was my response to the crap put forward to my post
Either the battery is running down or some of the logic gates have been welded shut

Goodnight Gracie

:)

Thought of another - his lap top has run away to a Himalayan cave and is trying to make it on its own :)

:)
 
KUMAR5 said:
Then, open it. You can not discuss more on seed, you can simply better understand it by growing it.
Click to expand...
Hi There KUMAR5.
You need to just learn more before you think you have it all worked and the end of your labour is in site and miss that to learn more one could do well listen to those who present some point which although the first response may be but to dismiss the gift you have been offered such that you move perhaps too quickly to re run your idea thus sidestepping counsel and by so doing miss something that may be indeed would be beneficial to understand as to how you can reconcile the opinions you have gathered and knowing that opinions can masquerade as beliefs which we tend to treat as facts upon which we can lay our foundation but in truth their beliefs do often hide the reality that one is trying to find and so one must treat any belief as opinion perhaps subject to alteration or ammendement and even so there is still not particular assurance or guarantee that we have discovered any ultimate truth which when you consider what set you upon your quest it may have been truth that you sort the truth that you did suspect was hidden from others but now shows itself to you and you become happy that you have perhaps found the truth and unfortunately will be happily content in your passive ignorance of the universe.
Alex
 
Last edited:
Xelasnave.1947 said:
Hi There KUMAR5.
You need to just learn more before you think you have it all worked and the end at to learn more is to listenbto those who present some point which although the first response may but to dismiss the gift you have bed n give such that you move perhaps too quickly to re run your idea with sidestepping counsel and by so doing miss something that may be indeed would be beneficial to understand how you can reconcile opinions you have gathered and knowing that opinions can masquerade as beliefs which we tend to treat as facts upon which we can lay our foundation but in truth their beliefs do often hide the reality that one is trying to find and so one must treat any belief as opinion perhaps subject to alteration or ammendement and even so there is still not particular assurance or guarantee that we have discovered any ultimate truth which when you consider what set you upon your quest it may have been truth that you sort thectruth you did suspect was hidden from others but now shows itself to you and you happy that you have perhaps found the truth will be happily content in your passive ignorance of the universe.
Alex
Click to expand...
Thanks. There is no limit of arguments due to non absolutism or MOVs factor. One need to be absolute and final to end it. But not anticipated. Eg. To an Alphanso mango tree, one can say it a plant, a tree, a green tree, a shaddy tree, a big tree, a fruit tree, a mango tree, a person with less vision or in dim light a ghost or a small mountain. Upto here, no one is telling lie but said partly or missensed. Someone with selfish interest, can tell lie, it is Ashok tree to misguide others to eat all mango himself. Hence unless it is defined as an Alphanso tree to known person, no one can fully understand it. Aurguments can be there in all former interpretations but should not be in later case. I mostly gave Alphanso like interpretaions but if anyone has any true unclarity, he can ask specifically and dedicately, not hypnotised. Good day.
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
happily content in your passive ignorance of the universe.
Click to expand...
Pleeeeaaaaasssseeee your post contains so many words and many of them more than two syllables. Given K5 history you are not expecting
"I say ol chap I do see what you mean and I will take more care and consideration in composing my reply. Thank you kind sir. Toodle pip"
More like
You should look at the sun for guidance as nature give logical sunlight to nature as the night falls

Sorry that does not do justice to his mangled post

The post remind me of the Japanese electronic construction manuals only worse

Plans for a nuclear submarine translated into English from Javanese through Egyptian and finally Irish who will build it

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Pleeeeaaaaasssseeee your post contains so many words and many of them more than two syllables. Given K5 history you are not expecting
"I say ol chap I do see what you mean and I will take more care and consideration in composing my reply. Thank you kind sir. Toodle pip"
More like
You should look at the sun for guidance as nature give logical sunlight to nature as the night falls

Sorry that does not do justice to his mangled post

The post remind me of the Japanese electronic construction manuals only worse

Plans for a nuclear submarine translated into English from Javanese through Egyptian and finally Irish who will build it

:)
Click to expand...

I was reading the bible backwards.
Alex
 
KUMAR5 said:
Thanks. There is no limit of arguments due to non absolutism or MOVs factor. One need to be absolute and final to end it. But not anticipated. Eg. To an Alphanso mango tree, one can say it a plant, a tree, a green tree, a shaddy tree, a big tree, a fruit tree, a mango tree, a person with less vision or in dim light a ghost or a small mountain. Upto here, no one is telling lie but said partly or missensed. Someone with selfish interest, can tell lie, it is Ashok tree to misguide others to eat all mango himself. Hence unless it is defined as an Alphanso tree to known person, no one can fully understand it. Aurguments can be there in all former interpretations but should not be in later case. I mostly gave Alphanso like interpretaions but if anyone has any true unclarity, he can ask specifically and dedicately, not hypnotised. Good day.
Click to expand...
Yes and I must say there is little that you present that I would wish to disagree upon possibly at the risk of not first recognising where we tend to meet even though that is undiscernable but perhaps upon the areas of hidden interest and more possibly beyond the gambit of each of our respective replies but although a hoped for consensus is only perhaps illusionary we can proceed happily relying upon our mutual assumption that each of us understand the other.
Alex
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
Yes and I must say there is little that you present that I would wish to disagree upon possibly at the risk of not first recognising where we tend to meet even though that is undiscernable but perhaps upon the areas of hidden interest and more possibly beyond the gambit of each of our respective replies but although a hoped for consensus is only perhaps illusionary we can proceed happily relying upon our mutual assumption that each of us understand the other.
Alex
Click to expand...
Yes. Simply, we need to attune us to the level of what we intend to discuss. Either to basic level or to intermediate or to gross level. To absolute truth, partial truth, rational or selfish interest levels. To universal or specific level. Anyone may follow Prime God (so also get prime) other secondary god(incarnation, god's son, prophet etc. so also get secondaries/gross). It may not be wrong following but simply a level difference. Someone may support creation/peace, other destruction/violence (both natural) so not odd in nature. Hence variations in faiths can be due to such level differences, regional environmental & cultural variations, if not selfish interest based.
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
Yes and I must say there is little that you present that I would wish to disagree upon possibly at the risk of not first recognising where we tend to meet even though that is undiscernable but perhaps upon the areas of hidden interest and more possibly beyond the gambit of each of our respective replies but although a hoped for consensus is only perhaps illusionary we can proceed happily relying upon our mutual assumption that each of us understand the other.
Alex
Click to expand...
Are you sure you have recovered?
You don't need to call your friend for more assistance?
Or have you just forgotten one of your medications?
Would you like if I could contact Charlie for you?
Since Charlie operates in the mystical energy world for healing, do you think there is a mystical energy world of diseasing?
Any chance you have caught the K5 bug?
Blink twice if you are being forced to post nonsense?

:)
 
Energy & Matter are two basic substances for all things & beings--so should have their value in everything & being. We should not ignore energy eventough matter has mass and more apparent.
 
KUMAR5 said:
Energy & Matter are two basic substances for all things & beings--so should have their value in everything & being. We should not ignore energy eventough matter has mass and more apparent.
Click to expand...
It's to easy to point out energy is NOT a substance

If you have evidence energy is a substance please provide a link to such information

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
It's to easy to point out energy is NOT a substance

If you have evidence energy is a substance please provide a link to such information

:)
Click to expand...
Just take it in common language not in technical language. Btw, if it is not a substance, what energy is in technical physics language? So to avoid futher thechnical mistake. Thanks.
 
Michael 345 said:
Are you sure you have recovered?
You don't need to call your friend for more assistance?
Or have you just forgotten one of your medications?
Would you like if I could contact Charlie for you?
Since Charlie operates in the mystical energy world for healing, do you think there is a mystical energy world of diseasing?
Any chance you have caught the K5 bug?
Blink twice if you are being forced to post nonsense?

:)
Click to expand...
I practicing for a consulting gig with the government.
Alex
 
KUMAR5 said:
Just take it in common language not in technical language. Btw, if it is not a substance, what energy is in technical physics language? So to avoid futher thechnical mistake. Thanks.
Click to expand...
This is a science forum for discussions, not a seven year old child class room to provide knowledge you should know
If you do not know you should as a adult at least know enough to be able to find out
So do some homework and look it up

:)
 
KUMAR5 said:
Yes. Simply, we need to attune us to the level of what we intend to discuss. Either to basic level or to intermediate or to gross level. To absolute truth, partial truth, rational or selfish interest levels. To universal or specific level. Anyone may follow Prime God (so also get prime) other secondary god(incarnation, god's son, prophet etc. so also get secondaries/gross). It may not be wrong following but simply a level difference. Someone may support creation/peace, other destruction/violence (both natural) so not odd in nature. Hence variations in faiths can be due to such level differences, regional environmental & cultural variations, if not selfish interest based.
Click to expand...
Take a sheet if paper and after seekinh calmness write down what you do not know taking particular care not write down anything you know or believe you know and so create another universe which strangely may be in contrast to your current one and thereby finding another path.
Alex
 
Xelasnave.1947 said:
Take a sheet if paper and after seekinh calmness write down what you do know taking particular care not write down anything you know and so crest another universe which strangely may be in contrast to your current one and thereby finding another path.
Alex
Click to expand...
:) Careful that almost made sense
Stay clear of post which make sense and that "lay down and tell me your troubles" is in the shoe box on the other foot

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Are you sure you have recovered?
You don't need to call your friend for more assistance?
Or have you just forgott
Click to expand...
My milk tastes funny.
Absolutely recovered that was yesterday today is today and tomorrow is tomorrow.
But tomorrow will be today and today will be yesterday.
Alex
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top