Nietzchefan:
Was she George Washington?
Asguard:
For one, only a pederast flirts with children.
For two, the only 'insults' in here are towards that stupid drunk posting apropos of nothing, and that other moron who made the mistake I wouldn't hit back because she has cancer.
If anything, the western world is obsessed with naked women-- read Chimpkin's mention of what kind of porn women actually find arousing.
The aphorism "Sex sells baby" only means cleavage and thighs because everyone knows a naked male is disgusting.
Another notch for this thread, actually: what better corroboration is there that modern Woman is obsessed with women than that what actually arouses them most is double dong?
She'd be labeled "trollop" instead.
Everything about you is a product of other people.
The savage wears only a cloth to cover his loins; an Eskimo wears muskox.
The pattern of human behavior is one of fear and desire to conform.
Sure, her behavior was limited but oppressed people are forever encouraged to curry favor with their masters.
So a fog of Female Mystique was blown around her to make her amenable to men-- she is required to express sexuality as coy, submissive, compassionate, caring, maternal.
Traits encouragd by patriarchy in obedience to it.
I get what you're seeing, but you're thinking too small.
What kind of man would even care about how smooth his nutsack was? It's a fucking sack to sack nuts.
That ad is for the metrosexual, a female male, he who was born in the bowels of an industry that opened itself up to WOMEN and GAY MEN.
"Corporate interests" is just another way of saying "Her Interests"-- that's my point.
All these trends follow curious patterns-- you can trace it all the way back to the 70's where women first lobbied and succeeded in sticking their sisters in everything.
The market, in other words, functions like a woman: it finds a hole in your soul, opens it wider, crawls in and manipulates you into doing its bidding while convincing you that you're still in control.
Sound like a mother?
They call it "market research" which bears a curious resemblance to your mother going through your drawers.
Signal:
You mean to tell me Lady Godiva didn't experience 'stress'? How about Mary Magdalene, Joan of Arc, Bodeucia, Lucille Ball, Regent Sophia, Lady Catherine, Queen Elizabeth, or any other woman that lived in this world before the last feminist movement?
All of these women would would have trouble recognizing Kate Moss or the Kardashians as even the same species.
Make that Paris Hilton, or this twit

How, heaven forfend, are teeth 'wooden' like?Dated a gorgeous women with wooden(like) teeth...much as I wanted to - could not get past it.
Was she George Washington?
Asguard:
Read close: step on my toes and you'll be paying with yours.actually I have read everything you have written, however as most of it is either insults or a weird attempt to flirt with Mac (I'm not sure which) lets go back to the very first post.
For one, only a pederast flirts with children.
For two, the only 'insults' in here are towards that stupid drunk posting apropos of nothing, and that other moron who made the mistake I wouldn't hit back because she has cancer.
This isn't 13th century France and modern man isn't Savonarola.Firstly it actually doesn't, try an experiment. Strip naked and walk down the street, make it Orleander's street and you will not only get arrested for "indecent exposure" you will also get comments about how the naked human body is "disgusting".
If anything, the western world is obsessed with naked women-- read Chimpkin's mention of what kind of porn women actually find arousing.
The aphorism "Sex sells baby" only means cleavage and thighs because everyone knows a naked male is disgusting.
Another notch for this thread, actually: what better corroboration is there that modern Woman is obsessed with women than that what actually arouses them most is double dong?
Actually, to a Victorian the term 'skank' probably meant churning butter.Secondly what is "Skanky" is determined by culture, for Victorian England you would be considered a skank and I say that without any knowledge of your normal dress standed.
She'd be labeled "trollop" instead.
Uhm, never?So then how exactly do we get back from a society where if a women isn't completely covered she is stoned to death or thrown in prison to a society where what to wear or not wear is up to the individual alone?
Everything about you is a product of other people.
The savage wears only a cloth to cover his loins; an Eskimo wears muskox.
The pattern of human behavior is one of fear and desire to conform.
I would disagree.Actually I would argue that the patriarchal control is in SUPPRESSING her sexuality rather than forcing her to express it
Sure, her behavior was limited but oppressed people are forever encouraged to curry favor with their masters.
So a fog of Female Mystique was blown around her to make her amenable to men-- she is required to express sexuality as coy, submissive, compassionate, caring, maternal.
Traits encouragd by patriarchy in obedience to it.
I get what you're seeing, but you're thinking too small.
What?. Women and men having sex used to be a form of spirituality which had to be suppressed for Constantine to use the catholic church to assume control. This was further suppressed throughout the middle ages and beyond climaxing in the witch trials for women seducing men to the devil.
That advert is for the purpose of tweaking women from men.s that feminism and patriarchal society? no its just corporate interests taking advantage
What kind of man would even care about how smooth his nutsack was? It's a fucking sack to sack nuts.
That ad is for the metrosexual, a female male, he who was born in the bowels of an industry that opened itself up to WOMEN and GAY MEN.
"Corporate interests" is just another way of saying "Her Interests"-- that's my point.
All these trends follow curious patterns-- you can trace it all the way back to the 70's where women first lobbied and succeeded in sticking their sisters in everything.
The market, in other words, functions like a woman: it finds a hole in your soul, opens it wider, crawls in and manipulates you into doing its bidding while convincing you that you're still in control.
Sound like a mother?
They call it "market research" which bears a curious resemblance to your mother going through your drawers.
Signal:
Oh, come come.The basic pattern is that people experience stress, and then they try to alleviate that stress.
You mean to tell me Lady Godiva didn't experience 'stress'? How about Mary Magdalene, Joan of Arc, Bodeucia, Lucille Ball, Regent Sophia, Lady Catherine, Queen Elizabeth, or any other woman that lived in this world before the last feminist movement?
All of these women would would have trouble recognizing Kate Moss or the Kardashians as even the same species.
Make that Paris Hilton, or this twit

Last edited: