Soft Mountains

1) I was just somewhat describing a radial tension crack, it is as you say.

2) For your scenario, the folding had to have occurred thousands of feet underground.

3) The sedimentary column looks like one Deluge caused it, not evidencing at all the uniformitarian scenario.

4) That reverse fault occurred after those sedimentary layers had set up, shortly after the Deluge.

5) The fracturing could have occurred after the bulk of the emplacement event.

6) Set up like quick lime, hard rock within weeks.
 
Hey IAC.

No matter what physical phenomena I present that, operating at the rates and modes we see today, shows the earth to be orders of magnitude older than ~6000 yrs, you will claim that it operated faster or in a different mode "back then".

Am I correct in this assumption?
 
The Global Flood Model does acknowledge non uniformitarian processes, most of them during the Deluge, and its aftermath, until the oceans had cooled and the volcanics of isostatic re-adjustment had calmed down at around 13 or 1400 B.C.
 
So, your basis for dating anything in the past is to make observations fit what the bible says, right?
 
Well, the geology I learned at college, particulary about stratigraphy, made no sense, with the uniformitarian thesis, but I went with the flow. Years later, I read The Genesis Flood by Henry Morris, and then the stratigraphy information which I had learned at college made sense to me.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
Well, the geology I learned at college, particulary about stratigraphy, made no sense, with the uniformitarian thesis, but I went with the flow. Years later, I read The Genesis Flood by Henry Morris, and then the stratigraphy information which I had learned at college made sense to me.
Click to expand...
Why then do you think that 99.99% of geologists, young and old, average and exceptional, think that the only way the stratigraphic record makes any sense at all is in the light of billions of years of slow (mostly) processes like tectonics and sediment deposition?

Everything I've seen in geology, biology, and physics makes no sense whatsoever without immense timespans.

Modern geology was formulated by people brought up on the bible stories, but who looked at the same things you do and saw that it made zero sense. You're really just pushing an agenda I think. Christians have a long history of fitting the "facts" to suit their power and control agenda.

Too bad.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
I suspect there are many closet young earth creationists, don' you?
Click to expand...
No, why? Professional ridicule maybe? If the evidence is there for everyone to see, and 99.99% of people say "Yep. Billions of years." then maybe you need to look closer at what they're looking at. There is no conspiracy of geologists, biologists, physicists, etc...
 
That's not true because they throw out date results which don't conform to their regimented uniformitarian/Darwinist timeline, such as intrinsic C14 in coal, oil, and diamonds, which proves that those were deposited thousands, not millions, of years ago.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
3) The sedimentary column looks like one Deluge caused it, not evidencing at all the uniformitarian scenario.
Click to expand...

Author's Note: the following repsonse has been edited as a test of how far the new moderators are likely to go in their tolerance of profane invective. I mean they are willing to tolerate IceAgeCivilisation's criminal distortion of the truth with ill considered, poorly expressed, adolescent (even pre-pubescent) fantasies. Why, therefore, should I be unable to say

Ice Age, you ****ing dip shit, if you have ever seen a sedimentary column, which I doubt, and still make those claims then you need your bloody eyes examined. Go look at the complexities of any 3-D seismic view of an oil reservoir and then try telling me with a straight face or a sane mind that it is the product of a single deluge. And that's just one reservoir out of tens of thousands. You're a blind f***ing nutter.
 
At current erosion rates, the ocean basins should have filled with sediments within 80 millions years, so those deltas are very young, thousands of years old. That minor detail aside, when and how do you supposed those deltaic sediments will supposedly pop up onto the continents to become part of the geologic column?
 
Or will the sea level have to drop many hundreds of feet for those deltaic fans to become under-dry-ground oil deposits? If so, then other deposits would have to come along to overlay them, for the pressure to form oil, so when and how would that supposedly happen. I guess the sea level would have to rise many hundreds of feet again, so/but how did oil deposits end up in the middle of continents, thousands of feet down, which often puts them at sea level?
 
IAC,

You do understand the concept of plate tectonics, uplift regions, and
subduction zones? And that over hundreds of millions of years, the geological landscape can be literally turned inside out?

I think this fully answers your last two posts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top