Sci-Fi's "Riverworld' Series" - Will It Suck?

goofyfish

Analog By Birth, Digital By Design
Valued Senior Member
The Sci-Fi Channel is going to be adapting Philip Jose Farmer's Riverworld novels, first as a two-hour pilot movie, then as a weekly one-hour series. The novels are long-time favorites of mine, and I'd love to see them done well. TV is often a good medium for sci-fi and fantasy adaptations, because despite the lower budgets, you can schedule them as two-parters or miniseries and flesh them out a little more.

I haven't heard a lot about the production of this series yet, but from what I have heard, I'm not going to get my hopes up.


The Good:
  • Executive produced by, and the pilot and some episodes directed by, Alex Proyas, the director of Dark City and The Crow. This material has a slightly different sensibility than his past work, but one never knows.
  • Sci-Fi seems to want to put their money where their mouth is; they did the Dune series and they have the rights to several other properties.
  • The novels and the concept lend themselves to a lot of possibilities if done by good writers.
The Bad:
  • No Sir Richard Francis Burton. His character is gone, replaced by (egads) an American shuttle astronaut named Jim Hale, played by the amazingly bland Brad Johnson. Why? Are American audiences unable to identify with an English explorer as the lead character? Is he just not interesting enough for a lead? (Puh-leeze.)
  • And, since there's no Burton, there's no Herman Goerring, either. The cast lists that I've seen list Alice Liddell and Sam Clemens (good!!!), as well as the alien, Monat; but not Joe Miller, King John or Pete Frigate.
  • Indications are that they want to, after establishing this world, have the series center around "the adventures that the team encounters while on 'an epic voyage up the river.'" OK, but is the mission as established in the books going to be the same? Is Burton . . . whoops, Hale :rolleyes: going to work his way up the River by committing suicide, or is that a not-ready-for-prime-time deal? Are we going to see the crew of the Not For Hire and its epic battles?
It would be better if it were produced on HBO or one of the other cable channels where they don't freak out about nudity and language (when the human race first awakens beside the River, everybody is naked, which is appropriate for a rebirth). I'm going to hope for the best, and expect the worst, and that way I might get a happy medium.


"You live your life. You die. You wake on the bank of a mile-wide river. You are
naked and 25 years old, but you remember dying, old and bed-ridden. Hundreds of
people, also dead, from every time of human history, awake around you.

You will never get sick, you will never age, and no child will ever be born to a
woman. The grail on your wrist will keep you fed, as long as a Grail Slaver doesn't
steal it and force you to work for your food.

All you brought from earth are your memories, your soul, and your sins.

You are a resurrectee on Resurrection Day, when every human who has ever lived
and died until 1983 has been reborn on the many million-mile banks of the Great River.

Welcome to the afterlife."




Peace.
 
How can it NOT Suck?

NO BURTON????????
What are they, MAD??????
After reading the Riverworld Books, my wife and I -- BOTH Americans, I might add -- did some research on Burton, even reading Rice's HUGE biography.
HECK, they should be making a biography of THIS guy.
But make Riverworld WITHOUT Burton is like making a movie on the American Revolution without George Washington and Thomas Jefferson!
I think once Americans got a handle on him, they'd be intriqued, too. The man just ROCKED!
And based on your OTHER two bad points, I've almost decided I don't WANT to see the pilot.
I'm still getting over FOX's HORRIBLE "Dr. Who" pilot.
Some things just SHOULDN'T be monkeyed with!

Jamie T.
Da Wolf
 
I've never read the books, but I can say that the only way for a movie/TV series/video game to even begin to do credit to a book you have to have te author on the scene. There were two big scenes that were taken out of "The Lord of the Rings" in the new movie. Generally the opposite path also sucks.
 
Riverworld or just another substitute?

I read the series about 30 years ago, and was intrigued.

One wonders if those who may/may not show us and others who have not read the series, Riverworld or just a one night stand? Only time will tell.
 
Can't you guys have faith

Cant you guys just have faith in scifi channel? What the frell am I saying?! They canceled Farscape, frell them.

No really. I have never heard of this before, riverworld i mean. Anybody care to give me some background information in the way of plot lines?
 
It sounds pretty cool, i checked out the synopsis of the first book of the saga/series on Amazon.com and it seems really interesting. I then bought the book :D
 
Great Synopsis of Riverworld books

This link will give you an idea of what each of the 5 books in the series are about.

http://www.geocities.com/simon750_1999/[/URL]

This series deserves the best possible transference from novel to screen in order to make it a winner, but knowing TV, the bottom line will take preference over a good screen treatment.
 
After reading what the books were about on amazon.com.... Im speechless. Ive never heard a better concept for a trilogy. This show is either going to be really bad or really good. There will be no inbetween.

Lets hope scifi channel does it right.... what am I talkin about?:bugeye: There going to screw you guys six ways from sunday.

P.S. I think Im going to buy them. Yes, I just did. on bn.com... hehe.
 
Back
Top