TheVat
Valued Senior Member
Yup. And there is the risk of the big spin where, if the spectacle maker is someone a faction agrees with, then there's the noxious branches of interpretation: either hagiography as striking a righteous blow for freedom, or the converse of dismissing them as crazy loners with an impulsivity disorder and Not True Whatevers. If said spectacle maker is perceived as the opposition, then they become another bogeyman used to conjure fear of that slice of the political spectrum.Do you remember the bit in Major League about how, "he was due"? Statistically speaking, it's inevitable that someone would eventually pop a conservative. And here, I'm not trying to justify any particular dimension of crazy, but, rather, what I mean is that whether it's hits on Democratic politicians or Asian and Asian-American women in spa parlors, at some point the victim of one of these spectacular murders was going to be a definitively conservative political figure.
Me either. I'm somewhat dealing with the shock of not being shocked.That it's Charlie Kirk, and not an office holder, is its own discussion; I haven't divined the dimensions of that part.