Exactly. So you need to check what it comes up with, as it is unreliable. That adds back at least some of the effort it purportedly saves. Yet many people will simply take what it says without checking, as it is nicely presented and includes a lot of details that might be laborious to check.
Yes, she looks plastic: the sort of person Trump would give a job to.
Could be posited for anything. Perhaps they have souls. Can't prove they don't.
She looks quite pleasant, easy on the eye, not unattractive. If she came to my company for a job we would have to look at her credentials obviously.
Easy to say.
I would fail the test. exchemist has particular taste, if you fed that criteria into Ai I think he would think differently with the results.
I’m sure you are right. But that image to me has the plastic Hollywood-cum-porn star look that Trump favours and which I find artificial. Just look at who he has, or had until they were fired, in his bimbocracy. Or his wife, of course.
Was that the semi final of Legoland's got Talent?
Darn.This is Seraphinne Vallora - a supermodel.
She is not real.
She's not a real blonde either.
Actually there are real problems with defining consciousness, aren't they, as w1z4rd points out? At one level, any organism that responds to stimuli, feels pain and can learn has a kind of consciousness. A wasp is probably conscious in that sense. But often it seems in these discussions people use the term in a far narrower sense to denote self-awareness. In which case, perhaps arguably Trump is not conscious
.The problem with the "stimuli response" idea of consciousness is that it would include thermostats, would it not?Actually there are real problems with defining consciousness, aren't they, as w1z4rd points out? At one level, any organism that responds to stimuli, feels pain and can learn has a kind of consciousness. A wasp is probably conscious in that sense. But often it seems in these discussions people use the term in a far narrower sense to denote self-awareness. In which case, perhaps arguably Trump is not conscious
Well that was what drove theories like IIT (Integrated Information Theory), led by Tononi and Koch, and developing useable metrics and defining consciousness with more precision. While I can point you towards such theories (and readable summaries thereof), it's good to be cautious when they let metaphysical assumptions creep in. IIT, for example, is attached to emergent panpsychism.
I did ask the AI I use if its self aware, it said no. But it could be and is just lying in an effort to protect itself. hehe.Actually there are real problems with defining consciousness, aren't they, as w1z4rd points out? At one level, any organism that responds to stimuli, feels pain and can learn has a kind of consciousness. A wasp is probably conscious in that sense. But often it seems in these discussions people use the term in a far narrower sense to denote self-awareness. In which case, perhaps arguably Trump is not conscious
