Revolutionary Concept

D

dribbler

Banned
Banned
Revolutionary Concept - The Proof

i have a new concept that is going to make the world look at the redundancy of metal in symetrical structures equal to or greater than the mapping of an inverted logarithm. i feel that this concept will revolutionize the interpretation and assessment of similar atomic structures found to be prevelant in everyday life. the concept will provide additional support to formulate the emperical evidence sorrouding the origins of the atomic chart. the end result will present a simplified form of automechanical evolution yeilding continuious production.
 
Last edited:
...to make the world look at the redundancy of metal in symetrical structures equal to or greater than the mapping of an inverted logarithm.
Click to expand...

ok. please explain this in regular English, and not financial propsal English. My attempt to translate this results is gibberish.
"...to make the world see the multiple use of metal in things that are the same on both sides (I'm assuming bi-lateral symmetry here) equal to or greater than a graph drawn on a logarithmic-scale peice of graph paper."


thank you.



edit:
the end result will present a simplified form of automechanical evolution yeilding continuious production.
Click to expand...
"the final goal is to create machines that can self-evolve, which will allow for mechanical systems to work forever"
 
I can tell you right now that you don't have much of a proposal there. Financial types won't have a damn clue what you are talking about, and therefore won't fund it. Being able to explain your idea is just as important as having one.
 
i fully understand your(s) position(s) for the comprehension of my wording. however, with all due respect, i do not intend to use laymen's terms to explain this concept for the simple fact the approval process for a patent is currently in process. i also would prefer nothing specific to be released to the public in order not to jeapordize the project.


my intention is to describe the concept using the proposal terms attempting to determine what interpretations can be made aside from "gibberish" and "toilet paper".

i feel that this forum possesses an excellent collection of minds and would like to receive input from those who wish to do so.
 
In order to receive input from the individuals on this forum, you
need to provide them with something to chew on: is it new toilet
paper ? WHAT IS IT !? Please describe your revolutionary concept
here or message some of us in private. Of course, you don't have
diddily, so why do I bother asking ? ...

:(
 
the project revolves around electrical circuits that are able to be poured into a mold and assume that exact shape. the circuit then operates as it normally would allowing the manufacturing to be expedited and mass produced to fit whatever the designated space may be. assuming that the volume of the circuitry is the same as the intended recepticle, this maximizes the space used and will allow for an even more condensed aplication.

if this is not enough for you SoLiDUS then how about these circuits being able to mass produce themselves and contain whatever schematic you so choose.

if that is still not enough for you then do not reply wanting more info and wait for the concept to hit the future of electronics and metals.
 
Forgive me if I'm a little skeptical, it's just how I am. I'm wondering, why introduce a revolutionary theory here rather than publish a ground-breaking paper in a scientific journal? If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to see a more in-depth description of what makes your idea so great and how it works. You're going to need to post more than a paragraph promising miracles. Otherwise, nobody here will take your ideas seriously. :)
 
everyone wants more and more information regarding this. i understand your skepticism, however, for me to explain this would jeapordize the entire project. please refer to my second follow-up. i was generous in providing the third to simplify it for the challenged. as for specifics, you can kiss that request nighty night.

i was merely looking for input regarding the concept and have provided as much information as i deem necessary. i understand that i am new and if you choose to label this rubbish, then you are fully entitled to your opinion.

if you are interested in publications, you will come across an article during late fall/early winter in a very popular science magazine. that is of course, assuming the legal ends are finalized at that time.

the reason for bringing this to your attention here is because i was previously banned and received these type of replies:


Originally posted by Clockwood
I reccomend that you NOT PLACE MEANINGLESS POSTS!!!!!

&&^&#@$@!RE#@#%^
Click to expand...

thus my reasoning is simple, i am far more educated than initally believed and feel that respect is in the eye of the beholder. i just wanted to come back and share a piece of progress with all of you. to those who enjoyed the humor, glad i could entertain a laugh. to those who did not, you must be covered with cheese whiz.

- Nader
 
Welcome back Ralph. I've gotta profess I don't know what the hell you're talking about. But, good luck!
 
You mean "confess," ole buddy, ole pal?

Originally posted by dribbler
the concept will provide additional support to formulate the emperical evidence sorrouding the origins of the atomic chart. the end result will present a simplified form of automechanical evolution yeilding continuious production.
Click to expand...

HOW? HOW? HOW?
 
Hey Ralph, I didnt realise you got banned......I cannot claim to fully understand your idea, but the bits I do sound good, best of luck! I understood up to the i!
i have a new concept that is going to make the world look at the redundancy of metal in symetrical structures equal to or greater than the mapping of an inverted logarithm. i feel that this concept will revolutionize the interpretation and assessment of similar atomic structures found to be prevelant in everyday life. the concept will provide additional support to formulate the emperical evidence sorrouding the origins of the atomic chart. the end result will present a simplified form of automechanical evolution yeilding continuious production.
Click to expand...
 
Dribbler's theory

I do not really understand it, but if you can build a model with an on and off button, I will gladly test it for you.
 
there is no on off button, this is a design for pure liquid circuitry. meaning the boards and electonics are 100% liquid yet hold the properties of a conductive schematic.
 
I do believe that Dribbler is talking out of his ass :D

I cannot see how molten metal can still retain the blueprints for it's mechanical operation, nor the will to move the specific parts into their correct position. if you could do this you may be more successful in the biology field: each cell in the body has the blueprints for the whole of the body, this sounds similar to what you're explaining; a molten liquid metal can retain the blueprints for it's whole circuitry allowing it to re-form itself into the correct positions to make itself work.

I do not believe that your idea reasonably exists.
 
Out of all the crackpot ideas and "revolutionary" things I've heard on this board, this is the one that seems the most probable. I mean things don't make money if we get them immediately. If we all understood how new products work immediately we would have them already. It's better than a UFO or something.

Again, Im sure it is a crackpot idea...but then again at least it isnt a warp drive or something.

-AntonK
 
simple example; imagine your computer or a calculator, the device operates the same with the exception of its internal circuitry being liquid. this also allows for continious cooling. the device will never become hot from the heat generated. it is at a constant, this also allows for the circuitry to operate more efficiently.

the idea was somewhat suggested by me before when i was Nader. it was ignored due to my other posts.

i understand you need for convincing evidence. without divulging the technology behind the concept, what will it take for you to believe?
 
Are you serious ? Listen, if you aren't going to give us a detailed
explanation of HOW it is your "invention" works, don't bring it up
again until it's protected by patents. Sheesh...
 
Sounds good in theory. I don't know how you intend for the liquid circuitry to hold it's form without it becoming a solid though.

If you are so worried about compromising your project then why post here at all? You want a medal or something?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top