Research on the Hard Problem of Consciousness (Mind-Body Problem)

pouyam9

Registered Member
Does the existence of 8 billion working brains mean there are 8 billion different real players, or is there only one player, and this one player designed the human matrix to look like there are 8 billion decision makers?

Does the human face represent a real individual with free will and ability to choose, or what's happening behind the face, turning the human face into a hyper-realistic mask covered and painted by skin and hair with the ability to show emotion and feeling ?

What if Even the result of your interaction or search with AI and a computer or Internet is also programmed?this deep level of programming and attention to even small details!Nobody can believe their interaction with AI or a computer or Internet itself can be something programmed. programming inside a program to deepen the illusion of reality. If a reality becomes programmed, then every interaction in that system is programmed, no matter how complex and realistic it could function,such as the interaction of a human with AI. A programmed brain is using a programmed AI with predetermined results, but this interaction is so realistic and complex that consciousness can't understand it.

The deeper you go down the rabbit hole, the more you encounter Consciousness versus the programmed brain, with each person experiencing different levels of involvement. We experience the human matrix only as consciousness, either enjoying a coffee, or having a headache, or falling in love with somebody; it's all experienced only as consciousness, which means we only understand the matrix and not really the doer of any action.

The illusion in the matrix is to bring the consciousness to this conclusion, that somebody is doing it. It's like a programmed show with an illusory sense of control made for consciousness, which is nobody; consciousness is not somebody. The matrix is doing everything to make this feeling that someone is doing any action, and then any action can be claimed. That's how the universe is playing with its own consciousness, by making the illusion of choice and free will as thoughts.

The whole human ability for conversation and make words and sentences are designed in this matrix to deceive the consciousness to believe , something other than what is happening, no matter how good you talk, and how much of the truth you use in your conversation, the reality doesn't need any explanation as words to be understood, words are actually hiding the truth. No matter how close you talk about the truth.

Saying everything is consciousness does not mean anything, the world of religions and mystical paths are all play of words, and words and sentences are the main obstacles in your way to be conscious as consciousness, so no matter how they want to close you to the truth, still using words to occupy the brain, and cover the existing consciousness.

This paper presents an original theory on the nature of consciousness and free will, proposing that human life operates within a predetermined matrix where the illusion of free will is created through the interaction of consciousness with the nervous system, particularly through cerebrospinal fluid. The work explores physiological mechanisms behind this process and their implications for understanding religious practices, subjective experiences, and the fundamental nature of reality:

Research link:

 
Does the existence of 8 billion working brains mean there are 8 billion different real players, or is there only one player, and this one player designed the human matrix to look like there are 8 billion decision makers?
Like the brain in a jar thing? If we have no way of exploring it, then the reality we experience is reality.
 
Does the existence of 8 billion working brains mean there are 8 billion different real players, or is there only one player, and this one player designed the human matrix to look like there are 8 billion decision makers?

Does the human face represent a real individual with free will and ability to choose, or what's happening behind the face, turning the human face into a hyper-realistic mask covered and painted by skin and hair with the ability to show emotion and feeling ?

What if Even the result of your interaction or search with AI and a computer or Internet is also programmed?this deep level of programming and attention to even small details!Nobody can believe their interaction with AI or a computer or Internet itself can be something programmed. programming inside a program to deepen the illusion of reality. If a reality becomes programmed, then every interaction in that system is programmed, no matter how complex and realistic it could function,such as the interaction of a human with AI. A programmed brain is using a programmed AI with predetermined results, but this interaction is so realistic and complex that consciousness can't understand it.

The deeper you go down the rabbit hole, the more you encounter Consciousness versus the programmed brain, with each person experiencing different levels of involvement. We experience the human matrix only as consciousness, either enjoying a coffee, or having a headache, or falling in love with somebody; it's all experienced only as consciousness, which means we only understand the matrix and not really the doer of any action.

The illusion in the matrix is to bring the consciousness to this conclusion, that somebody is doing it. It's like a programmed show with an illusory sense of control made for consciousness, which is nobody; consciousness is not somebody. The matrix is doing everything to make this feeling that someone is doing any action, and then any action can be claimed. That's how the universe is playing with its own consciousness, by making the illusion of choice and free will as thoughts.

The whole human ability for conversation and make words and sentences are designed in this matrix to deceive the consciousness to believe , something other than what is happening, no matter how good you talk, and how much of the truth you use in your conversation, the reality doesn't need any explanation as words to be understood, words are actually hiding the truth. No matter how close you talk about the truth.

Saying everything is consciousness does not mean anything, the world of religions and mystical paths are all play of words, and words and sentences are the main obstacles in your way to be conscious as consciousness, so no matter how they want to close you to the truth, still using words to occupy the brain, and cover the existing consciousness.

This paper presents an original theory on the nature of consciousness and free will, proposing that human life operates within a predetermined matrix where the illusion of free will is created through the interaction of consciousness with the nervous system, particularly through cerebrospinal fluid. The work explores physiological mechanisms behind this process and their implications for understanding religious practices, subjective experiences, and the fundamental nature of reality:

Research link:

What makes you think consciousness is an entity, rather than simply an activity of the brain?
 
Does consciousness move and control the bodies, or are bodies programmed and moving by themselves and consciousness only understands it?
 
Does consciousness move and control the bodies, or are bodies programmed and moving by themselves and consciousness only understands it?
No. Step on a sharp object and your brain is initially not involved. Google, CNS, autonomic NS, reflexes.
Biology.
 
This paper presents an original theory on the nature of consciousness and free will, proposing that human life operates within a predetermined matrix where the illusion of free will is created through the interaction of consciousness with the nervous system, particularly through cerebrospinal fluid. The work explores physiological mechanisms behind this process and their implications for understanding religious practices, subjective experiences, and the fundamental nature of reality:
What's the title of the paper? Are you the author?

Has your paper been published in peer-reviewed journal?
 
I answered to your question in my paper, I can't repeat myself for every question. Read the paper , if you still have a question, then drop your question here!
Forum rules are that readers should mot be not required to go to other locations in order to carry on the discussion. You need to reply to my question here, on the forum.
 
What makes you think consciousness is an entity, rather than simply an activity of the brain?
I have to agree. How else should it "feel" to be an autonomous biological machine if not "consciousness". It doesn't really strike me as that deep of a question, let alone a "hard problem".
 
ABSTRACT: This paper argues that human life operates within a predetermined Matrix where free will is illusory. The Human Matrix theory propose that consciousness, as a non-physical phenomenon, interacts with the human nervous system through cerebrospinal fluid, with varying levels of access determining different states of awareness. This theory explains how universal consciousness becomes localized in individual humans through nervous system contractions, creating the false impression of separate selves with autonomous agency. The paper explores the physiological mechanisms behind this process, particularly focusing on cerebrospinal fluid circulation and nervous system dynamics, and their implications for understanding religious practices, subjective experiences, and the fundamental nature of reality.

So if going by that, just dualism. With spinal fluid replacing the pineal gland as the interaction zone, and a universal version of res cogitans instead of distinct "souls" applicable to each body. But there seem to be contradictions scattered in the text. Like this:

The human body is merely a medium for experiencing life, without any real individual or controller inside the brain.Therefore, in essence, on Earth, all humans are merely tools or playthings allowing consciousness, existing outside humans, to become aware of humans interacting with each other. Yet, no real controller or actor exists on Earth. Everything is like a preprogrammed computer game, continuously perceived by a consciousness (Bostrom, 2003). Due to the sensory nerves spread throughout the body and the automated functioning of the thought system, consciousness is given the impression that it is truly performing actions, making decisions, and managing the human body. But this is just an illusion created by the matrix, which, because of the overwhelming realism of this feeling, induces a sense of control. Consciousness is only observing this reality; it is not a decision-maker. The human brain is a programmed computer that works automatically, with or without consciousness (Libet,1985; Harris, 2012).

The above seems to playing with a passive witness consciousness that has no influence over anything. Where biological processes alone are outputting the body behavior. Not sure how "separate selves" could then be a mere "impression" in that context, when there's the physical identity maintained by stored memories in the brain and then that proposed immaterial "observer" that contributes absolutely nothing, and actually would be akin to a different identity, whether narrowly capable of its own personal characteristics or not.

If the body is autonomously determining its own actions according to its own acquired (and innate) preferences, then that's not a total elimination of freedom from the control of external agencies. That's just the secular world engaging in this anachronistic silliness of still grounding a contemporary definition of "free will" in the requirements of older religious beliefs.
_
 
Last edited:
I have to agree. How else should it "feel" to be an autonomous biological machine if not "consciousness". It doesn't really strike me as that deep of a question, let alone a "hard problem".
That also seems to be the view of people like Massimo Pigliucci and Peter Woit, who strike me as clear thinkers. They don’t think there is a “hard problem” at all. I suspect it is all a hangover from Cartesian dualism, which is ingrained in European thought.
 
pouyam9 said:
Research on the Hard Problem of Consciousness ...

Why is HPC even referenced in the title of this thread? A search indicates that HPC doesn't appear anywhere else in the post or the paper.

HPC pertains to the private manifestations correlated to neural activity (the phenomenal content of both introspective personal thoughts and exteroceptive sensations).

Whereas, instead, your paper seems to revolve around "consciousness" as conflated with intelligence, cognition, free-will, self, etc. Items that would alternatively be fine "subsisting in the dark" as AI and robots and matter in general dogmatically do. Whose information processing and outputted behavior and interactions do not require the luxury of internally manifesting as anything.
_
 
Back
Top