Remote viewer hones in on secret alien/military underground base

The word "boondoggle" familiar to you? This is the federal government we're talking about, right?
Are you kidding? Thruout the 80's during the Reagan administration's major cut backs of govt waste? They must've had a really good reason for keeping it going. And when the Soviet Union collapsed, no more reason!
 
Are you kidding? Thruout the 80's during the Reagan administration's major cut backs of govt waste? They must've had a really good reason for keeping it going. And when the Soviet Union collapsed, no more reason!
Reagan is the one who started the whole tax cut for the wealthy scheme and is the reason we now have mega corporations and billionaires screwing us over.
 
Are you kidding? Thruout the 80's during the Reagan administration's major cut backs of govt waste? They must've had a really good reason for keeping it going. And when the Soviet Union collapsed, no more reason!
You trying to say the government makes rational decisions? I doubt you would detect such.
 
[...] During one session, he is drawn away to the remote Mt Hayes in central Alaska and sees an underground facility there manned by humanoid aliens and normal humans. [...] What the hell is our military hiding?

Buried facilities in frozen regions are certainly not unknown, in general -- setting aside the specificity of alien humanoids. (Camp Century)
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

“We didn’t know what it was at first.” Buried beneath Arctic ice, a secretive underground military base emerges
https://thedebrief.org/we-didnt-kno...nd-military-base-emerges-in-new-radar-images/

EXCERPT: When it first appeared in their radar images, NASA scientist Chad Greene and his team of engineers weren’t sure what they were seeing. [...] This wasn’t the first time the U.S. military’s forgotten Cold War stronghold in Greenland had been detected during airborne surveys. In the past, aircraft using ground-penetrating radar have also detected signs of the hidden underground facility, albeit resembling little more than a small disturbance within the surrounding deformed layers of ice.
_
 
I was just going over a thread on Mick West's Metabunk site on the topic of remote viewing.(see? I am objective.) The excellent OP presents a compelling case for RV's reality and accuracy, citing many examples by remote viewers of astonishing results. Going thru the first page of the thread only, I found a very interesting back and forth on what is debunked and not debunked about RV. So far nobody has debunked any of the results except to claim that Ingo Swann's description of Jupiter as having rings was not so amazing given he came up with a lot of mistaken details about Jupiter having sand dunes and mountains ( it's a cloud planet.) There's also the typical sweeping dismissals of RV as never having been proven to be successful, when in fact the OP cites many case of such. IMO the open-minded PROs are winning over the skeptical CONs. See for yourself:

 
I was just going over a thread on Mick West's Metabunk site on the topic of remote viewing.(see? I am objective.)
haha-so.gif

The excellent OP presents a compelling case for RV's reality and accuracy, citing many examples by remote viewers of astonishing results.
As I suspected, you didn't bother reading the government reports of the actual experiments from the link I provided that showed RV was useless. Proof positive you are totally and unobjectively biased.
 
Last edited:
This thread, like most of Magical Realist's threads, is just uncritical fandom (for his part).

We can expect nothing better from MR.
 
Back
Top