Reality check: somewhere between 75% and 90% of those executed for witchcraft were women.Are you going to deny that men were tried and killed for being witches?
Persecution for witchcraft was a deeply misogynistic and patriarchal enterprise.
Reality check: somewhere between 75% and 90% of those executed for witchcraft were women.Are you going to deny that men were tried and killed for being witches?
My "verse" mean a whole text, while in your case you have united whatever you found it "sounds" good for your argument.
https://www.openbible.info/topics/eagleOpenBible said:Ezekiel 17:3
Say, Thus says the Lord God: A great eagle with great wings and long pinions, rich in plumage of many colors, came to Lebanon and took the top of the cedar.
Ezekiel 10:14
And every one had four faces: the first face was the face of the cherub, and the second face was a human face, and the third the face of a lion, and the fourth the face of an eagle.
You have to show that the reason those women were persecuted because they were women, and not perceived as witches.Persecution for witchcraft was a deeply misogynistic and patriarchal enterprise.
A pointless exercise, since you have confirmed that you do not take on board any information I present to you. Indeed, you typically just ignore it all.You have to show that the reason those women were persecuted because they were women, and not perceived as witches.
What did you discover in your extensive research on the topic? You appear to have missed virtually all of the scholarly studies and books that have given us insight into the history of witchcraft, the particular motivations of the accusers and of the prosecuting authorities etc.I dropped links where in some parts of the world men’s persecution of witchcraft outnumbered the women’s. Why was that if it was misogynistic?
Not mine:Your 20% of women victims of rape or attempt of rape have no records, such is only your personal conjecture, which is widely exaggerate, of course.
No, I really don't have to. You can ignore them, of course.Only the reported cases are validated, about the the rest, you must find the way to make them count with verifiable support.
Due to accumulated warning points, Jan is now banned from sciforums for a period of 2 weeks (14 days).
We need to flatten the perve...Doh! Just spotted one. Two actually. ^^
A misogynist sighting.
They’re among us...
That's nice.I love your joke.
Right..I didn't realized women are funny too.
You post as if you own a woman.Mine is so serious,
Maybe your jokes aren't funny.but I think she never laughs of my jokes because she never understand them
I would hope that is not the only reason you married her.I got married to her because others who know her told me she was a serious person, and they were right...
she never even smiles when we make love.
Our points of view are different, because you don't see what I can see, which is beyond your comprehension by your lack of seeing the whole horizon. For me the law against rape is not fully enforced but discriminate inmates. For example, most people, including you, accept rape of men in jail but fully reject rape of a woman in the street. To me, rape is rape and both situations are unacceptable. You don't care about men raped in jail, for you "such is part of their punishment", even when the court never stated it. You watch movies where such rape happen or are predicted, and for you there is not a single reaction, however, you watch a movie where a woman is raped and you feel compassion for her and turn against such an act.
See the failing with the current tendency in society? You are dedicated to defend "women rights" by over passing men's rights, and such is also unacceptable.
Yep. "Where did I say that?""I'm not sexist and/or misogynist. Show me where you get that idea."
You took it wrong as it was expected.Your make-believe is nothing new. If the point of these straw men is just to have something to flame, neither is that innovative, or useful, or whatever.
Try it this way: Do you acknowledge and affirm that women are human beings and have human rights? It's a straightforward question, and I encourage you to answer it forthrightly; there is utility in doing so, and being able to answer correctly.
The problem with tellng a woman what she thinks is both general and particular. Generally, you run a high probability of being wrong. In particular, you're giving over to misogynists in order to complain about women, and, really, that just isn't new.
(Hint: Parsing out "women's rights" in order to advocate particularly for men's rights is most assuredly nothing new.)
You took it wrong as it was expected.
I don't complaint about women, my complaint is the system giving preferences instead of equal treatment.
What are these preferences that women are receiving over men, as part of the ''system?''
Women won't leave Jan alone for some reason.
It's the ...they are mean to him type because of his misogynistic comments.Is that alone the
- ravage type or
- on their own type?
![]()
Arh the picking on me version got itIt's the ...they are mean to him type because of his misogynistic comments.
And who made that determination?Women and children get on the lifeboats first.
There is?There is pretty much already Universal Healthcare for women and children.
Hmmm..Just women, not so much however.
In what way?Being a pretty woman seems to be more advantageous than a pretty man.
Being an incel does that..Pluto has it rough.
If only he'd leave us alone..Women won't leave Jan alone for some reason.
You took it wrong as it was expected.
I don't complaint about women, my complaint is the system giving preferences instead of equal treatment.
Learn to read my humor and it will make your life a little easier.And who made that determination?
And then ask yourself why they (and you) chose to make that determination and in a way, comparison.
There is?
Where?
Hmmm..
In what way?
Being an incel does that..
If only he'd leave us alone..