Religion and women.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would say it's wrong for some to credit God for anything. I would say that it is correct that you like to argue every point, whether onpoint or not, in an effort to have something to do with your life, apparently. Right or wrong?
It’s a simple question.
Yes or no?
 
Do you have a problem with that?
Not at all. Why would I have a problem with you proving everyone's point about your sexism and misogyny when you usually couple that with ridiculous comments about women and their role in a marriage?

Her relentless false accusations
Which ones?

She's called you a misogynist and you have spent every single page since then living up to that moniker.

So, explain, what false accusations are you talking about?

Because she’s being emotional.
No, actually. She isn't.

Constantly accusing women of being emotional is sexist and is often used as a tool to diminish them and discredit and dismiss what they are saying.

Why are you being so sexist Jan?
You, me , James, and bilvon.
I can't speak for James and Billvon, but personally speaking, I do not disagree with Wegs. In fact, I am in full agreement with her in her assessment of you and your behaviour.

She keeps making false accusations
Where?

Believe what?
You tell me. You're the one who seems convinced that you and apparently others, can somehow set her straight...

No I haven’t.
You can’t use an accusation to prove the the same accusation. That’s all anyone has done.
Nothing I have said can be used to show I hate women.
But I'm not. I literally linked your sexist and misogynistic posts from just the first 10 pages and you responded with more sexism and misogyny.

I am taking you and your words at face value, Jan. You don't just hate women (women who do not adhere to your personal views on how we should behave or simply exist), you are also pretty sexist towards us.

Because it says so in the Bible
Oh? And that is a good authority on behaviour, is it?

The Bible also says that if a son is rebellious and does not obey his father or mother, then he shall be stoned to death.

Deuteronomy 21:18-21

18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:

19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Does that mean it's acceptable to murder one's male child for being disobedient or if he's an alcoholic?

Because, you know, it's in the bible..?

It means exactly what it says
What do you think it means?
I am asking you what you meant by that statement.

Why can't you clarify?

Because your response could be read in multiple ways. Hence why I am seeking clarification. Why did you word it like that with that little eye-roll emoji?

No I haven’t.
I’ve been exposing false accusations
And defending your misogyny and sexism by declaring that it's because it's in the bible.

No you can’t because you’re accusations are false, and you cannot show that I am either.
But I have. Numerous times.

Just because you refuse to acknowledge or believe it is not my problem, Jan.

The difference between my accusations and ya’lls, is mine are based on evidence that has been pointed out numerous times, ya’lls is based on negative emotion.
Whether you believe it or not is beside the point.

Your misogyny and sexism is well established.
 
I can't speak for James and Billvon, but personally speaking, I do not disagree with Wegs. In fact, I am in full agreement with her in her assessment of you and your behaviour.
Your misogyny and sexism is well established.
Whether you believe it or not is beside the point.

hypothesizing here
just like the drug addict cant see themselves outside the addiction without the addiction being satisfied
like the sadist cant see themself outside the process of inflicting pain & suffering on another

when the sexism is heavily entrenched in a power system that is used to define class
the class system may prevail as the interpreted reality of the afflicted/cult member

so while you point and say "sexism" they say "no im not sexist because classicism is natural"

while you ponder that parallax
keep mind that they covet socialist adherence to dictatorship authority with no democracy
then call themselves democrats

i would suggest a potential that a cult brainwashed form of classicism has been established to over lay sexist paradigms on
so when the argument of the nature of sexism comes up
it is automatically invalidated inside their mind because the real issue is classicism of power & control.
so they "naturalize" sexism to hide the hypocrisy of their classism which is used to control power & dictate authority.
while you think your talking to the misogynist
inside their mind your talking to the authority figure who is defined by absolute class position

ultimately to people like jan, women are defined as naturally impure and spiritually unclean
so how can a woman be the top authority figure ?
inherently the religion is sexist
but the sexism serves classicism as a power & control model

 
Last edited:
So, explain, what false accusations are you talking about?
Already done that
Constantly accusing women of being emotional is sexist
Not if they’re being emotional
Why are you being so sexist Jan?
Why are you a liar Bells?
In fact, I am in full agreement with her in her assessment of you and your behaviour.
You’re in full agreement of a lie
In this thread
You tell me.
You brought belief up
But I'm not.
But you are
I literally linked your sexist and misogynistic posts from just the first 10 pages and you responded with more sexism and misogyny.
You literally lied
I am taking you and your words at face value, Jan.
You’re interpreting my words
You don't just hate women (women who do not adhere to your personal views on how we should behave or simply exist), you are also pretty sexist towards us.
See. You lie.
Why the need to lie?
Oh? And that is a good authority on behaviour, is it?
Yes
The Bible also says that if a son is rebellious and does not obey his father or mother, then he shall be stoned to death.
Because, you know, it's in the bible..?
That God is Male is neither law, nor behaviour.
I am asking you what you meant by that statement.
Why?
Why can't you clarify?
Idid.
It means exactly what it says.
What don’t you understand?
Why did you word it like that with that little eye-roll emoji?
As of to say did you really?
Do you have a problem with that?
And defending your misogyny and sexism by declaring that it's because it's in the bible.
What misogyny and sexism?
But I have. Numerous times.
You have lied numerous time, that is correct
Just because you refuse to acknowledge or believe it is not my problem, Jan.
You’re problem thus far has been your aversion to the truth
Whether you believe it or not is beside the point.
That is the point
Your misogyny and sexism is well established.
The lie is established with you because of your problem explained above.
 
Last edited:
hypothesizing here
just like the drug addict cant see themselves outside the addiction without the addiction being satisfied
like the sadist cant see themself outside the process of inflicting pain & suffering on another

when the sexism is heavily entrenched in a power system that is used to define class
the class system may prevail as the interpreted reality of the afflicted/cult member

so while you point and say "sexism" they say "no im not sexist because classicism is natural"

while you ponder that parallax
keep mind that they covet socialist adherence to dictatorship authority with no democracy
then call themselves democrats

i would suggest a potential that a cult brainwashed form of classicism has been established to over lay sexist paradigms on
so when the argument of the nature of sexism comes up
it is automatically invalidated inside their mind because the real issue is classicism of power & control.
so they "naturalize" sexism to hide the hypocrisy of their classism which is used to control power & dictate authority.
while you think your talking to the misogynist
inside their mind your talking to the authority figure who is defined by absolute class position

ultimately to people like jan, women are defined as naturally impure and spiritually unclean
so how can a woman be the top authority figure ?
inherently the religion is sexist
but the sexism serves classicism as a power & control model
Pseudo intellectual gobbeldigook.
 
gobbeldigook
Not if they’re being emotional
gobbeldigook
so having no emotions is normal for interacting with people ?

i like how you divide up each sentence and make the thread appear long & make it look like your considering things carefully, when you just rejecting everything in a childish mentality

smart for parading in front of morons & half wits
makes you look intelligent when your not saying anything because they are so ignorant
and that's your normal audience ?
 
so having no emotions is normal for interacting with people ?
What is this question in relation to?
i like how you divide up each sentence and make the thread appear long & make it look like your considering things carefully, when you just rejecting everything in a childish mentality
What’s childish about rejecting lies?
smart for parading in front of morons & half wits
makes you look intelligent when your not saying anything because they are so ignorant
and that's your normal audience ?
I’ve no idea what you’re talking about.
 
A son, if you consider God grammatically male, and a daughther if you consider God grammatically female.
In french we say : "Les cellules filles".
Translated : "The daughter cells".

It has nothing to do with the fact that the cells are biologically male or female, but with the fact that cells are grammatically female...
Like, an ant is female, a dog is male etc.
Male and female are words for gender.

God declared himself as a man of war.

Your argument is invalidated with such a fact.
 
Ha ha ha ha...
... (I have no idea what are you talking about)
Hmm, okay. So, Luchito, what do you think about misogyny? (Jan is offended because we have pointed out that his posts ''drip of misogyny.'' ) He shouldn't have posted such things then, but...the internet is a funny place, sometimes. :oops:

Do you believe that misogyny is a problem in our current culture?
 
Last edited:
Keep trying, you may just raise it up to something resembling normal

You'll get there one day
Don’t give up
Get where? What do you mean by give up? I didn't say I was going to give up. You're lying by implying that I was going to give up.

Why are you lying?
 
Hmm, okay. So, Luchito, what do you think about misogyny? (Jan is offended because we have pointed out that his posts ''drip of misogyny.'' ) He shouldn't have posted such things then, but...the internet is a funny place, sometimes. :oops:

Do you believe that misogyny is a problem in our current culture?
Misogyny?

Where in the US?

We are 330 million inhabitants, how many cases of misogyny are you talking about? How much percent in the entire population?

This is necessary to be known.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top