Random Free (That is to say "Nonsense") Thoughts on physics and Cosmology

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Atlan0001

Registered Senior Member
Petal to the metal and then the traveler lifts his foot off when in the greater range of the universe:

No one, that I know of but me, has thought that a traveler might continue to accelerate in the accelerative universe forever if he began accelerating in the universe and was subject to no other local relative force preventing him from such continuity of constant acceleration. Since the speed of light is a constant, and past histories being matters of the photo-frame immediately in the eye of the beholder (the observer), the traveler and his norm of ever accelerating momentum would be a matter of unobserved and unobservable "future histories" separating the traveler more and ever more from the observer "at a distance" from the start of constant and continuous accelerating expansions (space, time, and momentum) from the observer on into infinities of separation . . . from both the observer and the ever more lagging behind in time (in space-time histories) 'mirage' of the traveler to the observer, and the observer to the traveler. A swiftly expansive triangle (triangulation) developing. Or equally but oppositely in oncoming, a swiftly contracting triangle (triangulation) developing.

------------------------------------

"From a drop of water, a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other...." 'Sherlock Holmes': A Study in Scarlet', by Arthur Canon Doyle.
 
Last edited:
Short story maybe, it could be an original idea, could even have a nom in the cannes film festival, who knows?
 
It is increasingly being articulated in theoretical physics and cosmology articles I'm picking up on, that gravity may not require any mass, any masses, to exist. That actually puts gravity, in my mind's eye, into an open, an opening, system of universe, accelerating in expansion, thus being contrary to the conventional thinking about gravity. There has to be a force to the open, the opening, system, equal but opposite to forces, or the force, of closed (closing) system.
 
Last edited:
Atlan0001 said:
It is increasingly being articulated in theoretical physics and cosmology articles I'm picking up on, that gravity may not require any mass, any masses, to exist. That actually puts gravity, in my mind's eye, into an open, an opening, system of universe, accelerating in expansion, thus being contrary to the conventional thinking about gravity.
Click to expand...
Of course gravity would still exist, where would it go?

"puts gravity, in my mind's eye, into an open, an opening, system of universe, accelerating in expansion, thus being contrary to the conventional thinking about gravity.

Are you saying gravity is relative?
 
Gravity exists in an open universe.

I'm not sure what point the OP is trying to make. He seems to once again be stating a well-known fact as if it is new to him.
 
Won't be around for a while as we are going on a short vacation to see two of our children, four sets our grandchildren and three sets of five of their families (three sets of five sets of our great-grandchildren). More nonsensical science and physics of a living cosmopolis to some around here, but greatly sensational to me.
 
Atlan0001 said:
Won't be around for a while as we are going on a short vacation to see two of our children, four sets our grandchildren and three sets of five of their families (three sets of five sets of our great-grandchildren). More nonsensical science and physics of a living cosmopolis to some around here, but greatly sensational to me.
Click to expand...
Have a lovely time, see you soon!
 
Atlan0001:
Atlan0001 said:
Petal to the metal and then the traveler lifts his foot off when in the greater range of the universe:

No one, that I know of but me, has thought that a traveler might continue to accelerate in the accelerative universe forever if he began accelerating in the universe and was subject to no other local relative force preventing him from such continuity of constant acceleration.
Click to expand...
What makes you think nobody but you has had that thought?
Atlan0001 said:
Since the speed of light is a constant, and past histories being matters of the photo-frame immediately in the eye of the beholder (the observer), the traveler and his norm of ever accelerating momentum would be a matter of unobserved and unobservable "future histories" separating the traveler more and ever more from the observer "at a distance" from the start of constant and continuous accelerating expansions (space, time, and momentum) from the observer on into infinities of separation . . . from both the observer and the ever more lagging behind in time (in space-time histories) 'mirage' of the traveler to the observer, and the observer to the traveler. A swiftly expansive triangle (triangulation) developing. Or equally but oppositely in oncoming, a swiftly contracting triangle (triangulation) developing.
Click to expand...
This is word salad. Just talking for the sake of talking, without communicating anything meaningful. Why bother?

Atlan0001 said:
It is increasingly being articulated in theoretical physics and cosmology articles I'm picking up on, that gravity may not require any mass, any masses, to exist.
Click to expand...
Maybe you should have started with this. That might have led to an interesting discussion.
Atlan0001 said:
That actually puts gravity, in my mind's eye, into an open, an opening, system of universe, accelerating in expansion, thus being contrary to the conventional thinking about gravity. There has to be a force to the open, the opening, system, equal but opposite to forces, or the force, of closed (closing) system.
Click to expand...
But... instead we just get more word salad.

You know, you could try discussing some science on sciforums. Just a thought.
 
More of my kind of nonsense pseudoscience, as in fundamental binary base2 (unsigned '0' and/or '1' (collapsed cosmological constant Planck (BC/BB) wave Horizon / point Singularity (Unity / Disunity (order / disorder (from the middle-out branching (roots) from the trunk of the tree out (on and on))))):

www.thebrighterside.news

Astronomers discover what's at the center of a black hole

Researchers combined quantum computing with machine learning to uncover fresh insights into the fundamental properties of black holes.
www.thebrighterside.news www.thebrighterside.news

Just more nonsense pseudoscience.
 
Last edited:
Every infinitesimal point of an infinite Multiverse Universe is the center point of the Universe ("The Grand Central Station and clock of the Universe" (Stephen Hawking)).

Just more nonsense pseudoscience.
 
The open (the opening) system, accelerating in expanse to infinity, to infinities, of universe holographic picture, is one with dark energy . . . one with gravity. The nonlocal (the nonlocality of) infinity pre-exists the local relative expanse to infinity, to infinities.

en.wikipedia.org

Inverse-square law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Just more of my (claimed) "word salad' "nonsense pseudoscience."
 
Last edited:
Time (temporal time) as Einstein stated is relative. The equal but opposite other to the temporal, also measuring from within and without the temporal (always measuring the temporal), is diamond hard time, so to speak, and is in no way ever "relative"! Yet many claim that time is nothing but relative time (thus, the lie of time slowing and such defined by light and the speed of light mirages as the "twins paradox" that exist solely within the photo-frame holography of light and nowhere else (that else: the universe's unobserved and unobservable objective reality of "future histories" running to any macrocosmic concurrent, any microcosmic quantum entangling, object reality)!

Just more of my (claimed) "word salad" "nonsense pseudoscience."
 
Last edited:
This thread is now closed because most of the content is meaningless nonsense.

Please try to post coherently if you intend to post to sciforums again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top