quite nice. it has effect. you answer it as irrational and deluded, which means it has purpose, you responded, you know the purpose.It's irrational and deluded nonsense.
Predicated largely on a strawman argument.
quite nice. it has effect. you answer it as irrational and deluded, which means it has purpose, you responded, you know the purpose.It's irrational and deluded nonsense.
Predicated largely on a strawman argument.
Wrong.you answer it as irrational and deluded, which means it has purpose
The apparent purpose is to promote a mistaken viewpoint.you responded, you know the purpose.
oh sorry i should write everything.Wrong.
Purpose is not defined by rationality OR delusion (or lack of either) but by intent.
The apparent purpose is to promote a mistaken viewpoint.
That doesn't make it correct.
Nor valid.
Somewhat false.a irrational thing has no existence.
Uh what?you read that person, he provoked you, he gave you a reason.
with the purpose you concluded him as deluded.
More intelligent than you? Very probably.that person is far most intelligent than us.
he is intelligent than me, but he wont accept it.Somewhat false.
Irrational arguments "exist".
As do irrational claims.
Or, in your case, irrational posts.
Uh what?
The purpose almost certainly wasn't me concluding him to be deluded.
why do you subscribe to others views. isn't it illogical what other say you believe. the views don't exist acc. to atheism no physical proof.
the state of mind can only be known 'with respect to' another mind.
what is the most sanest mind like ?
More intelligent than you? Very probably.
More intelligent than me? Doubtful. (Especially given his arguments in the linked page).
Somewhat false.
Irrational arguments "exist".
As do irrational claims.
Or, in your case, irrational posts.
Uh what?
The purpose almost certainly wasn't me concluding him to be deluded.
the purpose is the fuel we both converse.
More intelligent than you? Very probably.
More intelligent than me? Doubtful. (Especially given his arguments in the linked page).
yes i am rational, irrational, fool too.he is intelligent than me, but he wont accept it.
you can read his book, which he never wrote.
the madnesss is the excess activity, it can be constructive and destructive
he never promoted anything. he himself says he doesnt care.Wrong.
Purpose is not defined by rationality OR delusion (or lack of either) but by intent.
The apparent purpose is to promote a mistaken viewpoint.
That doesn't make it correct.
Nor valid.
the purpose is their, thats why you concluded it wrong.Wrong.
Purpose is not defined by rationality OR delusion (or lack of either) but by intent.
The apparent purpose is to promote a mistaken viewpoint.
That doesn't make it correct.
Nor valid.
Nope.the purpose is their, thats why you concluded it wrong.
simple thing is you read about him. the best method is you read him.Nope.
It's irrational and deluded nonsense.
Predicated largely on a strawman argument.
he never said 2012 will be end. mayan calendar is same as indian calendar, that was his point.The author's just a bunch of sour grapes because no one took his 2012 doomsday bullshit seriously. If it's a mental illness to not believe in magic invisible fairies who have no tangible effect on reality, then I want this disease!
he never said 2012 will be end. mayan calendar is same as indian calendar, that was his point.
don't worry if he is wrong he wont have effect on you.
what are you reading ?
what is your reality ?
you are satisfied with your reality what i am to say you.My reality is that things don't suddenly become true just because they sound good to someone's ears. If you can't test it and it isn't pointed to by an otherwise highly accurate theoretical model, then it probably doesn't exist.
you are satisfied with your reality what i am to say you.
i learned fact from him Indian calendar and mayan calendar are same.
important thing is 'yogas' are same.If that were really true, do you think it would have taken 500 years before someone noticed it in the 21st century?
you can check the similarity between ancient india and mayan.My reality is that things don't suddenly become true just because they sound good to someone's ears. If you can't test it and it isn't pointed to by an otherwise highly accurate theoretical model, then it probably doesn't exist.