jcc:
if atomic structure theory was wrong, all theories about matter could be wrong.
They can't be completely wrong, because a lot of our technology is based on our theories of matter.
what is mass if matter carries no charge?
Mass and charge are two different properties of matter. They are not related.
if matter has no charge/force, how you measure it
That depends. What do you want to measure?
maybe proton charge is not +1, the proton and fluid ball combined net charge is +1. we can never see a single proton or neutron, they all surrounded by fluid ball like a solid rock.
Are you thinking of the quark/gluon mix inside a proton or neutron?
mass equal to matter's force field strength.
No. Mass and force have different dimensions.
a gold ball contains more charges therefore heavier than a silver ball.
The mass is not directly a result of the charge.
when the ball moving in space, the resistance following speed, the faster you go the heavier you are.
That sounds like relativity.
QM atom structure suggests that atoms are like different sized ping pong balls.
Not really. QM is a wave picture.
Negative electron orbital shell, empty space and center positive nucleus.
Yes. That's the nuclear model of the atom. Evidence comes from Rutherford's experiments and others, way back in the early 1900s.
3 questions, how electron not stick with nucleus?
If there was no quantum mechanics, then they would. However, quantum physics prevents that from happening. It turns out that electrons have a ground state - a lowest possible energy level within the atom. And that energy corresponds to a certain closest distance of approach to the nucleus, roughly speaking.
In some cases, it actually is possible for electrons to interact with the nucleus (e.g. in electron capture), but that's a complication we probably don't need to worry about for now.
Why atoms deep in Planet center not crash under high pressure?
The pressures aren't high enough.
How 2 O atoms form into 1 O2 since the shell of the 2 ping pong balls are all negative charged?
Individual oxygen atoms have an "incomplete" outer electron shell. When you bring two oxygen atoms together, it turns out that a lower energy configuration is available if the two atoms "share" electrons. This forms what is known as a covalent bond between the two atoms, making and oxygen molecule.
Both oxygen atoms are electrically neutral to start with, and so is the final oxygen molecule.
I won't wipe my ass with those BS.
Please explain what is BS about those references.
spot on my ass. science cannot even explain why is electron not stick to proton in hydrogen atom.
I just explained it above.
Hope this helps!
