The following merits our attention here because it keeps recurring, and is central to the "War on Terrorism" conundrum. Because I would like for this important issue to be examined more rigorously, I challenge Mr. Spock, or anyone willing to sincerely take up the "For Our Freedoms" side to a reasoned and reasonable contest of ideas in this forum.
Because I consider this debate more important than any personalities involved, I request consideration of the following terms: That each participant be empowered to unconditionally hand over their side of the argument to a single designated member for continuation of the debate whenever available time or inspiration reaches a significant personal deficit.
For introduction, here is the most recent conversation that reminded me of this recurring topic:
I would like to offer the following link as background reference, and I will read and consider any preliminary material comparable in size and scope that supports the opposing view:
Because I consider this debate more important than any personalities involved, I request consideration of the following terms: That each participant be empowered to unconditionally hand over their side of the argument to a single designated member for continuation of the debate whenever available time or inspiration reaches a significant personal deficit.
For introduction, here is the most recent conversation that reminded me of this recurring topic:
Challenger78: "And for each you kill, you create 10 more.
People, don't you see?"
Mr. Spock: "see what? that because they are determined we should give up?"
Challenger78: "It is not because they hate you for who you are, they hate you for what you do."
Mr Spock: "they hate you for being born, and living in the western world which they consider the emphasis of evil on earth."
I would like to offer the following link as background reference, and I will read and consider any preliminary material comparable in size and scope that supports the opposing view: