Proof there is a God

JBrentonK

Banned
Banned
I recently heard from a friend, who will probably be posting in this thread btw, that some scientists claimed they cannot prove god wrong via mathematics; but rather that they can only prove that he exists by these equations. Now me and him were thinking about this and I figured I would start the thread that proved to the whole sciforums community and the world that God exists. Yeah, I am a major theist and so is my friend, and we both seem to agree that God is a simple equation even without the equations. We are talking not about childish banter but the simple reality that God is, that you know God based on simple simpleness. For example... You cannot have friends if you don't believe in God, you cannot.

These and many other reasons lead me to believe that the equations don't matter, so feel free to discuss this topic openly guys. I want to see the atheists pooring in like rain that way we theists may ascertain... *ahmm*: exactly what it is that makes God so abundantly unobvious. It's the simple things after all that make God so easy to recognize. From commonplace friendships to the very reason it rains.

After all, all of the atheists arguments boil down to a severe personality problem. I have seen so many people who are atheists have absolutely no reason to believe there is no God, in public. Common atheists and further "scientists" you are embarrassing yourself to deaths.

So this is a thread about the equations primarily although I feel we are going to discuss the simples. Please feel free to make pointed attacks against the OP because I really should just spend a few days editing it which I am not going to do. I have made my arguments very precise and there are some that need to be shortened or made more abundantly clear.

Is there proof of God? The equations say so. Let's make this a really popular thread and maybe we can all see why theists differ on their stance against atheists as opposed to how the closet atheists really feel about their "attacks".
 
Go ahead and make an argument then. I don't see one here, except a vague reference to equations. Are all theists so intellectually lazy?
 
The spider first one in, I don't know
why I like you man but deep down I get the the impression you are a good guy.

It's interesting I actually remember you making a comment on "friends" similar to JBrentonK...
 
I recently heard from a friend, who will probably be posting in this thread btw, that some scientists claimed they cannot prove god wrong via mathematics
That would be correct.

but rather that they can only prove that he exists by these equations
That would be false.

we both seem to agree that God is a simple equation even without the equations.
Then you're both wrong.

You cannot have friends if you don't believe in God, you cannot.
This is arrant nonsense.

These and many other reasons lead me to believe that the equations don't matter
Right.
So your earlier claim - that God is a simple equation - is false?

After all, all of the atheists arguments boil down to a severe personality problem.
False again. And also, given your belief in "god", illogical. If "god" exists then he made us this way.

have seen so many people who are atheists have absolutely no reason to believe there is no God, in public. Common atheists and further "scientists" you are embarrassing yourself to deaths.
Obviously you don't know what you're talking about. As usual.

So this is a thread about the equations primarily
Uh wait: didn't you just say "equations don't matter"?

I have made my arguments very precise
Given your posting history I doubt this very much.

Is there proof of God?
Not in mathematics.

The equations say so.
No they don't.
 
Dude u dnt know wat ur talking about james brent killingsworth is a genius. Wat hes tryin to say is wot out god we would not be here the evolution equation of the universe does not equal out unless u add god in as a variable scientest that have studied evolution theroy now freely admit that this is true the universe can not be created by a big bang and we simple appear millions of yrs later on a planet that can sustain us the odds are way out there thats y wen u add god in it all makes sense.
 
Dude u dnt know wat ur talking about
Wrong.

james brent killingsworth is a genius.
Also wrong. And grossly so.

Wat hes tryin to say is wot out god we would not be here the evolution equation of the universe does not equal out unless u add god in as a variable scientest that have studied evolution theroy now freely admit that this is true the universe can not be created by a big bang and we simple appear millions of yrs later on a planet that can sustain us the odds are way out there thats y wen u add god in it all makes sense.
Yeah, perhaps you should try grammar, spelling and punctuation lessons before you start spouting (insupportable) nonsense.
It won't make your posts any more rational, but it will make them less offensively painful to read.

You wouldn't be a sock of Brent, would you?
 
Dude u dnt know wat ur talking about james brent killingsworth is a genius. Wat hes tryin to say is wot out god we would not be here the evolution equation of the universe does not equal out unless u add god in as a variable scientest that have studied evolution theroy now freely admit that this is true the universe can not be created by a big bang and we simple appear millions of yrs later on a planet that can sustain us the odds are way out there thats y wen u add god in it all makes sense.
Ok then
 
For example... You cannot have friends if you don't believe in God, you cannot.
I must alert all my closest atheist friends and break this sad news to them, that we have never actually been friends! :eek:
After all, all of the atheists arguments boil down to a severe personality problem.
And what "severe personality problem" would that be?
I have seen so many people who are atheists have absolutely no reason to believe there is no God, in public.
I would hazard that only a minority of atheists actually believe there is no God, whether in public or in private. Few of the atheists on this site actually believe that there is no God. The majority of us simply don't believe one way or the other in the existence or non-existence of God, although that might depend to an extent on how you define "God".
So this is a thread about the equations primarily although I feel we are going to discuss the simples.
Feel free to provide the equations that you would like us to discuss.
I have made my arguments very precise and there are some that need to be shortened or made more abundantly clear.
You have made no argument yet at all. You have claimed, and you have insulted, but there is no argument at all in what you have so far said.
Is there proof of God? The equations say so.
What equations? Please post them so that we may all be aware of what this thread is about, if you intend it to be more than just trolling against atheists and general flaming.

I await something sensible from you that can actually form the basis of a discussion, if that is your intent.
 
So... equations only prove that God exists, but the equations don't matter, and this thread is about the equations primarily?

So what are these equations, then?
 
Dude u dnt know wat ur talking about james brent killingsworth is a genius. Wat hes tryin to say is wot out god we would not be here the evolution equation of the universe does not equal out unless u add god in as a variable scientest that have studied evolution theroy now freely admit that this is true the universe can not be created by a big bang and we simple appear millions of yrs later on a planet that can sustain us the odds are way out there thats y wen u add god in it all makes sense.

Uhm... wow. Just... just please, spellcheck, for the love of God spellcheck.

And what equations are you referring to?
 
I consider obnoxiously poor spelling and grammar to be a form of trolling. Especially when it's this blatant.
 
Uhm... wow. Just... just please, spellcheck, for the love of God spellcheck.
wild guess "twitter spelling"
Long ago, in studies into early written material from england, it seems that every area had different spelling based on local pronunciations.
Uniformity of spelling seems to have been a recent construct which is changing as we "speak"(keyboard in).
 
I'm guessing that the inordinately illiterate "shawn3633" is a sock (or deliberately recruited personal friend [1]), and also stating out loud something I suspected long ago and reported - JBrentonK is the sock of a multiply permabanned loon: Existabrent, Tnerb and numerous others.
"Shawn" named the OP as James Brent Killingsworth - something Tnerb (known to be Existabrent come back) admitted to here.

1 How else does he know the OP's full name?
 
1 How else does he know the OP's full name?
Well, he did claim that this other person, presumably shawn3633, was a friend, and I do know the full name of one or two of my friends. So that may be the explanation. But given the shocking difference in spelling (which seems almost too obvious a disguise - so maybe it's a double-bluff??) I'll go with sockpuppet. ;)
 
H
Wrong.


Also wrong. And grossly so.


Yeah, perhaps you should try grammar, spelling and punctuation lessons before you start spouting (insupportable) nonsense.
It won't make your posts any more rational, but it will make them less offensively painful to read.

You wouldn't be a sock of Brent, would you?
hahahaha lol just like u guys wen someone has somethin true n factual u down grade it by attacking their spelling man ur a real big person Aint u. Just to let u know my thumbs r huge n hard to type on my phone. I have character n u dnt i really feel sorry for. People that think the way u do u dnt believe in truth and thats sad lol
I'm guessing that the inordinately illiterate "shawn3633" is a sock (or deliberately recruited personal friend [1]), and also stating out loud something I suspected long ago and reported - JBrentonK is the sock of a multiply permabanned loon: Existabrent, Tnerb and numerous others.
"Shawn" named the OP as James Brent Killingsworth - something Tnerb (known to be Existabrent come back) admitted to here.

1 How else does he know the OP's full name?
I'm guessing that the inordinately illiterate "shawn3633" is a sock (or deliberately recruited personal friend [1]), and also stating out loud something I suspected long ago and reported - JBrentonK is the sock of a multiply permabanned loon: Existabrent, Tnerb and numerous others.
"Shawn" named the OP as James Brent Killingsworth - something Tnerb (known to be Existabrent come back) admitted to here.

1 How else does he know the OP's full name?
Im no sock just a real person with large thumbs an a tiny phone the messed up spelling. Btent told me about u u r a mean person quack man. Quack quack.
 
Come on find something else to pick on someone for since thats all ur good at. Shame how shallow sum people r lol
 
⛵☺☺☺✌
 
Back
Top